OJPS  Vol.5 No.1 , January 2015
Political Modernisation: The Rule of Law Perspective on Good Governance
Author(s) Jan-Erik Lane
ABSTRACT
The United Nations, the WB as well as the IMF speak much of “good governance”, but what is the meaning and reference of this elusive expression? In this paper, I will link it with the concept(s) of rule of law. Rule of law notions are spreading around the globe, being relevant for the transformation of monarchies and one-party states. Thus, world media are now reporting that for instance China’s leadership is seriously debating making state reforms that would be conducive to more of the rule of law in the country. This is not be interpreted as a push towards western democracy. To clarify the relation between rule of law and competitive party democracy, this paper presents an enquiry into rule of law I and rule of law II. This distinction has a long history in political thought and constitutional developments. Data from the encompassing World Bank Governance project is used to validate these concepts referentially.

Cite this paper
Lane, J. (2015) Political Modernisation: The Rule of Law Perspective on Good Governance. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 13-25. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2015.51002.
References
[1]   Ackere, A. (1993) The Principal/Agent Paradigm: Its Relevance to Various Functional Fields. European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 83-103.

[2]   Althaus, C. (1997) The Application of Agency Theory to Public Sector Management. In G. Davis, B. Sullivan, & A. Yeatman (Eds.), The New Contractualism (pp. 137-153). Melbourne: Macmillan.

[3]   Arrow, K. (1985) The Economics of Agency. In J. Pratt, & R. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (pp. 37-51). Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press.

[4]   Barro, R. J. (1973) The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model. Public Choice, 14, 19-42.

[5]   Besley, T. (2006) Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford U.P.

[6]   Brazier, R. (1990) Constitutional and Administrative Law. London: Penguin Books.

[7]   Burns, J. H., & Goldie, M. (Eds.) (1991) The Cambridge History of Political Thought (pp.1450-1700). New York: Cambridge University Press.

[8]   Cooter, R. D., & Ulen, T. (2011) Law and Economics. New York: Pearson.

[9]   Ferejohn, J. (1986) Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice, 30, 5-25.

[10]   Ferejohn, J., & Shipa, C. (1990) Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6, 1-20.

[11]   Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (2005). Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

[12]   Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1983). An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem. Econometrica, 51, 7-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912246

[13]   Helland, L., & S?rensen, R. J. (2009). Hvorforoverleverpolitiskkorrupsjon i representative demokratier. Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 25, 219-236.

[14]   Jowell, J. (1994). The Rule of Law Today. In Jowell and Oliver, op.cit., 57-78.

[15]   Jowell, J., & Oliver, D. (Eds.) (1994). The Changing Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[16]   Kant, I. (1974). The Philosophy of Law. Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley.

[17]   Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Working Paper No. 5430.

[18]   Kelsen, H. (1961). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell & Russell.

[19]   Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[20]   Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[21]   Lloyd, D. (1991a). The Idea of Law. London: Penguin Books.

[22]   Lloyd, H. A. (1991b). “Constitutionalism”. In Burns and Goldie. op.cit., 254-297.

[23]   McIlwain, C. H. (1958). Constitutionalism, Ancient and Modern. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

[24]   Meredith, M. (1997). The State of Africa. London: Free Press.

[25]   Neumann, F. L. (1986). The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern Society. Berg: Leamington Spa.

[26]   Pennock, J. R., & Chapman, J. W. (Eds.) (1979). Constitutionalism. New York: New York University Press.

[27]   Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003). The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[28]   Rao, P. K. (2002). The Economics of Transaction Costs. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230597686

[29]   Rasmusen, E. (2006). Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

[30]   Rees, R. (1985). The Theory of Principal and Agent. Bulletin of Economic Research, 37, 3-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1985.tb00179.x

[31]   Reiss, H. (Ed.) (1970). Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[32]   Riley, P. (1983). Kant’s Political Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld Publishers.

[33]   Ross, S. A. (1973). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134-139.

[34]   Sappington, D. (1991). Incentives in Principal Agent Relationships. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 45-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.45

[35]   Schw?bel, C. E. J. (2011). Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective. Leiden: MartinusNijhoff.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004191150.i-205

[36]   Tierney, B. (1982). Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought 1150-1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558627

[37]   Vile, M. J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[38]   von Mohl, R. (1832). Die Polizei-Wissenschaftnach den Grundsatzen des Rechtstaates. Zweiteumgearbeitete Auflage. German Edition by British Library, Historical Print Editions (2011).

[39]   Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[40]   Weingast, B. (1989). The Political Institutions of Representative Government: Legislatures. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, 693-703. Reprinted In E. Furubotn, & R. Richter (Eds.), The New Institutional Economics. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mokr (Paul Siebeck) and College Station: Texas A&M Press, 1991.

[41]   White, W. D. (1992). Information and the Control of Agents. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, 111-117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90056-H

[42]   World Bank (2012). Governance Project.
http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/

[43]   Wormuth, F. D. (1949). The Origins of Modern Constitutionalism. New York: Harper.

 
 
Top