MSA  Vol.5 No.14 , December 2014
Microscopic Characterisation of Pinus sylvestris Cell Structures under Compression Loading
ABSTRACT
This study is mainly focused on the 3D mechanical cell deformations of 20 × 20 × 60 mm sized softwood specimens under 35 - 40 MPa compression loading at room temperature of 20?C. The moisture content of the specimens was 6% - 7%. The data of microscopic images were measured and compared in terms of the permanently degenerated individual cell structures each in micro-scale . 3D cell deformations of tissues were observed with a magnification of (×100) - (×1500) and in the range of 3.0 - 5.0 kV voltage under the SEM microscope. The specimens were examined under magnification and photographed before and after the compression loading applied parallel to the grain angles to the wood samples. Specimens were painted with gold liquid (12 × 12 × 12 mm sized specimens) in obtaining the SEM images. Under the SEM, these specimens were photographed and lengths between the cell walls ranged between 15 to 40 micrometers. In this study, relative deformations of pinewood cells were determined statistically considering the percentage permanent deformation under the compression loading. It was performed by using knowledge of structural mechanics, considering the measurement of permanent deformation in honeycomb-pinewood structure material.

Cite this paper
Günay, E. , Golmohammadi, H. and Kaya, Ş. (2014) Microscopic Characterisation of Pinus sylvestris Cell Structures under Compression Loading. Materials Sciences and Applications, 5, 1060-1073. doi: 10.4236/msa.2014.514109.
References
[1]   Miksic, A., Myntti, M., Koivisto, J., Salminen, L. and Alava, M. (2013) Effect of Fatigue and Annual Rings’ Orientation on Mechanical Properties of Wood under Cross-Grain Uniaxial Compression. Wood Science and Technology, 47, 1117-1133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0561-8

[2]   Hassel, B.I., Modén, C.S. and Berglund, L.A. (2009) Functional Gradient Effects Explain the Low Transverse Shear Modulus in Spruce Full Field Strain Data and a Micromechanics Model. Composites Science and Technology, 69, 2491-2496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.025

[3]   Modén, C.S. and Berglund, L.A. (2008) A Two-Phase Annual Ring Model of Transverse Anisotropy in Softwoods. Composites Science and Technology, 68, 3020-3026.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.022

[4]   Lu, G., Lu, G.Q. and Xiao, Z.M. (1999) Mechanical Properties of Porous Materials. Journal of Porous Materials, 6, 359-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009669730778

[5]   Madsen, B. and Gamstedt, E.K. (2013) Wood versus Plant Fibers: Similarities and Differences in Composite Applications. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, Article ID: 564346.

[6]   Fratzl, P., Burgert, I. and Keckes, J. (2004) Mechanical Model for the Deformation of the Wood Cell Wall. Zeitschrift fur Metallkunde Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering, 95, 579-584.

[7]   Burgert, I., Keckes, J. and Fratzl, P. (2006) Mechanics of the Wood Cell Wall. In: Stokke, D.D. and Groom, L.H., Eds., Characterization of the Cellulosic Cell Wall, Wiley, Grand Lake, 30-37.

[8]   Flores, E.S., Souza Neto, E.A. and Pearce, S.C. (2011) A Large Strain Computational Multi-Scale Model for the Dissipative Behaviour of Wood Cell-Wall. Computational Materials Science, 50, 1202-1211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.11.023

[9]   Qing, H. and Mishnaevsky Jr., L. (2010) 3D Multiscale Micromechanical Model of Wood: From Annual Rings to Microfibrils. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 47, 1253-1267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.01.014

[10]   Moëll, M.K. and Minoru Fujita, M. (2004) Fourier Transform Methods in Image Analysis of Compression Wood at the Cellular Level. IAWA Journal, 25, 311-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000368

[11]   Kaya, S.T. (2007) Determination of the Failure Curve of Transversely Isotropic Fiber Composite Pinewood (Pinus Sylvestris) by the Help of Experimental Studies. M.Sc. Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Science and Technology, Turkey.

[12]   Wiedenhoeft, A. (2014) Structure and Function of Wood: Wood Handbook. Chapter 3, Forest Products Library.
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_03.pdf.htm

[13]   Esau, K. (1977) Anatomy of the Seed Plants. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York.

[14]   Raven, P., Evert, R. and Eichhorn, S. (1999) Biology of Plants. 6th Edition, W.H. Freeman & Company, New York.

[15]   Dickison, W. (2000) Integrative Plant Anatomy. Academic Press, New York.

[16]   Côté, W.A. (1967) Wood Ultrastructure. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

[17]   Josza, L.A. and Middleton, G.R. (1994) Wood Quality Attributes and Their Practical Implications. Forintek Canada Corp., 2655 East Mall, Vancouver BC Canada V6T 1W5.

[18]   Logan, J.D. (2014) Sensitivity to Fundamental Wood Properties in the Metriguard Model 7200 HCLT and the CLT.
http://www.metriguard.com/fiber.htm

[19]   Gardiner, B., Barnett, J., Saranpaa, P. and Gril, J. (2014) The Biology of Reaction Wood. (eBook) Springer, London.
http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/forestry/book/978-3-642-10813-6

 
 
Top