IB  Vol.3 No.2 , June 2011
Desire of a Managerial Position and Entrepreneurial Motivation: The Influence of Gender and School Type in the Canary Islands Young People
Abstract: Understanding the factors that determine and influence the choices male and females students make with regard to their studies and future occupations plays a crucial part in the explanation of earnings levels, from both the social and individual perspectives. These factors need to be taken into account in policies to be implemented in order to facilitate the transition of young people to working life. In the present study we consider the role played by the type of school - i.e. whether it is public (state-run) or private - in young people’s decisions, in the Canary Islands (Spain). Specifically we study if that factor is influencing male and female students’ entrepreneurial motivation and the desire for a managerial occupation. A representative selection of the range of secondary schools was taken for our empirical study, and logistic regression was used, which allows qualitative variables to be included among the predictive variables and enables the analysis of dichotomy phenomena. The desire for a supervisory/managerial occupation and the entrepreneurial motivation are found to be heavily influenced by the type of school (public or private) and in some cases by gender. Specifically, a notable finding of our study is that women tend to show less preference for a supervisory position in their future career, particularly if they have attended a public school.
Cite this paper: nullF. Díaz-Pérez and O. González-Morales, "Desire of a Managerial Position and Entrepreneurial Motivation: The Influence of Gender and School Type in the Canary Islands Young People," iBusiness, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2011, pp. 184-193. doi: 10.4236/ib.2011.32025.

[1]   OCDE, “De la Formation Initiale à La Vie Active: Faciliter Les Transitions,” OCDE, Paris, 2000.

[2]   L. Chisholm, “Los Jóvenes Europeos y La Orientación Profesional: Qué Hacer Que Necesiten y Deseen Los Jóvenes?” CEDEFOP, Salónica, 1996.

[3]   R. W. Rumberger and S. Thomas, “The Economic Returns to College Major, Quality and Performance: A Multilevel Analysis of Recent Graduates,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1993, pp. 1-19. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(93)90040-N

[4]   D. M. Brasington, , “Demand and Supply of Public School Quality in Metropolitan Areas: The Role of Private Schools,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2000, pp. 583-605. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00189

[5]   D. Goldhaber, “An Endogenous Model of Public School Expenditures and Private School Enrollment,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1999, pp. 106-128. doi:10.1006/juec.1998.2115

[6]   T. Dee, “Expense Preference and Student Achievement in School Districts,” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Maryland, Maryland, 1997.

[7]   J. F. Couch, W. F. Shughart and A. L. Williams, “Private School Enrollment and Public School Performance,” Public Choice, Vol. 76, 1993, pp. 301-312. doi:10.1007/BF01053301

[8]   C. M. Hoxby, “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” Working paper No. 4978, Master’s Thesis, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, 1995.

[9]   E. James, “The Public/Private Division of Responsibility for Education: An International Comparison,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1987, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(87)90028-8

[10]   T. S. Dee, “Competition and the Quality of Public School,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1998, pp. 419-427. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(97)00040-X

[11]   M. E. Corcoran and P. N. Courant, “Sex Role Socia-lization and Labor Market Outcomes,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, 1985, pp. 275-279.

[12]   C. Montmarquette, C. Cannings and S. Mahseredjian, “How Do Young People Choose College Majors?” Economic of Education Review, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2002, pp. 2-17. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00054-1

[13]   N. J. Adler, L. W. Brody and J. S. Osland, “The Women Global Leadership Forum: Enhancing One Company’s Global Leadership Capability 2,” Human Resources Management, Vol. 39, No. 2-3, 2000, pp. 209-225. doi:10.1002/1099-050X(200022/23)39:2/3<209::AID-HRM10>3.0.CO;2-Y

[14]   A. B. Fisher, “When Will Women Get to the Top?” Fortune, Vol. 21, 1992, pp. 44-56.

[15]   F. M. Díaz-Pérez, “Educación y Promoción Laboral en un Mercado Interno de Trabajo Del Sector Industrial,” EKONOMIAZ (Revista Vasca de Economía), Vol. 22, 1992, pp. 248-267.

[16]   F. M. Díaz-Pérez, “Methodology for Determine the Promotion Lines and Ports of Entry of an Industrial Internal Labor Market,” International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1993, pp. 40-58. doi:10.1108/01437729310023233

[17]   M. Levesque and M. Minniti, “The Effect of Aging on Entrepreneurial Behaviour,” The Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2006, pp. 177-94. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.003

[18]   D. G. Blanchflower, “Self-Employment: More May Not be Better”, NBER Working Paper No. 10286, 2004.

