OJS  Vol.5 No.1 , February 2015
Implicit Hypotheses Are Hidden Power Droppers in Family-Based Association Studies of Secondary Outcomes
Abstract: Family-based tests of association between a genetic marker and a disease constitute a common design to dissect the genetic architecture of complex traits. The FBAT software is one of the most popular tools to perform such studies. However, researchers are also often interested in the genetic contribution to a more specific manifestation of the phenotype (e.g. severe vs. non-severe form) known as a secondary outcome. Here, what we demonstrate is the limited power of the classical formulation of the FBAT statistic to detect the effect of genetic variants that influence a secondary outcome, in particular when these variants also impact on the onset of the disease, the primary outcome. We prove that this loss of power is driven by an implicit hypothesis, and we propose a derivation of the original FBAT statistic, free from this implicit hypothesis. Finally, we demonstrate analytically that our new statistic is robust and more powerful than FBAT for the detection of association between a genetic variant and a secondary outcome.
Cite this paper: Gaschignard, J. , Vincent, Q. , Jaïs, J. , Cobat, A. and Alcaïs, A. (2015) Implicit Hypotheses Are Hidden Power Droppers in Family-Based Association Studies of Secondary Outcomes. Open Journal of Statistics, 5, 35-45. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2015.51005.

[1]   Laird, N.M. and Lange, C. (2006) Family-Based Designs in the Age of Large-Scale Gene-Association Studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 385-394.

[2]   Chen, W.M. and Abecasis, G.R. (2007) Family-Based Association Tests for Genomewide Association Scans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81, 913-926.

[3]   Burdick, J.T., Chen, W.M., Abecasis, G.R. and Cheung, V.G. (2006) In Silico Methods for Inferring Genotypes in Pedigrees. Nature Genetics, 38, 1002-1004.

[4]   Vincent, Q., Alcais, A., Alter, A., Schurr, E. and Abel, L. (2006) Quantifying Genomic Imprinting in the Presence of Linkage. Biometrics, 62, 1071-1080.

[5]   Spielman, R.S., McGinnis, R.E. and Ewens, W.J. (1993) Transmission Test for Linkage Disequilibrium: The Insulin Gene Region and Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM). American Journal of Human Genetics, 52, 506-516.

[6]   Laird, N.M., Horvath, S. and Xu, X. (2000) Implementing a Unified Approach to Family-Based Tests of Association. Genetic Epidemiology, 19, S36-S42.<::AID-GEPI6>3.0.CO;2-M

[7]   Rabinowitz, D. and Laird, N. (2000) A Unified Approach to Adjusting Association Tests for Population Admixture with Arbitrary Pedigree Structure and Arbitrary Missing Marker Information. Human Heredity, 50, 211-223.

[8]   Lange, C. and Laird, N.M. (2002) Power Calculations for a General Class of Family-Based Association Tests: Dichotomous Traits. American Journal of Human Genetics, 71, 575-584.

[9]   Mira, M.T., Alcais, A., Van Thuc, N., Moraes, M.O., Di Flumeri, C., Hong Thai, V., Chi Phuong, M., Thu Huong, N., Ngoc Ba, N., Xuan Khoa, P., et al. (2004) Susceptibility to Leprosy Is Associated with PARK2 and PACRG. Nature, 427, 636-640.

[10]   Cobat, A., Gallant, C.J., Simkin, L., Black, G.F., Stanley, K., Hughes, J., Doherty, T.M., Hanekom, W.A., Eley, B., Jais, J.P., et al. (2009) Two Loci Control Tuberculin Skin Test Reactivity in an Area Hyperendemic for Tuberculosis. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 206, 2583-2591.

[11]   Knapp, M. (1999) The Transmission/Disequilibrium Test and Parental-Genotype Reconstruction: The Reconstruction-Combined Transmission/Disequilibrium Test. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64, 861-870.