TEL  Vol.5 No.1 , February 2015
The Relationship between Privatization and Regulation on Foreign Investment Policies
Abstract: Using a simple mixed oligopoly model, this paper examines the relationship between market-openings to foreign capital and privatization of a domestic public firm. Two types of market-openings are considered. First is that, given the number of the firms, the restriction on the share of foreign capital in each corporate joint venture is relaxed. Second is that, given the share of foreign capital in each corporate joint venture, the restriction on the number of the firms is relaxed. The analysis shows that the optimal level of privatization critically depends on the types of market openings to foreign capital. The optimal level of privatization declines as the share of foreign capital in each corporate joint venture increases. By contrast, the optimal level of privatization rises with an increase in the number of the firms operating in the market. The two different strategies for market-openings result in the opposite impacts on the welfare-maximizing government’s incentive for privatization.
Cite this paper: Han, L. and Ogawa, H. (2015) The Relationship between Privatization and Regulation on Foreign Investment Policies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 97-102. doi: 10.4236/tel.2015.51014.

[1]   Smith, D.A.C. and Trebilcock, J.M. (2001) State-Owned Enterprises in Less Developed Countries: Privatization and Alternative Reform Strategies. European Journal of Law and Economics, 12, 217-252.

[2]   Barcena-Ruiz, J.C. and Garzon, M.B. (2005) International Trade and Strategic Privatization. Review of Development Economics, 9, 502-513.

[3]   Matsumura, T. (1998) Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 473-483.

[4]   Fershtman, C. (1990) The Interdependence between Ownership Status and Market Structure: the Case of Privatization. Economica, 57, 319-328.

[5]   Bennett, J. and Maw, J. (2003) Privatization, Partial State Ownership, and Competition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 58-74.

[6]   Gupta, N. (2005) Partial Privatization and Firm Performance. Journal of Finance, 60, 987-1015.

[7]   Sun, Q., Zhang, A. and Li, J. (2005) A Study of Optimal State Shares in Mixed Oligopoly: Implications for SOE Reform and Foreign Competition. China Economic Review, 16, 1-27.

[8]   Chao, C.C. and Yu, E.S.H. (2006) Partial Privatization, Foreign Competition, and Optimum Tariff. Review of International Economics, 14, 87-92.

[9]   Kumar, A. and Saha, B. (2008) Spatial Competition in a Mixed Duopoly with One Partially Nationalized Firm. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 326-341.

[10]   Fjell, K. and Pal, D. (1996) A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29, 737-743.

[11]   Pal, D. and White, M.D. (1998) Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy. Southern Economic Journal, 65, 264-281.

[12]   Fjell, K. and Heywood, J.S. (2002) Public Stackelberg Leadership in a Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Firms. Australian Economic Papers, 41, 267-281.

[13]   Han, L. (2012) Strategic Privatization and Trade Policies in an International Mixed Oligopoly. The Manchester School, 80, 580-602.

[14]   Matsumura, T. and Tomaru, Y. (2012) Market Structure and Privatization Policy under International Competition. Japanese Economic Review, 63, 244-258.

[15]   De Fraja, G. and Delbono, F. (1989) Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 302-311.

[16]   White, M.D. (1996) Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Subsidization. Economics Letters, 53, 189-195.

[17]   Du, N.H., Heywood, J.S. and Ye, G.L. (2013) Strategic Delegation in an Experimental Mixed Duopoly. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 91-100.

[18]   Huizinga, H. and Nielsen, S.B. (1997) Capital Income and Profit Taxation with Foreign Ownership of Firms. Journal of International Economics, 42, 149-165.

[19]   Ogawa, H. and Sanjo, Y. (2007) Location of Public Firm in the Presence of Multinational Firm: A Mixed Duopoly Approach. Australian Economic Papers, 46, 191-203.