SS  Vol.6 No.2 , February 2015
Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer (Series of 50 Cases)
Abstract: Background: Perforated peptic ulcer is a common surgical emergency. The classic treatment is the mid-line laparotomy. However, laparoscopic treatment has been shown to be reliable. Few studies have evaluated its overall utility. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients and Methods: This study included 50 patients presented by perforated peptic ulcer between July 2009 and August 2014. They were submitted to laparoscopic omental patch repair with thorough peritoneal wash. Patients’ demographics, diagnostic techniques, management and outcome were evaluated. Results: The mean age was 38.6 years with male to female ratio being 1.6:1. The perforation was diagnosed by plain X-ray abdomen in erect position in 43 patients and by abdominal CT scan in 7 patients. The laparoscopic repair of the perforation was successful in 48 patients while in 2 patients mid-line laparotomy was needed for proper control of the severe intra-abdominal sepsis. Post-operatively, all patients tolerated soft diet on the 3rd post-operative day and full diet on the 4th post-operative day. The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.5 days. Two patients developed post-operative intra-abdominal collection that was treated by ultrasound guided drainage, three patients developed umbilical port site wound infection while only two patients developed leakage, one of them reoperated after failed conservative surgery. No mortality was encountered in the study. Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe and reliable technique with accepted morbidity and mortality rates with all the advantages of the minimally invasive surgery.
Cite this paper: Abdelaziem, S. , Hashish, M. , Suliman, A. and Sargsyan, D. (2015) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer (Series of 50 Cases). Surgical Science, 6, 80-90. doi: 10.4236/ss.2015.62014.

[1]   [1] Bertleff, M.J. and Lange, J.F. (2010) Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review of History and Treatment. Digestive Surgery, 27, 161-169.

[2]   Hopkins, R.J., Girardi, L.S. and Turney, E.A. (1996) Relationship between Helicobacter Pylori Eradication and Reduced Duodenal and Gastric Ulcer Recurrence: A Review. Gastroenterology, 110, 1244-1252.

[3]   Mouret, P., Francois, Y., Vignal, J., et al. (1990) Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Peptic Ulcer. British Journal of Surgery, 77, 1006.

[4]   Nathanson, L.K., Easter, D.W. and Cuschieri, A. (1990) Laparoscopic Repair/Peritoneal Toilet of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer. Surgical Endoscopy, 4, 232-233.

[5]   Druart, M.L., Van Hee, R., Etienne, J., et al. (1997) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer. A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 11, 1017-1020.

[6]   Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Systematic Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcers. British Journal of Surgery, 92, 1195-1207.

[7]   Bhogal, R.H., Athwal, R., Durkin, D., et al. (2008) Comparison between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Ulcer Disease. World Journal of Surgery, 32, 2371-2374.

[8]   Sommer, T., Elbroend, H. and Friis-Andersen, H. (2010) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Ulcer in Western Denmark —A Retrospective Study. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 99, 119-121.

[9]   Xia, B., Xia, H.H., Ma, C., et al. (2005) Trends in the Prevalence of Peptic Ulcer Disease and Helicpbacter Pylori Infection in Family Physician-Referred Uninvestigated Dyspeptic Patients in Hong Kong. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 22, 243-249.

[10]   Wang, F.W., Tu, M.S., Chuang, H.Y., et al. (2011) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Asymptomatic Peptic Ulcer Disease in Taiwan. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17, 1199-1203.

[11]   Lu, C.L., Chang, S.S., Wang, S.S., Chang, F.Y. and Lee, S.D. (2004) Silent Peptic Ulcer Disease: Frequency, Factors Leading to Silence, and Implications Regarding the Pathogenesis of Visceral Symptoms. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 60, 34-38.

[12]   Bertleff, M.J. and Lange, J.F. (2010) Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: First Choice? A Review of Literature. Surgical Endoscopy, 24, 1231-1239.

[13]   Vaidya, B.B., Chaitanya, P.G. and Shah, J.B. (2009) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer with Delayed Presentation. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 19, 153-156.

[14]   Bertleff, M.J., Halm, J.A., Bemelman, W.A., van der Ham, A.C., van der Harst, E., Oei, H.I., et al. (2009) Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer: The LAMA Trial. World Journal of Surgery, 33, 1368-1373.

[15]   Lee, J., Sung, K., Lee, D., Lee, W. and Kim, W. (2011) Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of a Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: Intracorporeal “Cross and Twin” Knotting. Surgical Endoscopy, 25, 229-233.

[16]   Ates, M., Sevil, S., Bakircioglu, E. and Colak, C. (2007) Laparoscopic Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation without Omental Patch versus Conventional Open Repair. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 17, 615-619.

