Back
 LCE  Vol.6 No.1 , March 2015
Living on a Carbon Diet
Show more
Abstract: The objectives of this paper are to understand the features of simulated low carbon lifestyles under strong greenhouse gas emissions reduction assumptions (20%, 50%), the nature of trade-offs and the hierarchy of choices operated by households within a limited carbon and financial carbon budget, the acceptability of important changes in consumption patterns, and finally the values and representations, benefits and losses that households express in such changes. The research implemented a protocol combining experimental economy (simulation of carbon budget reductions under financial constraints) and anthropology (semi-structured interviews, to understand the rationale behind choices). Each household of the sample (n = 30) was investigated for 2 - 3 days. Firstly, a very detailed carbon footprint of the household was calculated. Then households were proposed a list of 65 pre-defined solutions covering most of available mitigation options, with financial and carbon cost and savings calculated for their real situation. The sample reached an average of -37% (-12%/-64%), with a preference to act on habitat and food and a reluctance to change transport consumption. Due to the amount of reductions asked, low carbon lifestyles finally impact comfort but allow saving money. Recommendations for policies are presented.
Cite this paper: Dubois, G. (2015) Living on a Carbon Diet. Low Carbon Economy, 6, 13-20. doi: 10.4236/lce.2015.61003.
References

[1]   Dietza, T., Gardnerb, G.T., Gilliganc, J., Sternd, P.C. and Vandenberghe, M.P. (2009) Household Actions Can Provide a Behavioral Wedge to Rapidly Reduce US Carbon Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18452-18456.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106

[2]   Arnell, N. and Kram, T. (2011) A Framework for a New Generation of Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Impact, Adaptation, Vulnerability, and Mitigation Research. Boulder, 42 p.

[3]   Moss, R., Edmonds, J., et al. (2010) The Next Generation of Scenarios for Climate Change Research and Assessment. Nature, 463, 747-756.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08823

[4]   Van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., et al. (2012) A Proposal for a New Scenario Framework to Support Research and Assessment in Different Climate Research Communities. Global Environmental Change, 22, 21-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.002

[5]   Raskin, P., Banuri, T., et al. (2002) Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead. Boston, SEI, 99 p.

[6]   Rosen, R., Electris, C., et al. (2010) Global Scenarios for the Century Ahead. Boston Tellus Institute, 17 p.

[7]   Victor, P.A. (2011) Growth, Degrowth and Climate Change: A Scenario Analysis. Ecological Economics, 7 p.

[8]   Dubois, G., Benevise, F. and Ceron, J.P. (2013) Arbitrages Individuels, Choix Collectifs: Les modes de vie des ménages face aux politiques d’atténuation des émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Final Report for the Program Transition vers une Economie Ecologique, 157 p.

[9]   IPCC (1996) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.

[10]   Aall, C. and Hille, J. (2009) Consumption—A Missing Dimension in Climate Policy. In: Bhaskar, R., Frank, C., Hoyer, K.G., Naess, P. and Parker, J., Eds., Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change, Routledge, London.

[11]   Munksgaard, J. and Pedersen, K. (2001) CO2 Accounts for Open Economies: Producer or Consumer Responsibility? Energy Policy, 29, 327-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00120-8

[12]   Bastianoni, S., Pulselli, F.M. and Tiezzi, E. (2004) The Problem of Assigning Responsibility for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Ecological Economics, 49, 253-257.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.018

[13]   Peters, G.P. and Hertwich, E.G. (2006) Pollution Embodied in Trade: The Norwegian Case. Global Environmental Change, 16, 379-387.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.001

[14]   Hertwich, E.G. and Peters, G.P. (2009) Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 6414-6420.

[15]   Helm, D., Smale, R. and Phillips, J. (2007) Too Good To Be True? The UK’s Climate Change Record. New College, Oxford, 29 p.

[16]   Munasinghe, M., Dasgupta, P., Southerton, D., Bows, A. and Mcmeekin, A. (2009) Consumers, Business and Climate Change. The University of Manchester Sustainable Consumption Institute, Manchester, 59 p.

[17]   Chakravarty, S., Chikkatur, A., de Coninck, H., Pacala, S., Socolow, R. and Tavoni, M. (2009) Sharing Global CO2 Emission Reductions among One Billion High Emitters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11884-11888.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905232106

[18]   Lenglart, F., Lesieur, C., et al. (2010) Les émissions de CO2 du circuit économique en France. Service de l’observation et des statistiques (SOeS), Commissariat général au développement durable, Paris.

[19]   Chitnis, M., Druckman, A., Hunt, L.C., Jackson, T. and Milne, S. (2012) Forecasting Scenarios for UK Household Expenditure and Associated GHG Emissions: Outlook to 2030. Ecological Economics, 84, 129-141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.016

[20]   Fleming, D. (1998) Domestic Tradable Quotas as an Instrument to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Proceedings of Workshop, EUR18541, European Commission, Bruxelles, 1-2 July 1998.

[21]   Lane, C., Harris, B. and Roberts, S. (2008) An Analysis of the Technical Feasibility and Potential Cost of a Personal Carbon Trading Scheme. Accenture and Centre for Sustainable Energy/DEFRA, London.

