Back
 OJF  Vol.5 No.1 , January 2015
Influence of Human Disturbance to the Small Mammal Communities in the Forests
Abstract: Small mammals have been proposed playing an important role in the energy flow and regeneration of forest ecosystems. We compared species richness, diversity (H’) of small mammal communities and abundance of six dominant species of small mammals in disturbed and protected forests (four age classes: 6 - 10, 11 - 15, 16 - 20 and 31 - 40 years old) in China. We also investigated the structural variables (such as species richness, cover rate and abundance of shrubs and grasses) in the bottom layer, which considered to be important for small mammals and might be altered by human disturbance. The relationships between small mammals and these structural variables were examined to determine the potential effects of human disturbance on the small mammals in the restored forests. Our results indicated that the structure and composition of the vegetation in the bottom layer were simplified by human disturbance, while the abundance and cover rate of grasses were significantly increased. Although no significant differences were observed in species richness of small mammals between the protected and disturbed forests at the same age, the diversity index of small mammals in the protected forests was always significantly higher than in the disturbed forests. Regression showed that the species richness and diversity of small mammals increased with the species richness of shrubs, and was negatively correlated to the cover rate of grasses in the bottom layer. Human disturbance increased the total abundance of small mammals, and the increased cover rate of grasses in the bottom layer was beneficial to the abundance of small mammals. Obvious succession of small mammal communities occurred as the protected forest aged. In the protected forests, small ground-dwelling mammals (A. chevrieri, E. miletus and M. pahari) were the dominant species in the younger forests. Other mammals (T. belangeri, D. pernyi and C. erythraeus) gradually became the dominant species as the protected forests aged. However, in the disturbed forests, the smaller ground-dwelling mammals (T. belangeri, D. pernyi and C. erythraeus) were always the dominant species at all ages of the disturbed forests. Regression indicated that the cover rate of grasses in the bottom layer was beneficial to the three smaller body size and ground-dwelling small mammal species, while the shrubs were beneficial to the three bigger body size mammal species.
Cite this paper: Men, X. , Guo, X. , Dong, W. , Ding, N. and Qian, T. (2015) Influence of Human Disturbance to the Small Mammal Communities in the Forests. Open Journal of Forestry, 5, 1-9. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2015.51001.
References

[1]   Adler, G. H. (1985). Habitat Selection and Species Interactions: An Experimental Analysis with Small Mammal Population. Oikos, 45, 380-390.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565574

[2]   Batzli, G. O., & Lesieutre, C. (1995). Community Organization of Arvicoline Rodents in Northern Alaska. Oikos, 72, 88-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546042

[3]   Bowman, J. C., Sleep, D., Forbes, G. J., & Edwards, M. (2000). The Association of Small Mammals with Coarse Woody Debris at Log and Stand Scales. Forest Ecology and Management, 129, 119-124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00152-8

[4]   Briggs, J. S., Vander Wall, S. B., & Jenkins, S. H. (2009). Forest Rodents Provide Directed Dispersal of Jeffrey Pine Seeds. Ecology, 90, 675-687.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-0542.1

[5]   Buckner, C. H. (1966). The Role of Vertebrate Predation in Biological Control of Forest Insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 11, 449-470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.11.010166.002313

[6]   Butts, S. R., & McComb, W. C. (2000). Associations of Forest-Floor Vertebrates with Coarse Woody Debris in Managed Forests of Western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 95-104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3802978

[7]   Carey, A. B., & Harrington, C. A. (2001). Small Mammals in Young Forests: Implications for Management for Sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management, 154, 289-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00638-1

[8]   Carey, A. B., & Johnson, M. L. (1995). Small Mammals in Managed, Naturally Young, and Old-Growth Forests. Ecological Applications, 5, 336-352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942026

[9]   Carey, A. B., Kershner, J., Biswell, B., & DeToledo, L. D. (1999). Ecological Scale and Forest Development: Squirrels, Dietary Fungi, and Vascular Plants in Managed and Unmanaged Forests. Wildlife Monographs, 142, 3-71.

[10]   Costanza, R., Daly, H., Folke, C., Hawken, P., Holling, C. S., McMichael, A. J. et al. (2000). Managing Our Environmental Portfolio. Biosci, 50, 149-155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0149:MOEP]2.3.CO;2

[11]   Dong, X. B., You, D. K., Chang, G. L., & Qiu, L. X. (2003). Control of the Damage of Forest Rodents in China. Forest Pest and Disease, 22, 36-40.

[12]   Dueser, R. D., & Shugart Jr., H. H. (1978). Niche Pattern in a Forest-Floor Small-Mammal Fauna. Ecology, 60, 108-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936473

[13]   Dueser, R. D., & Shugart Jr., H. H. (1979). Microhabitats in a Forest-Floor Small-Mammal Fauna. Ecology, 59, 89-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936634

[14]   Ecke, F., Logren, O., & Sorlin, D. (2002). Population Dynamics of Small Mammals in Relation to Forest Age and Structural Habitat Factors in Northern Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 781-792.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00759.x

[15]   Ericson, L. (1977). The Influence of Voles and Lemmings on the Vegetation in a Coniferous Forest during a 4-Year Period in Northern Sweden. Sweden: Univeristy of Umeêa, 114 p.

[16]   Ferreira, S. M., & VanAarde, R. J. (1996). Changes in Community Characteristics of Small Mammals in Rehabilitating Coastal Dune Forests in Northern KwaZulu/Natal. African Journal of Ecology, 34, 113-130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1996.tb00606.x

[17]   Folke, C., Holling, C. S., & Perrings, C. (1996). Biological Diversity, Ecosystems, and the Human Scale. Ecological Applications, 6, 1018-1024.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2269584

[18]   Gebczynska, Z. (1983). Feeding Habits. Acta Theriologica, 28, 40-49.

