AM  Vol.5 No.21 , December 2014
Causal Groupoid Symmetries and Big Data
ABSTRACT
The big problem of Big Data is the lack of a machine learning process that scales and finds meaningful features. Humans fill in for the insufficient automation, but the complexity of the tasks outpaces the human mind’s capacity to comprehend the data. Heuristic partition methods may help but still need humans to adjust the parameters. The same problems exist in many other disciplines and technologies that depend on Big Data or Machine Learning. Proposed here is a fractal groupoid-theoretical method that recursively partitions the problem and requires no heuristics or human intervention. It takes two steps. First, make explicit the fundamental causal nature of information in the physical world by encoding it as a causal set. Second, construct a functor F: C C′ on the category of causal sets that morphs causal set C into smaller causal set C′ by partitioning C into a set of invariant groupoid-theoretical blocks. Repeating the construction, there arises a sequence of progressively smaller causal sets C, C′, C″, The sequence defines a fractal hierarchy of features, with the features being invariant and hence endowed with a physical meaning, and the hierarchy being scale-free and hence ensuring proper scaling at all granularities. Fractals exist in nature nearly everywhere and at all physical scales, and invariants have long been known to be meaningful to us. The theory is also of interest for NP-hard combinatorial problems that can be expressed as a causal set, such as the Traveling Salesman problem. The recursive groupoid partition promoted by functor F works against their combinatorial complexity and appears to allow a low-order polynomial solution. A true test of this property requires special hardware, not yet available. However, as a proof of concept, a suite of sequential, non-heuristic algorithms were developed and used to solve a real-world 120-city problem of TSP on a personal computer. The results are reported.

Cite this paper
Pissanetzky, S. (2014) Causal Groupoid Symmetries and Big Data. Applied Mathematics, 5, 3489-3510. doi: 10.4236/am.2014.521327.
References
[1]   Pissanetzky, S. (2014) Causal Groupoid Symmetries. Applied Mathematics, 5, 628-641.
www.scirp.org/Journal/Home.aspx?IssueID=4511
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.54059


[2]   Kauffman, S. (2011) Answering Descartes: Beyond Turing. Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL 2011), Paris, 8-12 August 2011, 11-22.
http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/alife/0262297140chap4.pdf

[3]   Opdyke, W.F. (1992) Refactoring Object-Oriented Frameworks. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, Illinois.
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=169783

[4]   Pissanetzky, S. (2012) Reasoning with Computer Code: A New Mathematical Logic. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 3, 11-42.
www.degruyter.com/view/j/jagi.2012.3.issue-3/issue-files/jagi.2012.3.issue-3.xml

[5]   Cuntz, H., Mathy, A. and Hausser, M. (2012) A Scaling Law Derived from Optimal Dendritic Wiring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 11014-11018.
www.pnas.org/content/109/27/11014.abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200430109


[6]   Pissanetzky, S. and Lanzalaco, F. (2013) Black-Box Brain Experiments, Causal Mathematical Logic, and the Thermodynamics of Intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 4, 10-43.
www.degruyter.com/view/j/jagi.2013.4.issue-3/jagi-2013-0005/jagi-2013-0005.xml

[7]   Lanzalaco, F. and Pissanetzky, S. (2013) Causal Mathematical Logic as a Guiding Framework for the Prediction of “Intelligence Signals” in Brain Simulations. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 4, 44-88.
www.degruyter.com/view/j/jagi.2013.4.issue-3/jagi-2013-0006/jagi-2013-0006.xml

[8]   MacGregor, J.N. and Chu, Y. (2011) Human Performance on the Traveling Salesman and Related Problems: A Review. The Journal of Problem Solving, 3, 1-29.
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jps/vol3/iss2/2/
http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1090


[9]   Dorigo, M. and Gambardella, L.M. (1997) Ant Colonies for the Travelling Salesman Problem. Biosystems, 43, 73-81.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264797017085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2647(97)01708-5


