IJIS  Vol.5 No.2 , January 2015
A Physiologically-Based Adaptive Three-Gaussian Function Model for Image Enhancement
Abstract: Image enhancement is an important pre-processing step for various image processing applications. In this paper, we proposed a physiologically-based adaptive three-Gaussian model for image enhancement. Comparing to the standard three-Gaussian model inspired by the spatial structure of the receptive field (RF) of the retinal ganglion cells, the proposed model can dynamically adjust its parameters according to the local image luminance and contrast based on the physiological findings. Experimental results on several images show that the proposed adaptive three-Gaussian model achieves better performance than the classical method of histogram equalization and the standard three-Gaussian model.
Cite this paper: Xu, Z. , Yang, K. and Li, Y. (2015) A Physiologically-Based Adaptive Three-Gaussian Function Model for Image Enhancement. International Journal of Intelligence Science, 5, 72-79. doi: 10.4236/ijis.2015.52007.

[1]   Rodieck, R.W. (1965) Quantitative Analysis of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cell Response to Visual Stimuli. Vision Research, 5, 538-601.

[2]   Li, C.I., Chang, Y.J., Chen, P.S., Hsu, H.C. and Wang, H. (1979) Role of Sustained Neurones of Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in Processing Luminance Information. Scientia Sinica, 22, 359-371.

[3]   Ramachandran, V.S. (1988) Perceiving Shape from Shading. Scientific American, 259, 76-83.

[4]   Li, C.-Y., Zhou, Y.-X., Pei, X., Qiu, F.-T., Tang, C.-Q. and Xu, X.-Z. (1992) Extensive Disinhibitory Region beyond the Classical Receptive Field of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells. Vision Research, 32, 219-228.

[5]   Li, C.-Y., Pei, X., Zhow, Y.-X. and Von Mitzlaff, H.-C. (1991) Role of the Extensive Area outside the X-Cell Receptive Field in Brightness Information Transmission. Vision Research, 31, 1529-1540.

[6]   Keil, M.S., Cristobal, G. and Neumann, H. (2001) A Neurodynamical Retinal Network Based on Reaction-Diffusion Systems. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Palermo, 26-28 September 2011, 209-214.

[7]   Smirnakis, S.M., Berry, M.J., Warland, D.K., Bialek, W. and Meister, M. (1997) Adaptation of Retinal Processing to Image Contrast and Spatial Scale. Nature, 386, 69-73.

[8]   Nolt, M.J., Kumbhani, R.D. and Palmer, L.A. (2004) Contrast-Dependent Spatial Summation in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Retina of the Cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1708-1717.

[9]   Lesica, N.A., Jin, J.H., Weng, C., Yeh, C.-I, Butts, D.A., Stanley, G.B., et al. (2007) Adaptation to Stimulus Contrast and Correlations during Natural Visual Stimulation. Neuron, 55, 479-491.

[10]   Kapadia, M.K., Westheimer, G. and Gilbert, C.D. (1999) Dynamics of Spatial Summation in Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 12073-12078.

[11]   Song, X.-M. and Li, C.-Y. (2008) Contrast-Dependent and Contrast- Independent Spatial Summation of Primary Visual Cortical Neurons of the Cat. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 331-336.

[12]   Chen, K., Song, X.-M. and Li, C.-Y. (2013) Contrast-Dependent Variations in the Excitatory Classical Receptive Field and Suppressive Nonclassical Receptive Field of Cat Primary Visual Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 283-292.

[13]   Agaian, S.S., Panetta, K. and Grigoryan, A.M. (2000) A New Measure of Image Enhancement. IASTED International Conference on Signal Processing & Communication, Marbella, September 2000, 19-22.

[14]   Fiete, R.D. and Tantalo, T. (2001) Comparison of SNR Image Quality Metrics for Remote Sensing Systems. Optical Engineering, 40, 574-585.