[19]   E. A. Rubio López, E. Cordón-Pozo and A. L. Martín, “Actitudes Hacia la Creación de Empresas: Un Modelo Explicativo,” Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1999, pp. 37-51.

[20]   J. M. S. Palacio and A. Redondo Cano, “Actitudes Hacia la Creación de Empresas; Un Estudio Empírico Aplicado a Los Estudiantes de Relacione Laborales de la Universidad de Valencia,” II Jornadas Nacionales sobre la ense?anza en las Relaciones Laborales, Salam-anca, junio,1997.

[21]   A. C. García, “Capacidades Empresariales y Directivas Como Explicación de la Competitividad,” V Congreso Nacional de Economía, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, diciembre 1995.

[22]   O. G. Morales, “Análisis de la Motivación Empresarial en la Población Juvenil Según Tipo de Centro,” Revista de Educación, Vol. 331, 2003, pp. 533-559.

[23]   M. Minniti and C. Nardone, “Being in Someone Else’s Shoes: The Role of Gender in Nascent Entrepreneurship,” Small Business Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2-3. 2007, pp. 223-38. doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9017-y

[24]   F. M. Díaz-Pérez, et al., “Investigación Sobre la Situación de la Mujer en el Mercado de Trabajo Atendiendo a Los Requerimientos de la Demanda,” Instituto Canario de la Mujer, ejemplar policopiado, Sta. Cruz de Tenerife, 2001.

[25]   F. M. Díaz-Pérez, M. Bonnet-Escuela and C. Fernández-Hernández, “Mujer Emprendedora en un Entorno Rural: El Caso de la Isla de La Palma,” Asociación de Turismo Rural Isla Bonita, .Sta. Cruz de Tenerife, 2000.

[26]   H. Lankford and J. Wyckoff, “Primary and Secondary School Choice Among Public and Religious Alternative,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1992, pp. 317-337. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(92)90040-A

[27]   J. E. Long and E. F. Toma, “The Determinants of Private School Attendance, 1970-1980,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, 1988, pp. 351-357. doi:10.2307/1928323

[28]   West, E. and Palsson, H. (1988): Parental choice of school characteristics: Estimation using state-wide data, Economic Inquiry, 26, 725-740.

[29]   J. Martinez-Vázquez and B. Seaman, “Private Schooling and the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Public Finance Quartely, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1985, pp. 293-318.

[30]   J. M. Gemello and J. Osman, “Estimating the Demand for Private School Enrolment,” American Journal of Education, Vol. 92, No. 3, 1984, pp. 262-279. doi:10.1086/443749

[31]   R. Haveman and B. Wolfe, “The Determinants of Children’s Attainment: A Review of Methods and Findings,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1995, pp. 1829-1878.

[32]   E. Hanushek, “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1986, pp. 1141-1177.

[33]   D. M. Brasington, “The Supply of Public School Quality,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2002, pp. 367-377. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00074-2

[34]   S. T. Morales-Galdrón and S. Roig, “The New Venture Decisions: An Analysis Based on the GEM Project Database,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2005, pp. 479-99. doi:10.1007/s11365-005-4774-7

[35]   D. R. Gnyawali and D. S. Fogel, “Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1994, pp. 43-62.

[36]   A. Shapero, “The Entrepreneurial Event,” In: C. A. Kent Ed., The environment for entrepreneurship, M.A.: Lexington Books, Toronto, 1984, pp. 21-40.

[37]   A. Shapero and L. Sokol, “The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship,” In: C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vespers Eds., Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1982, pp. 72-90.

[38]   M. Paglin and M. Rufolo, “Heterogeneous Human Capital, Occupational Choice, and Male-Female Earnings Differences,” Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1990, pp. 123-144. doi:10.1086/298239

[39]   J. Albrecht, A. Bj?rklund and S. Vroman, “Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden,” Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2003, pp. 145. doi:10.1086/344126

[40]   CEDEFOP, “Formación Para Una Sociedad de Cambio,” Informe acerca de la situación actual de la investigación sobre la formación profesional en Europa, Salónica, CEDEFOP, 1999.

[41]   J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black, “Multivariate Data Analysis,” Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1998.