[10]   Martin, C.F., Bhui, R., Bossaerts, P., Matsuzawa, T. and Camerer, C. (2014) Chimpanzee Choice Rates in Competitive Games Match Equilibrium Game Theory Predictions. Scientific Reports, 4, Article No. 5182.
www.nature.com/srep/2014/140605/srep05182/full/srep05182.html
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05182


[11]   Merolla, P.A., Arthur, J.V., Alvarez-Icaza, R., Cassidy, A.S., Sawada, J., Akopyan, F., et al. (2014) A Million Spiking-Neuron Integrated Circuit with a Scalable Communication Network and Interface. Science, 345, 668-673.
www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/668.abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1254642


[12]   Zhai, Y., Ong, Y.S. and Tsang, I.W. (2014) The Emerging “Big Dimensionality”. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 9, 14-26.
www.IEEE-CIS.org

[13]   Huijse, P., Estevez, P.A., Protopapas, P., Principe, J.C. and Zegers, P. (2014) Computational Intelligence Challenges and Applications on Large-Scale Astronomical Time Series Databases. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 9, 27-39.
www.IEEE-CIS.org

[14]   Zaremba, W., Szegedy, C., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I. and Fergus, R. (2014) Intriguing Properties of Neural Networks. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199.

[15]   Ng, A. (2014) RSS2014: 07/16 09:00-10:00 Invited Talk: Andrew Ng (Stanford University): Deep Learning.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W15K9PegQt0

[16]   Pissanetzky, S. (2011) Emergence and Self-Organization in Partially Ordered Sets. Complexity, 17, 19-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20389

[17]   Connes, A. (1994) Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, San Diego.
http://
www.alainconnes.org/docs/book94bigpdf.pdf

[18]   Hulpke, A. (2010) Notes on Computational Group Theory.
www.math.colostate.edu/~hulpke/CGT/cgtnotes.pdf

[19]   Fuster, J.M. (2005) Cortex and Mind. Oxford University Press, New York.
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780195300840.do

[20]   Fuster, J.M. (2009) Cortex and Memory: Emergence of a New Paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2047-2072.
http://cogsci.fmph.uniba.sk/~farkas/courses/Neurocomp/References/fuster.memory.jocn09.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21280


[21]   Berut, A., Arakelyan, A., Petrosyan, A., Ciliberto, S., Dillenschneider, R. and Lutz, E. (2012) Experimental Verification of Landauer’s Principle Linking Information and Thermodynamics. Nature, 483, 187-189.
www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10872


[22]   Pissanetzky, S. (2014) Tours for the Traveling Salesman Problem gr120.
www.scicontrols.com/Publications/TheTours.txt

[23]   Eguro, K., Hauck, S. and Sharma, A. (2005) Architecture Adaptive Range Limit Windowing for Simulated Annealing FPGA Placement. Microsoft Research, Design Automation Conference, San Francisco, 14-17 June 2005, 439-444.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=10020

[24]   Reinelt, G. (1995) Discrete and Combinatorial Optimization. tsplib.
http://comopt.ifi.uni-heidelberg.de/software/TSPLIB95/

[25]   Index of /groups/comopt/software/tsplib95/xmltsplib/instances. 1995.
www.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/TSPLIB95/XML-TSPLIB/instances/

[26]   Assembla Oocplex.
www.assembla.com/code/oocplex/subversion/nodes/3/
objectOrientedIntegerProgramming/sampleData/TSPLIB/gr120.opt.tour


[27]   Assembla Oocplex.
www.assembla.com/code/oocplex/subversion/nodes/3/objectOrientedIntegerProgramming/
sampleData/TSPLIB/gr120.tsp


[28]   The Traveling Salesman Problem.
www.math.uwaterloo.ca/tsp/

[29]   Wissner-Gross, A.D. and Freer, C.E. (2013) Causal Entropic Forces. Physical Review Letters, 110, Article ID: 168702.
www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.pdf

 
 
Top