CE  Vol.2 No.2 , June 2011
Redefining Technology Role in Education
Abstract: The paper is a conceptual attempt to explore the new roles of technology in education which has increasingly become more than a sole medium, as was its description in the past. Basically, the key idea is that technology, with the powers of ICT, in education has now three main roles, namely: a medium/resource, a management, and a delivery. These new roles, when combined, could set the stage for restructuring the education institutions in an innovative way that leaves the current education system in history.
Cite this paper: nullMusawi, A. (2011). Redefining Technology Role in Education. Creative Education, 2, 130-135. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018.

[1]   Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2004). The meanings of educational technology, definition and terminology committee. Document #MM4.0 (1 June 2004).

[2]   Alison, H., & Alison, G. (2010). Shifting paradigms: Teaching, learning and web 2.0. Reference Services Review, 38, 621-633. doi:10.1108/00907321011090764

[3]   Garlikov, R. (n. d.). The Socratic method: Teaching by asking instead of by telling. Retrieved 23 May 2011.

[4]   Garrido, S. (2002). Webstorming: Brainstorming in the web. In M. Driscoll and T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2002 (pp. 2601-2602). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

[5]   Garson, G. David (2000). The Role of Technology in Quality Education. Retrieved 17 February 2011. AB&usg=AFQjCNGpExLngIPmkuKkBDUUriUkR5xbdA.

[6]   Idrus, R. (2005). From Facilitation to the Transformation of Learning: From Pedagogy to Technogogy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Educational Technology Conference: Distance Education, 21-23 September 2005, Sakarya, Turkey.

[7]   Kandlbinder, P. (2004). Reconstructing educational technology: A critical analysis of online teaching and learning in the university. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Policy and Practice, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney.

[8]   Kinuthia, W. Laurie, B. D., & Clarke, P. A. J. (2010). Development of pedagogical technology integration content knowledge in preparing mathematics pre-service teachers: the role of instructional case analyses and reflection, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18, 645-669.

[9]   Kissane, B. (2003). Three roles for technology: Towards a humanistic renaissance in mathematics education, Murdoch University, Australia. Retrieved 17 February 2011. DA&ved=0CBUQFjAD&usg=AFQjCNHKJ0M9PnEbmThb1BogHE-K9ozFPg

[10]   Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24-33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x

[11]   Landen, Mary (1997). The role of technology in education and training, Industrial and Commercial Training, 29, 230–235. doi:10.1108/00197859710190751

[12]   Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. The Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1.

[13]   Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108, 1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

[14]   Kumar, S. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of the usefulness of web 2.0 in higher education: Survey development. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on e-Learning, Bari: the University of Bari.

[15]   Rempel, P., Montgomerie, T.C., & Szabo, M. (1998). IT roles and competencies: Are we prepared for the 21st century. In Proceedings of ED-Media/ED-Telecom 98 (pp. 1133-1138). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

[16]   Richard, B. (2009). The Effect of Web 2.0 on Teaching and Learning, Teacher Librarian, 37, 52-53.

[17]   Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Educational technology research that makes a difference: Series introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 192-201.

[18]   Rutz, E., Eckart, R., Wade, J. E., Maltbie, C., Rafter, C., & Elkins, V. (2003). Student performance and acceptance of instructional technology: Comparing technology-enhanced and traditional instruct- tion for a course in statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 133-140.

[19]   Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2.

[20]   Spence, M., & Haughey, M. (2005). Issues and challenges of instructional technology specialists in alberta colleges. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31, Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

[21]   Topcu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Effects of the asynchronous webbased course: Pre-service teachers’ achievement, metacognition, and attitudes towards the course. Educational Technology and Society, 11, 181-197.

[22]   Vijayakumar, S. (2011). Using technology for brainstorming in a writing class: An innovative approach. Journal of Technology for English Language Teachers, 1.