SS  Vol.2 No.4 , June 2011
Comparison of the Five Different Methods in Arterial Diameter Measurement
Abstract
Background/Aims: In this study, the different types of arterial diameter measurement methods were com-pared with each other on rat model. Methods: The study was planned in three phases. In phase 1, all subjects (n = 30) underwent high resolution B-mode ultrasound examination and external diameter of the right com-mon carotid artery (RCCA) was measured. In phase 2, RCCA was explored. In phase 3, rats were put into three groups. Group 1 was kept at -20oC, group 2 was embedded in 4% formaldehyde solution. In group 3, circulatory system was filled with %20 latex solution. In all groups, digital image of the RCCA was taken after the processes mentioned above. Images were assessed by Image – Pro Plus software. Results: The greatest average diameter was observed in the high resolution B-mode ultrasound (phase 1). In group 1 and 2, direct measurement of the RCCA on living animal (phase 2) gave significantly wider diameter than those obtained at phase 3 in the same groups. Direct (phase 2) and latex (phase 3) measurements were equal in group 3. Conclusion: High resolution B-mode ultrasound gives larger, probably actual diameter of the artery. Latex injection results might correspond those encountered during operation.

Cite this paper
nullO. Babuccu, B. Tekerekoglu, H. Ozdemir, H. Besir and S. Gundogdu, "Comparison of the Five Different Methods in Arterial Diameter Measurement," Surgical Science, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2011, pp. 204-208. doi: 10.4236/ss.2011.24045.
References

[1]   B. Strauch, H.L. Yu, “Atlas of microvascular surgery: anatomy and operative approaches,” Thieme Medical publishers, Inc., New York, 1993.

[2]   S.J. Mathes, F. Nahai, “Reconstructive surgery: principles, anatomy and technique,” Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997.

[3]   D. Serafin, “Atlas of microsurgical composite tissue transplantation,” Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1996.

[4]   O. Babuccu, H. Ozdemir, M. Hosnuter, E. Kargi, A. Sogut, F.N. Ayoglu, “Cross-sectional internal diameters of radial, thoracodorsal, and dorsalis pedis arteries in children: relationship to subject sex, age, and body size,” J Reconstr Microsurg, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2006, pp. 49-52.

[5]   I.H. Peterson, R.E. Jensen, J Parnell, “Mechanical properties of arteries in vivo,” Circulation Research, Vol. 8, 1960, pp.622-639.

[6]   A. Munk, K. Darge, M. Wiesel, J. Troeger, “Diameter of the infrarenal aorta and the iliac arteries in children: ultrasound measurements,” Transplantation Vol. 73, No. 4, 2002, pp. 631-635.

[7]   H.C. Assen, A. de Roos, J. Vanderschoot, J.H. Reiber, “Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries,” Magn Reson Imaging, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000, pp. 13-22.

[8]   S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, T. Yamauchi, “Measurement of vascular diameter in vitro by automated software for CT angiography: effects of inner diameter, density of contrast medium, and convolution kernel,” Am J Roentgenol, Vol. 182, No. 5, 2004, pp.1313-1317.

[9]   R.W. Stadler, W.C. Karl, R.S. Lees, New methods for arterial diameter measurement from B-mode images,” Ultrasound Med Biol, Vol.22, No.1, 1996, pp. 25-34.

[10]   V.R. Newey, D.K. Nassiri, “Online artery diameter measurement in ultrasound images using artificial neural networks,” Ultrasound Med Biol, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2002, pp. 209-216.

[11]   A. Uehata, T. Matsuguchi, J.A. Bittl, et al, “Accuracy of electronic digital calipers compared with quantitative angiography in measuring coronary arterial diameter,” Circulation, Vol. 88, No.4 Pt 1, 1993, pp.1724-1729.

[12]   G.D. Rosson, L.H. Holton, R.P. Silverman, N.K. Singh, M.Y. Nahabedian, “Internal mammary perforators: a cadaver study,” J Reconstr Microsurg, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005, pp. 239-242.

[13]   I.K. Lukic, V. Gluncic, A. Marusic, “Extracranial braches of the middle meningeal artery” Clinical anatomy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2001, pp. 292-294.

[14]   O. Magden, M. Edizer, A. Atabey, V. Tayfur, I. Ergur, “Cadaveric study of the arterial anatomy of the upper lip,” Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol. 114, No. 7, 2004, pp. 355- 359.

[15]   K. Hwang, W.J. Lee, C.Y. Jung, I.H. Chung, “Cutaneous perforators of the upper arm and clinical applications,” J Reconstr Microsurg, Vol. 21, No. 7, 2005, pp.463-469.

[16]   K.Z. Tao, E.Y. Chen, R.M. Ji, R.S. Dang, “Anatomical study on arteries of fasciae in the forearm fasciocutaneous flap,” Clinical Anatomy, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2000, pp.1-5.

[17]   B.P. Thomas, C.R. Geddes, M. Tang, J. Williams, S.F. Morris, “The vascular basis of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap,” Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol. 116, No. 3, 2000, pp.818-822.

 
 
Top