[22]   Prescott, M.A. (2008) A Persuasive Climate: Personal Trading and Changing Lifestyles. RSA, The Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, London, 31 p.

[23]   Rousseaux, S. (2009) Etat des lieux international des programmes de “carte carbone” pour les particuliers. ADEME, Paris, 68 p.

[24]   Starkey, R. and Anderson, K. (2005) Domestic Tradable Quotas: A Policy for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy Use. Tyndall Centre, Norwich, 49.

[25]   Martin, O. (2005) L’enquête et sesméthodes: L’analyse des données quantitatives. Paris.

[26]   Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York.

[27]   Hulme, M. (2011) Meet the Humanities. Nature Climate Change, 1, 177-179.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1150

[28]   Alami, S., Desjeux, D. and Garabuau-Moussaoui, I. (2009) Les méthodes qualitatives. PUF, Paris.

[29]   Barnes, J., Dove, M., Lahsen, M., Mathews, A., McElwee, P., McIntosh, R., et al. (2013) Contribution of Anthropology to the Study of Climate Change. Nature Climate Change, 3, 541-544.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1775

[30]   Contestabile, M. (2012) Psychology. Moral Dimension. Nature Climate Change, 2, 231.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1476

[31]   Markowitz, E.M. and Shariff, A.F. (2012) Climate Change and Moral Judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2, 243-247.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1378

[32]   Eurobarometer (2009) Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change. Special Eurobarometer 322, European Commission.

[33]   Woodside, C. (2011) It Isn’t Easy Being Green. Nature Climate Change, 1, 13-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1076

[34]   Whitfield, J. (2011) Green Status. Nature Climate Change, 1, 323-325.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1226

[35]   Weber, E. (2010) What Shapes Perceptions of Climate Change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 332-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41

[36]   Bohensky, E.L., Smajgl, A. and Brewer, T. (2013) Patterns in Household-Level Engagement with Climate Change in Indonesia. Nature Climate Change, 3, 348-351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1762

[37]   Thogersen, J. (2013) Psychology: Inducing Green Behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 3, 100-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1808

[38]   Franz-Vasdeki, J. (2011) Behaviour: Guilt-Free Trip. Nature Climate Change.

[39]   Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002) Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

[40]   Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L. (2007) Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445-459.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

[41]   Wolf, J. and Moser, S.C. (2011) Individual Understandings, Perceptions, and Engagement with Climate Change: Insights from In-Depth Studies across the World. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 547-569.

[42]   Crompton, T. (2011) Value Matters. Nature Climate Change, 1, 276-277.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1196

[43]   Mary, D. and Isherwood, B. (1979) The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. New York.

[44]   Eden, S. (2009) Food Labels of Boundary Objects: How Consumers Make Sense of Organic and Functional Foods. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 179-194.

[45]   Moussaoui, I. (2007) De la société de consommation à la société de modération, Ce que les Francais disent, pensent et font en matière de maitrise de l’énergie. les Annales de la recherche urbaine, No. 104, Septembre.

[46]   Zélem, M.C. (2010) Politique de maitrise de la demande d’énergie et résistances au changement, Une approche socio-anthropologique. L’Harmattan, Paris.

[47]   Leiserowitz, A. (2007) International Public Opinion, Perception, and Understanding of Global Climate Change. Human Development Report Office.

[48]   Lorenzoni, I. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2006) Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z

[49]   Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2011) Perceptions of Climate Change and Willingness to Save Energy Related to Flood Experience. Nature Climate Change, 1, 46-49.

[50]   Weber, E. (2006) Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming Does Not Scare Us (Yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3

[51]   Weber, E.U. (2011) Psychology: Climate Change Hits Home. Nature Climate Change, 1, 25-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1070

[52]   Weber, E.U. (2013) Psychology: Seeing Is Believing. Nature Climate Change, 3, 312-313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1859

[53]   Hubacek, K. and Guan, D. (2011) Behaviour: The Net Effects of Green Lifestyles. Nature Climate Change, 1, 250-251.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1181

[54]   Brown, A. (2010) Behaviour: Offsetting Efficiency Gains. Nature Climate Change.

[55]   Beattie, G. and Sale, L. (2009) Explicit and Implicit Attitudes to Low and High Carbon Footprint Products. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 5, 191-206.

[56]   Milgram, S. (1974) Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Tavistock Publications, London.

[57]   TEC and Credoc (2009) Météorologie, climat et déplacements touristiques: Comportements et stratégies des touristes. DGCIS/DIACT/ministère de l’Ecologie, 97 p.

[58]   Hares, A., Dickinson, J. and Wilkes, K. (2010) Climate Change and the Air Travel Decisions of UK Tourists. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 466-473.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.018

[59]   Bain, P.G., Hornsey, M.J., Bongiorno, R. and Jeffries, C. (2012) Promoting Pro-Environmental Action in Climate Change Deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2, 600-603.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1532

[60]   Eber, N. and Willinger, M. (2005) L’économie expérimentale. La découverte, Paris.

[61]   Druckman, A. and Jackson, T. (2010) The Bare Necessities: How Much Household Carbon Do We Really Need? Ecological Economics, 69, 1794-1804.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.018

 
 
Top