[19]   Haddad, N. M., Tilman, D., Haarstad, J., Ritchie, M., & Knops, J. M. (2001). Contrasting Effects of Plant Richness and Composition on Insect Communities: A Field Experiment. The American Naturalist, 158, 17-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/320866

[20]   Hansson, L. (1988). Grazing Impact by Small Rodents in a Steep Cyclicity Gradient. Oikos, 51, 31-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565804

[21]   Hornfeldt, B., Carlsson, B. G., Lofgren, O., & Eklund, U. (1990). Effects of Cyclic Food Supply on Breeding Performance in Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 522-530.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z90-077

[22]   Kelt, D. A. (2000). Small Mammal Communities in Rainforest Fragments in Central Southern Chile. Biological Conservation, 92, 345-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00107-X

[23]   Kirkland Jr., G. L. (1990). Patterns of Initial Small Mammal Community Change after Clearcutting of Temperate North American Forests. Oikos, 59, 313-320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545141

[24]   Krebs, C. J., & Myers, J. H. (1974). Population Cycles in Small Mammals. Advances in Ecological Research, 8, 267-339.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60280-9

[25]   Liu, L. S., Liu, J. K., Luo, M. C., & Wang, Y. X. (2003). Study on Existing Issues of National-Level Nature Reserves in Yunnan Province. Problems of Forestry Economics, 23, 146-152.

[26]   Loeb, S. C. (1999). Responses of Small Mammals to Coarse Woody Debris in a Southeastern Pine Forest. Journal of Mammalogy, 80, 460-471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1383293

[27]   Manning, J. A., & Edge, W. D. (2008). Small Mammal Responses to Fine Woody Debris and Forest Fuel Reduction in Southwest Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 625-632.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2005-508

[28]   McCay, T. S. (2000). Use of Woody Debris by Cotton Mice (Peromyscus gossypinus) in a Southeastern Pine Forest. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 527-535.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0527:UOWDBC>2.0.CO;2

[29]   McCay, T. S., & Komoroski, M. J. (2004). Demographic Response of Shrews to Removal of Coarse Woody Debris in a Managed Pine Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 189, 387-395.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.005

[30]   Men, X., Guo, X., Erdal, N. Y., Dong, W., & Qian, T. (2006). Relationship between Small Mammal Community and Ecological Factors of Pine Plantations in Dali, Yunnan Province. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 52, 215-223.

[31]   Mengak, M. T., & Guynn Jr., D. C. (2003). Small Mammal Microhabitat Use on Young Loblolly Pine Regeneration Areas. Forest Ecology and Management, 173, 309-317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00008-7

[32]   Mengak, M. T., Guynn Jr., D. C., & VanLear, D. H. (1989). Ecological Implications of Loblolly Pine Regeneration for Small Mammal Communities. Forest Science, 35, 503-504.

[33]   Morris, D. W. (1997). Optimally Foraging Deer Mice in Prairie Mosaics: A Test of Habitat Theory and Absence of Landscape Effects. Oikos, 80, 31-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546513

[34]   Niedziallkowska, M., Konczak, J., Czarnomska, S., & Jedrzejewska, B. (2010). Species Diversity and Abundance of Small Mammals in Relation to Forest Productivity in Northeast Poland. Ecoscience, 17, 109-119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2980/17-1-3310

[35]   Pearce, J., & Venier, L. (2005). Small Mammals as Bioindicators of Sustainable Boreal Forest Management. Forest Ecology and Management, 208, 153-175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.024

[36]   Plumpter, A. J. (2000). Monitoring Small Mammal Populations with Line Transect Techniques in African Forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 356-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00499.x

[37]   Saitoh, T., & Nakatsu, A. (1997). The Impact of Forestry on the Small Rodent Community of Hokkaido, Japan. Mammal Study, 22, 27-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3106/mammalstudy.22.27

[38]   Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 144 p.

[39]   Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163, 688.

[40]   Sullivan, T. P., & Sullivan, D. S. (2001). Influence of Variable Retention Harvest on Forest Ecosystems. II. Diversity and Population Dynamics of Small Mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 1234-1252.

[41]   Sullivan, T. P., Sullivan, D. S., & Lindgren, P. M. F. (2000). Small Mammals and Stand Structure in Young Pine, Seed-Tree, and Old-Growth Forest, Southwest Canada. Ecological Applications, 10, 1367-1383.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1367:SMASSI]2.0.CO;2

[42]   Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielborger, K., Wichmann, M. C., & Schwager, M. (2004). Animal Species Diversity Driven by Habitat Heterogeneity/Diversity: The Importance of Keystone Structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 79-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x

[43]   Ure, D. C., & Master, C. (1982). Mycophagy of Red-Backed Voles in Oregon and Washington. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60, 3307-3315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z82-419

[44]   Vander Wall, S. B. (1995). The Effects of Seed Value on the Caching Behavior of Yellow Pine Chipmunks. Oikos, 74, 533537.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545999

[45]   Vander Wall, S. B. (1997). Dispersal of Singleleaf Pinon Pine (Pinus monophylla) by Seed-Caching Rodents. Journal of Mammalogy, 78, 181-191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1382651

[46]   Wells, K., Corlett, R. T., Lakim, M. B., Kalko, E. K. V., & Pfeiffer. M. (2009). Seed Consumption by Small Mammals from Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25, 555-558.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409990058

[47]   Yahner, R. H. (1986). Microhabitat Use by Small Mammals in Even-Aged Forest Stands. American Midland Naturalist, 115, 174-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2425847

 
 
Top