[17]   Sauerland, S., Agresta, F., Bergamaschi, R., Borzellino, G., Budzynski, A., Champault, G., et al. (2006) Laparoscopy for Abdominal Emergencies. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 14-29.

[18]   Lau, W.Y. (2002) Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Open versus Laparoscopic Repair. Asian Journal of Surgery, 25, 267-269.

[19]   Boey, J. and Wong, J. (1987) Perforated Duodenal Ulcers. World Journal of Surgery, 11, 319-324.

[20]   Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers. Surgical Endoscopy, 19, 1565-1571.

[21]   Katkhouda, N., Mavor, E., Mason, R.J., Campos, G.M.R., Soroushyari, A. and Berne, T.V. (1999) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers: Outcome and Efficacy in 30 Consecutive Patients. Archives of Surgery, 134, 845-848. Discussion 849-850.

[22]   Thorsen, K., Glomsaker, T.B., Meer, A.V., Soreide, K. and Arne S?reide, J. (2011) Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 15, 1329-1335.

[23]   Lo, H.C., Wu, S.C., Huang, H.C., Yeh, C.C., Huang, J.C. and Hsieh, C.H. (2011) Laparoscopic Simple Closure Alone Is Adequate for Low Risk Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 1873-1878.

[24]   Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Risk Factors Influencing the Early Outcome Results after Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer and Their Predictive Value. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 390, 413-420.

[25]   Palanivelu, C., Jani K. and Senthilnathan, P. (2007) Laparoscopic Management of Duodenal Ulcer Perforation: Is It Advantageous? Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 26, 64-66.

[26]   Lam, P.W.F., Lam, M.C.S., Hui, E.K.L., Sun, Y.W. and Mok, F.P.T. (2005) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal ulceRs. The “Three-Stitch” Graham Patch Technique. Surgical Endoscopy, 19, 1627-1630.

[27]   Arnaud, J.P., Tuech, J.J., Bergamaschi, R., Patrick, P. and Nicolas, R. (2002) Laparoscopic Suture Closure of Perforated Duodenal Peptic Ulcer. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Technique, 12, 145-147.

[28]   Schein, M., Gecelter, G., Freinkel, W., Gerding, H. and Becker, P.J. (1990) Peritoneal Lavage in Abdominal Sepsis. A Controlled Clinical Study. Archives of Surgery, 125, 1132-1135.

[29]   Lagoo, S., McMahon, R.L., Kakihara, M., Pappas, T.N. and Eubanks, S. (2002) The Sixth Decision Regarding Perforated Duodenal Ulcer. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 6, 359-368.

[30]   Lau, H. (2004) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Meta-Analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 18, 1013-1021.

[31]   Robertson, G.S., Wemyss-Holden, S.A. and Maddern, G.J. (2000) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers. The Role of Laparoscopy in Generalized Peritonitis. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82, 6-10.

[32]   Gupta, R., Sample, C., Bamehriz, F. and Birch, D.W. (2006) Infectious Complications Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 49, 397-400.

[33]   Memon, M.A. (1997) Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Current Status. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 79, 393-402.

[34]   Petrowsky, H., Demartines, N. and Rousson, V. (2004) Evidence-Based Value of Prophylactic Drainage in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgery, 240, 1074-1085.

[35]   Merad, F., Yahchouchi, E., Hay, J.M., Fingerhut, A., Laborde, Y., Langlois-Zantain, O., et al. (1998) Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage after Elective Colonic Resection and Suprapromontory Anastomosis: A Multicenter Study Controlled by Randomization. French Association for Surgical Research. Archives of Surgery, 133, 309-314.

[36]   Dandapat, M.C. and Panda, C. (1992) A Perforated Appendix: Should We Drain? Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 90, 147-148.

[37]   Nasir, A.A., Abdurahman, L.O. and Adeniran, J.O. (2012) Is Intra-Abdominal Drainage Necessary after Laparotomy for Typhoid Intestinal Perforation? Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 47, 355-358.

[38]   Urbach, D.R., Kennedy, E.D. and Cohen, M.M. (1999) Colon and Rectal Anastomosis Do Not Require Routine Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgery, 229, 174-180.

[39]   Graham, R. (1937) The Treatment of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers. Surgery Gynecology Obstetric, 64, 235-238.

[40]   Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Management Strategies, Early Results, Benefits, and Risk Factors of Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer. World Journal of Surgery, 29, 1299-1310.

[41]   Siu, W.T., Leong, H.T., Law, B.K., Chau, C.H., Li, A., Fung, K.H., et al. (2002) Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Surgery, 235, 313-319.

[42]   Kirshtein, B., Bayme, M., Mayer, Lantsberg, T.L., Avinoach, E. and Mizrahi, S. (2005) Laparoscopic Treatment of Gastro-Duodenal Perforations. Surgical Endoscopy, 19, 1487-1490.