AHS  Vol.3 No.5 , December 2014
Rich and Poor
ABSTRACT
Starting with the medevial poor/rich-topics in the Acquinian tradition of the theological economy of charity, the article develops a rather unkown line in the history of economic thought from Thomas Acquinius to John Locke and Adam Smith. The rich/poor-distribution of the charity-principle transforms over John Lockes’ property/labor-relation in the new Smithian capital/labor-economics. It is a special European line from charity-distribution to labor/capital-accumulation.

Cite this paper
Priddat, B. (2014) Rich and Poor. Advances in Historical Studies, 3, 285-297. doi: 10.4236/ahs.2014.35023.
References
[1]   Alvey, J. (1988). Adams Smith’s Moral Justification for Free Enterprise—Economic Growth, S. 5ff. Asian Economics, No. 67, 5-28.

[2]   Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately Provided Public Goods in a Large Economy: The Limits of Altruism. Journal of Public Eco- nomics, 35, 57-73.

[3]   Chapman, E. (1939). The Relation between Ethics and Politics According to Aristotle and S. Thomas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 15, 176-203.

[4]   Hegel, G. F. W. (1819/20). Die Vorlesung von 1819/20 in einer Nachschrift, (ed.) D. Henrich, Frankfurt am Main (1983).

[5]   Hegel, G. F. W. (1821). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Frankfurt am Main (1976).

[6]   Hollander, S. (1973). The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

[7]   Hont, I. (1983). The “Rich Country—Poor Country” Debate in Scottish Classical Political Economy. In I. Hont, & P. Igna- tieff (Eds.), Wealth and Virtue. The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment (p. 271). Cambridge: University of Cambrige Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625077.012

[8]   Hont, I., & Ignatieff, P. (1983). Needs and Justice in the Wealth of Nations: An Introductory Essay (p. 1). In: see: Hont, 1983.

[9]   Langholm, O. (1984). The Aristotelian Analysis of Usury. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

[10]   Langholm, O. (1998). The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528491

[11]   Le Goff, J. (1988). Wucherzins und Höllenqualen. Stuttgart: Ökonomie und Religion im Mittelalter.

[12]   Locke, J. (1963). Some Considerations of the Consequences of Lowering the Interest and Raising the Value of Money. London: Printed for Awnsham and John Churchil.

[13]   Locke, J. (1982). Two Treatises of Government. London, Melbourne, Toronto: J. M. Dent.

[14]   Lowe, A. (1954). The Classical Theory of Economic Growth. Social Research, 21, 127.

[15]   Marperger, P. J. (1733). Wohlmeynende Gedancken über die Versorgung der Armen. Dresden: In Verlegung des Autoris.

[16]   Meikle, S. (1995). Aristotle’s Economic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[17]   Napp-Zinn, A. F. (1955). Johann Friedrich von Pfeiffer und die Kameralwissenschaften an der Universität Mainz. Wiesbaden: Steiner.

[18]   Priddat, B. P. (1986). übereinscholastisches Fundament der “Arbeitswert theorie”. bei John Locke: Industriaet diligentia. Diskussions schriftausdem Institutfür Politische Wissenschaft, Universität Hamburg, Nr. 15.

[19]   Priddat, B. P. (1988). Das Geld und die Vernunft. über John Lockes Versucheinernatur rechtlichbegründeten Ökonomie, Frankfurt am Main. Bern, New York, Paris: Lang.

[20]   Priddat, B. P. (1990a). Hegel alsÖkonom. Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt.

[21]   Priddat, B. P. (1990b). Ökonomie und Macht. In J. Gephardt, & T. der Sektion (Eds.), Politische Philosophie und Theoriegeschichte (pp. 112-138). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

[22]   Priddat, B. P. (2002). Theoriegeschichte der Ökonomie. München: Fink (UTB).

[23]   Reid, G. C. (1989). Classical Economic Growth. An Analysis in the Tradition of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[24]   Roscher, W. (1984). System der Armenpflege und Armenpolitik. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung.

[25]   Smith, A. (1762/63). Lectures of Jurisprudence. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

[26]   Smith, A. (1974). Der Wohlstand der Nationen. München: C. H. Beck Verlag.

[27]   Steuer, G. (1936). Studienüber die theoretischenGrundlagen der Zinslehrebei Thomas von Aquin. Stuttgart.

[28]   Todd Lowry, S. (1987). The Archaeology of Economic Ideas. The Classical Greek Tradition. Durham: Duke University Press.

[29]   Todd Lowry, S., & Gordon, B. (Eds.) (1998). Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden/New York/Köln: Brill Academic Publishers.

[30]   Vom Bruch, R. (1988). Wissenschaftliche, institutionelleoderpolitische Innovation? Kameralwissenschaft—Polizeiwissen- schaft—Wirtschaftswis senschaftim 18. Jahrhundertim Spiegel der Forschungsge schichte, p. 77 ff. In N. Waszek (Ed.), Die Institutionalisierung der Nationalökono mieandeutschen Universitäten (pp. 1937-1986). St. Katharinen: Zur Erinnerungan Klaus Hinrich Hennings.

[31]   Wittreck, F. (2002). Geld als Instrument der Gerechtigkeit. Die Geldrechtslehre des Hl. Thomas von Aquin in ihreminterkulturellen Kontext. Paderborn: Schöningh.

 
 
Top