AJPS  Vol.6 No.1 , January 2015
Physico-Chemical Analysis and Polarization Value Estimation of Raw Sugar from Refining Point of View
Abstract: This study was particularly designed to evaluate the physico-chemical parameters and polarization value of raw sugar which ultimately affect the filterability of raw sugar. Six different raw sugar samples were collected from the local industries and were evaluated for the physico-chemical and polarization value. The physico-chemical characteristics of sugar including moisture, reducing sugar, ash contents, size of crystals and color constituents were assessed. The results obtained from physico-chemical analysis showed that these parameters were affected significantly among the samples of raw sugar. The ash contents were found to be decreasing for the samples in the order of T6 > T1T2T5 > T3T4. The values for the polarization were significantly the highest in sample T5, T2 and T1 followed by sample T4 and T6 while the lowest values were recorded for sample T3. It can be concluded from the results that sample T4 was observed to have a good quality while sample T6 had the opposite result to that of sample T4 and was considered to have a very low quality.
Cite this paper: -Din, Z. and Rasool, G. (2015) Physico-Chemical Analysis and Polarization Value Estimation of Raw Sugar from Refining Point of View. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 1-5. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.61001.

[1]   Javaid, G.S., Bhatti, M.B. Rashid, K. and Khalid, M. (2011) To Introduce the Raw Sugar Refinery, Its Operational Concept and Quality Prespective in Pakistan. Life Science International Journal, 5, 2053-2062.

[2]   Ali, F.G., Chattha, A.A. and Iqbal, M.A. (2001) Some Fundamental Causes of Low Sugar Recovery and Vital Approach for Its Improvement. Pakistan Sugarcane Journal, 16, 56-61.

[3]   GOP (2009-2010) Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

[4]   ICUMSA Methods (2007) International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. 234-241.

[5]   AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th Edition, Arlington.

[6]   Steel, R., Torrie, J. and Dickey, D. (1997) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York.

[7]   Chen, J.C.P. and Chou, C.C. (1993) Cane Sugar Handbook: A Manual for Cane Sugar Manufacturer and Chemists. John Willey and Sons, Inc., New York, 401-403.

[8]   Chauhan, M.K., Varun, Chaudhary, S., Kumar, S. and Samar (2011) Life Cycle Assessment of Sugar Industry Review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reservations, 15, 3445-3453.

[9]   Gyura, J., Sere, Z., Vatai, G. and Molnar, E.B. (2007) Separation of Non-Sucrose Compounds from the Syrup of Sugar Beet Processing by Ultra and Nano-Filtration Using Polymer Membranes. Desalination, 148, 49-56.

[10]   Argaw, G.A., Alport, M.J. and Malivga, S.B. (2006) Automatic Measurement of Crystal Size Distribution Using Image Processing. Processing South African Sugar Technology Association, 80, 399-411.

[11]   Saska, M. (1989) Composition of 1988 Lousiana Final Molasses. Sugar Journal, 30, 13-15.