Back
 AD  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2015
Two Iron-Age Settlement Sites in Germany: From Field Work via Numerical Modeling towards an Improved Interpretation
Georg Kaufmann1*, Burkart Burkart Ullrich2, Philipp Hoelzmann3
Show more
Abstract: Geophysical exploration of archaeological sites has been a successful tool becoming more and more popular in the last decades. Many archaeological features can be detected with magnetic gradiometry (MGR), such as fire places, burned loam, metal artifacts, or other remnants, which produce a remanent magnetic signal detectable on the surface. However, as magnetic minerals are also present in natural settings, e.g. sedimentary and magmatic rocks and sediments derived from these host rocks, the MGR signal from archaeological artifacts is often embedded in a broader geomorphological signal, which makes separation of the different sources difficult. We provide geophysical data from two complex archaeological sites in northern Germany, which have been obtained with different methods, e.g. magnetic gradiometry (MGR), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), electro-magnetic mapping (EM), and ground-penetrating radar (GPR). The combination of geophysical methods maps different material properties of both the geomorphological and the archaeological sources. We then use the three-dimensional modeling tool PREDICTOR to analyze the sources for the geophysical signals, e.g. the dominant signal in Leimbach, resulting from infill of palaeo-channels in the settlement area, and fire places as well as shafts in the hill fort of Lossow. The model prediction enables us to quantify the structures in the sub-surface and therefore helps to unravel complex situations often present in archaeological excavations.
Keywords: Multi-Geophysical Prospection, Magnetic Gradiometry, Archaeo-Geophysics, Modelling, Field Work
Cite this paper: Kaufmann, G. , Burkart Ullrich, B. and Hoelzmann, P. (2015) Two Iron-Age Settlement Sites in Germany: From Field Work via Numerical Modeling towards an Improved Interpretation. Archaeological Discovery, 3, 1-14. doi: 10.4236/ad.2015.31001.
References

[1]   Agahd, R. (1911). Der Burgwall von Lossow bei Frankfurt a. O. Prähist. Zeitschr. 3.

[2]   Aspinall, A., Gaffney, C., & Schmidt, A. (2008). Magnetometry for Archaeologists (Geophysical Methods for Archaeology). Plymouth: Altamira Press.

[3]   Beilke-Voigt, I. (2010). Alt bekannt und neu untersucht. In I. Beilke-Voigt, & F. Schopper (Eds.), Lossow-Alte Forschungen und neue Projekte, Materialien zur Archäologie in Brandenburg, Bd. 4, Lossower Forschungen Bd. 1. Vol. Band 4 (112 p). Rahden/Westfalen.

[4]   Fassbinder, J. (2007). Einführung in die Archäometrie. Springer, Ch. Unter Acker und Wadi: Magnetometerprospektion in der Archäologie (pp. 54-75).

[5]   Fassbinder, J., Stanjek, H., & Vali, H. (1990). Occurrence of Magnetic Bacteria in Soil. Nature, 343, 161-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/343161a0

[6]   Fialova, H., Maier, G., Petrovsky, E., Kapick, A., Boyko, T., Scholger, R., & Team, M. (2006). Magnetic Properties of Soils from Sites with Different Geological and Environmental Settings. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 59, 273-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.10.006

[7]   Freibothe, R. (2011). Archäologische Erkundung mit dem Metalldetektor EMD1: Vergleichende Fallstudien im Rahmen des Topoi-Exzellenz Clusters. Master’s Thesis, TU Berlin.

[8]   Freibothe, R., Ullrich, B., Beilke-Voigt, I., Kaufmann, G., & Kirsch, R. (2011). Multigeophysikalische Prospektion am Burgwall Lossow. DGG Mitteilungen, 2, 52-58.

[9]   Griesa, S. (1989). Archäologie in der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, Denkmale und Funde, Band 2. Ch. Lossow, Ot. von Frankfurt (Oder) (20 p).

[10]   Hoelzmann, P., Rauchfuss, B., Ullrich, B., Bebermeier, W., Kaufmann, G., Schütt, B., & Meyer, M. (2012). Coupling of Geomorphological, Geophysical, Geochemical and Archaeological Spatial Data for a Study of the Interface of the Latène and Przeworsk Cultures in NE Germany. In Bebermeier, Hebenstreit, Kaiser, & Krause (Eds.), Landscape Archaeology (Vol. 3 of etopoi., pp. 399-403).

[11]   Ißelhorst, S. (2011). Sedimentuntersuchungen im Umfeld der archäologischen Grabung “Leimbach”, Nord Thüringen (57p). BSc Thesis, Department of Geosciences, Freie Universität Berlin.

[12]   Keller, L. (2010). Geophysikalische Prospektion in der Archäologie Siedlungsgeschichte des Südharzvorlandes. Master’s Thesis, FU Berlin.

[13]   Maier, G., Scholger, R., & Schön, J. (2006). The Influence of Soil Moisture Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 59, 162-175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.10.001

[14]   Meyer, M. (2005). Migration und Adaption—Ein differenziertes Modell zur Erklärung der latènezeitlichen Przeworsk-Funde in Deutschland. In Alt-Thüringen. Jahresschrift des Museums für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Thüringens/des Thüringischen Landesamtes für Archäologische Denkmalpflege bzw. Landesamtes für Archäologie mit Museum für Ur- und Früh-geschichte Thüringens, Band 38.

[15]   Oldfield, F. (1992). The Source of Fine-Grained Magnetite in Sediments. Holocene, 2, 180-182.

[16]   Ullrich, B. (2010). Erste Ergebnisse geophysikalischer Untersuchungen am Burgwall. In I. Beilke-Voigt, & F. Schopper (Eds.), Lossow-Alte Forschungen und neue Projekte, Materialien zur Archaälogie in Brandenburg, Bd. 4, Lossower Forschungen Bd. 1. Rahden/Westfalen.

[17]   Ullrich, B., Freibothe, R., Zoellner, H., Beilke-Voigt, I., Mehner, A., & Kaufmann, G. (2013). Multi-Geophysical Prospection in and around the Hillfort Lossow—A Bronze and Iron Age Central Site in Brandenburg, Germany. Arch. Prospection Submitted.

[18]   Ullrich, B., Kaufmann, G., Kniess, R., Zoellner, H., Meyer, M., & Keller, L. (2011). Geophysical Prospection in the Southern Harz Mountains, Germany: Settlement History and Landscape Archeology along the Interface of the Latène and Przeworsk Cultures. Arch. Prospection.

[19]   Unverzagt, W. (1930). Neue Ausgrabungen an vor- und frühgeschichtlichen Befestigungen in Nord- und Ostdeutschland. Ch. Der Burgwall von Lossow bei Frankfurt (Oder) (pp. 158-164).

 
 
Top