ENG  Vol.3 No.6 , June 2011
Machinability Study of Titanium (Grade-5) Alloy Using Design of Experiment Technique
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of an experimental investigation into the effects of cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and approach angle in turning of titanium (Grade 5) alloy. A two-level factorial experiment has been used to accomplish the objective of the experimental study. The main cutting force, i.e. tangential force (Fc) and surface roughness (Ra) were the response variables investigated. The experimental results indicate that the proposed mathematical models suggested could adequately describe the performance indicators within the limits of the factors that are being investigated. The feed, cutting speed and depth of cut is the most significant factor that influences the surface roughness and the tangential force. However, there are other factors that provide secondary contributions to the performance indicators.

Cite this paper
nullK. Dass and S. Chauhan, "Machinability Study of Titanium (Grade-5) Alloy Using Design of Experiment Technique," Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 6, 2011, pp. 609-621. doi: 10.4236/eng.2011.36073.
References

[1]   H. Van Kann, “Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Plenum Press, New York, 1982, pp. 229-234.

[2]   J. R. Myers, H. B. Bomberger and F. H. Froes, “Corrosion Behavior and Use of Titanium and Its Alloys,” J. Met., Vol. 36, No. 10, 1984, pp. 50-60.

[3]   J. B. Borradile and R. H. Jeal, “Titanium Alloys 1-3,” 1982.

[4]   R. A. Wood and R. J. Favor, “Titanium Al-loys Handbook,” Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1972.

[5]   C. H. Che-Haron, A. Jawaid, “The Effect of Machining on Surface Integrity of Titanium Alloy Ti–6% Al-4% V.,” Journal of Ma-terials Processing Technology, Vol. 166, No. , 2005, pp. 188-192.

[6]   D. Umbrello, “Finite Element Simulation of Conventional and High Speed Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 196, No. 1-3, January 2008, pp. 79-87.

[7]   M. Y. Noordin, V. C. Venkatesh, S. Elting and A. Abdullah, “Application of Response Surface Methodology in Describing the Performance of Coated Carbide Tools When Turning AISI 1045 Steel,” Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 145, No. 1, 2004, pp. 46-58. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6

[8]   S. J. Heo, “Ma-chining Characteristics of Cemented Carbides in Micro Cutting with in SEM,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2004, pp. 35-42.

[9]   E. M. Trent and P. K. Wright, “Metal Cutting,” Butter-worth-Heinemann, 2000, pp. 9-95.

[10]   W. H. Yang and Y. S. Tarng, “Design Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Turn-ing Operations Based on the Taguchi Method,” Journal of Ma-terial Processing Technology, Vol. 84, No. 1-3, December 1998, pp. 122-129. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00079-X

[11]   J. P. Davim, “A Note on the Determination of Optimal Cutting Conditions on the Surface Finish Obtained in Turning Using,” Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 116, No. 2-3, October 2001, pp. 305-308.

[12]   D. C. Montgomery, “Design and Analysis of Experiments,” 4th Edition, Wiley, New York, 1997.

[13]   K. Kandananond, “The Determination of Empirical Model for Surface Roughness in Turning Process Using Design of Experiment,” WSEAS Transactions on Systems, Vol. 8, No. 10, October 2009, pp. .

[14]   M. C. Shaw, “Metal Cutting Prin-ciples,” Oxford University, Oxford, 1984.

[15]   M. Thomas, Y. Beauchamp, Y. A. Youssef, J. Masounave, “An Experimental Design for Surface Roughness and Built-Up Edge Formation in Lathe Dry Turning,” International Journal of Quality Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 167-180. doi:10.1108/13598539710170803

[16]   X. Wang and C. X. Feng, “Development of Empirical Models for Surface Rough-ness Prediction in Finish Turning,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2002, pp. 348-356. doi:10.1007/s001700200162

[17]   I. A. Choudhury and M. A. El-Baradie, “Surface Roughness Prediction in the Turning of High-Strength Steel by Factorial Design of Experiments,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 67, No. 1-3, May 1997, pp. 55-61. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02818-X

[18]   I. P. Arbizu and C. J. Luis Perez, “Surface Roughness Prediction by Factorial De-sign of Experiments in Turning Processes,” Journal of Materi-als Processing Technology, Vol. 143-144, December 2003, pp. 390-396. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00407-2

[19]   T. Ozel, T. K. Hsu and E. Zeren, “Effects of Cutting Edge Geometry, Work Piece Hardness, Feed Rate and Cutting Speed on Surface Roughness and Forces in Finish Turning of Hardened AISI H13 Steel”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 262-269. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1878-5

[20]   Y. Sahin and A. R. Mo-torcu, “Surface Roughness Model for Machining Mild Steel with Coated Carbide Tool,” Materials & Design, Vol. 26, No. 4, June 2005, pp. 321- 326. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2004.06.015

[21]   Y. Sun, Y. Liang and R. Du, “Micro Milling: Simulation of Surface Generation and Experimental Analysis of Surface Roughness,” WSEAS Trans-actions on Systems, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1293-1300.

[22]   H. Oktem, T. Erzurmlu and H. Kurtaran, “Application of Response Surface Methodology in the Optimization of Cutting Conditions for Surface Roughness,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 170, No. 1-2, December 2005, pp. 11-16. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.096

[23]   J. Grum and J. M. Slab, “The Use of Factorial Design and Response Surface Methodology for Fast Determination of Optimal Heat Treat-ment Conditions of Different Ni-Co- Mo Surface Layers,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 155-156, November 2004, pp. 2026- 2032. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.220

[24]   K. Y. Kung, C. H. Hsu, P. C. Chen and J. R. Lin, “Effects of Surface Roughness on Dynamic Squeeze Behavior of Partial Journal Bearings with Finite Width,” WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2004, pp. 204-209.

[25]   J. P. Davim, “Design of Opti-mization of Cutting Parameters for Turning Metal Matrix Composites Based on the Orthogonal Arrays,” Journal of Ma-terials Processing Technology, Vol. 132, No. 1-3, January 2003, pp. 340- 344. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00946-9

 
 
Top