JSS  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2015
Mapping and Evaluating Regional University-Industry Knowledge Flow through Patent Licensing
ABSTRACT
Different regions had various kinds of academic resources and industries competitors. The knowledge and innovation output generated by researchers in academy had been transferred into industries through patent licensing. Using the patent licensing document analyzing method and the mapping technique, the academic-industry knowledge flowing patterns of different regions in China had been discovered and visualized in maps. The regional performance of academic-industry knowledge transfer was rather mixed and unbalanced. Based on the licensing performance data, this paper had also generated a 4 × 4 block matrix as evaluation tool and ranked 28 Chinese regions into 8 levels according to their academic licensing performance. Further suggestions and advice had been given for regions in different levels.

Cite this paper
Gao, X. , Chen, Y. , Song, W. , Peng, X. and Song, X. (2015) Mapping and Evaluating Regional University-Industry Knowledge Flow through Patent Licensing. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 1-12. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.31001.
References
[1]   Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business Press, Boston.

[2]   Agrawal, A. (2001) University-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions. Inter- national Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00069

[3]   Salter, A.J. and Martin, B.R. (2001) The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review. Research Policy, 30, 509-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3

[4]   Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2002) Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273

[5]   Colyvas, J., et al. (2002) How Do University Inventions Get into Practice? Management Science, 48, 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272

[6]   Shane, S. (2002) Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT. Management Science, 48, 122-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.122.14281

[7]   Bozeman, B. (2000) Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research Policy, 29, 627-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1

[8]   Mowery, D.C. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2012) Academic Patent Quality and Quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy, 31, 399-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0

[9]   Arrow, K.J. (1962) The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2295952

[10]   Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[11]   Buenstorf, G. and Schacht, A. (2013) We Need to Talk—Or Do We? Geographic Distance and the Commercialization of Technologies from Public Research. Research Policy, 42, 465-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.010

[12]   Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1992) Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w3993

[13]   Mansfield, E. and Lee, J.-Y. (1996) The Modern University: Contributor to Industrial Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support. Research Policy, 25, 1047-1058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1

[14]   Adams, J.D. (2002) Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 253-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/2.3.253

[15]   Audretsch, D.B. and Stephan, P.E. (1996) Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology. The Ameri- can Economic Review, 86, 641-652.

[16]   Grotz, R. and Braun, B. (1997) Territorial or Trans-Territorial Networking: Spatial Aspects of Technology-Oriented Cooperation within the German Mechanical Engineering Industry. Regional Studies, 31, 545-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409750131686

[17]   Brown, J.E. and Hendry, C. (1998) Industrial Districts and Supply Chains as Vehicles for Managerial and Organiza- tional Learning. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27, 127-157.

[18]   Scott, A.J. (1992) The Role of Large Producers in Industrial Districts: A Case Study of High Technology Systems Houses in Southern California. Regional Studies, 26, 265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409212331346961

[19]   Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E. and Laville, F. (2003) Potential Science-Technology Spillovers in Regions: An Insight on Geographic Co-Location of Knowledge Activities in the EU. Scientometrics, 57, 295-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024145920210

[20]   Henderson, B. (1970) The Product Portfolio. The Boston Consulting Group, Boston.

 
 
Top