PSYCH  Vol.6 No.3 , February 2015
What Women Want in a Man: The Role of Age, Social Class, Ethnicity, and Height
This study aimed to use a budget allocation model to examine mate preference. 303 female respondents with a mean age of 21.75 years were asked about their preferences for someone to take on a blind date. They were presented with descriptions of 16 hypothetical men which they were asked to rate for personal choice and suitability. The hypothetical men differed on age (18 - 20 years vs. 30 - 33 years), social class (I/II vs. III/IV), ethnicity (Caucasian vs. Asian) and height (short/average from 5’6” to 5’8” and tall 6’1” to 6’3”). Overall females preferred younger, taller males from their own racial group and with a higher social class. Women showed a strong preference for men their own age, ethnicity and especially height.

Cite this paper
Furnham, A. , McClelland, A. & (2015). What Women Want in a Man: The Role of Age, Social Class, Ethnicity, and Height. Psychology, 6, 278-290. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.63028.
[1]   Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., & Carmeli, Y. (2002). Psysiognomy, Familism and Consumerism: Preferences among Jewish-Israeli Recipients of Donor Insemination. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 363-376.

[2]   Buss, D. M. (1985). Human Mate Selection. American Scientist, 73, 47-51.

[3]   Buss, D. M., & Angleitner, A. (1989). Mate Selection Preferences in Germany and the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1269-1280.

[4]   Candolin, U. (2003). The Use of Multiple Cues in Mate Choice. Biological Reviews, 78, 575-595.

[5]   Chang, L., Wang, Y., Shackelford, T., & Buss, D. (2011) Chinese Mate Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 678-683.

[6]   Fletcher, G., Simpson, J., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72-89.

[7]   Fletcher, G., Tither, J., O’Loughin, C., Froesen, M., & Overall, N. (2004) Warm and Homely or Cold and Beautiful: Sex Differences in Trading off Traits in Mate Selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 659-672.

[8]   Furnham, A. (1988). Lay Theories. Oxford: Pergamon.

[9]   Furnham, A. (2009). Sex Differences in Mate Selection Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 622-627.

[10]   Furnham, A. F., Hassomal, A., & McClelland, A. (2002). A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Factors and Biases Involved in the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 381-391.

[11]   Furnham, A., & Wilson, E. (2011). Gender Differences in Estimated Salaries: A UK Study. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 623-630.

[12]   Furnham, A., Ariffin, A., & McClelland, A. (2007). Factors Affecting Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources across Life-Threatening Medical Conditions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2903-2921.

[13]   Furnham, A., Thomas, C., & Petrides, K. V. (2002). Patient Characteristics and the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 7, 99-106.

[14]   Furnham, A., Thomson, K., & McClelland, A. (2002). The Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources across Medical Conditions. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75, 189-203.

[15]   Greenless, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and Age Differences in Preferences and Tactics of Mate Attraction: Analysis of Published Advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59-72.

[16]   Harrison, A. A., & Saeed, L. (1977). Let’s Make a Deal: An Analysis of Revelations and Stipulations in Lonely Hearts Advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 257-264.

[17]   Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of Facial Attractiveness in Five Populations. Human Nature, 4, 271-296.

[18]   Kenrick, D., Groth, G., Trost, M., & Sadalla, E. (1993). Integrating Evolutionary and Social Exchange Perspectives on Relationships: Effects of Gender, Self-Appraisal, and Involvement Level on Mate Selection Criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.

[19]   Klohnen, E. C., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal Attraction and Personality: What Is Attractive—Self Similarity, Ideal Similarity, Complementarity or Attachment Security? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 709-722.

[20]   Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). Hurrydate: Mate Preferences in Action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227-244.

[21]   Li, N., & Kenrick, D. (2006). Sex Similarities and Differences in Preferences for Short-Term Mates: What, Whether, and Why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489.

[22]   Li, N., Valentine, K., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate Preferences in the US and Singapore: A Cross-Cultural Test of the Mate Preference Priority Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 291-294.

[23]   Mays, H., & Hill, G. (2004). Choosing Mates: Good Genes versus Genes That Are a Good Fit. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 554-559.

[24]   Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of Unconstrained Directional Selection for Male Tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302-311.

[25]   Nettle, D. (2002). Height and Reproductive Success in a Cohort of British Men. Human Nature, 13, 473-491.

[26]   Pawlowski, B. (2003). Variable Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism in Height as a Strategy for Increasing the Pool of Potential Partners in Humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 709-712.

[27]   Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Evolutionary Fitness: Tall Men Have More Reproductive Success. Nature, 403, 156.

[28]   Place, S., Todd, P., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. (2010). Humans Show Mate Copying after Observing Real Mate Choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320-325.

[29]   Prokosch, M., Coss, R., Scheib, J., & Blozis, S. (2009). Intelligence and Mate Choice: Intelligent Men Are Always Appealing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 11-20.

[30]   Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2012). Sex and Age Differences in Mate-Selection Preferences. Human Nature, 23, 447-466.

[31]   Sear, R. (2006). Height and Reproductive Success. Human Nature, 17, 405-418.

[32]   Shackelford, T., Schmitt, D., & Buss, D. (2005). Universal Dimensions of Human Mate Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447-458.

[33]   Stanik, C., Kurzban, R., & Ellsworth, P. (2010). Rejection Hurts. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 682-694.

[34]   Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Nettle, D., & Verhulst, S. (2013). Are Human Mating Preferences with Respect to Height Reflected in Actual Pairings? PLoS ONE, 8, e54186.

[35]   Stulp, G., Pollet, T. V., Verhulst, S., & Buunk, A. P. (2012). A Curvilinear Effect of Height on Reproductive Success in Human Males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 375-384.

[36]   Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2008). The Psychology of Physical Attractiveness. Hove: Psychology Press.

[37]   Wong, B., & Candolin, U. (2005). How Is Female Mate Choice Affected by Male Competition. Biological Reviews, 80, 559-571.

[38]   Wood, D., & Brumbaugh, C. (2009). Using Revealed Mate Preferences to Evaluate Market Force and Differential Preference Explanations for Mate Selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1226-1244.