JMP  Vol.5 No.17 , November 2014
Asymmetrical Genesis by Remanufacture of Antielectrons
Abstract: Problem: The asymmetrical genesis problem concerns why the universe should have an abundance of matter over antimatter. Purpose: This paper shows how the baryogenesis and leptogenesis asymmetries may both be resolved. Approach: Design methods were used to develop a conceptual mechanics for the remanufacturing processes that transform particles in the decay processes. This was based on the structures for the photon, electron, antielectron, proton and antineutrino as previously identified as logical necessities for the beta decay process, and represented as a non-local hidden-variable design with discrete fields. Findings: The solution is given in terms of a mechanics that defines the transformation of discrete field structures in particles. The genesis problem is shown to be solvable. The mechanics describes pair production of an electron and antielectron from two initial photons, and subsequent remanufacture of the antielectron into a proton. It is predicted that two antineutrinos would be emitted, which are testable and falsifiable. The theory identifies that the role of the antineutrinos is to remove the antimatter handed field structures. The original electron and proton may bond to form a simple hydrogen atom, or combine via electron capture to form a neutron and hence heavier nuclides. The subsequent preponderance of the matter pathways in the genesis production sequence is also addressed and is explained as domain warfare between the matter and antimatter species. Originality: The concept of remanufacture of antielectrons into protons, with emission of antineutrinos, is novel. Extensions of the theory explain the nuclides. Consequently the theory explains from pair production up to nuclear structure, which is also original.
Cite this paper: Pons, D. , Pons, A. and Pons, A. (2014) Asymmetrical Genesis by Remanufacture of Antielectrons. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 1980-1994. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.517193.

[1]   Riotto, A. (2011) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 335, Article ID: 012008.

[2]   Riotto, A. and Trodden, M. (1999) Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 49, 35-75.

[3]   Sakharov, A.D. (1967) Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 5, 24-27.

[4]   Dine, M. and Kusenko, A. (2003) Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1-30.

[5]   Dolgov, A. (2000) Matter-Antimatter Domains in the Universe. In: Frontiers in Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Elsevier, Netherlands.

[6]   Flanz, M., Paschos, E.A. and Wu, Y.L. (1993) Physics Letters B, 315, 379-385.

[7]   Lambiase, G., Mohanty, S. and Prasanna, A.R. (2013) International Journal of Modern Physics D, 22.

[8]   Alexander, S.H.S., Peskin, M.E. and Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M. (2006) Physical Review Letters, 96, Article ID: 081301.

[9]   Di Bari, P. (2012) Contemporary Physics, 53, 315-338.

[10]   Ho, C.M. (2011) Physics Letters B, 702, 398-401.

[11]   Gagnon, J.S. and Shaposhnikov, M. (2011) Physical Review D, 83, Article ID: 065021.

[12]   Fong, C.S., Nardi, E. and Riotto, A. (2012) Advances in High Energy Physics, 2012, Article ID: 158303.

[13]   Trodden, M. (1999) Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, 1463-1500.

[14]   Schmidt, M.G. (2011) Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 66, 249-253.

[15]   Gleiser, M. and Kolb, E.W. (1992) Physical Review Letters, 69, 1304-1307.

[16]   Klinkhamer, F.R. (1985) Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 29, 153-160.

[17]   Affleck, I. and Dine, M. (1985) Nuclear Physics B, 249, 361-380.

[18]   Buchmuller, W., Schmitz, K. and Vertongen, G. (2011) Nuclear Physics B, 851, 481-532.

[19]   Flanz, M., Paschos, E.A. and Sarkar, U. (1995) Physics Letters B, 345, 248-252.

[20]   Flanz, M., Paschos, E.A., Sarkar, U. and Weiss, J. (1996) Physics Letters B, 389, 693-699.

[21]   Bechtle, P., Sarrazin, B., Desch, K., Dreiner, H.K., Wienemann, P., Kramer, M., Robens, C. and O’Leary, B. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 011701, 5 p.

[22]   Dutta, B. and Kumar, J. (2011) Physics Letters B, 699, 364-367.

[23]   Haba, N. and Matsumoto, S. (2011) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 125, 1311-1316.

[24]   Kamada, K. and Yamaguchi, M. (2012) Physical Review D, 85, Article ID: 103530, 14 p.

[25]   Falkowski, A., Ruderman, J.T. and Volansky, T. (2011) Journal of High Energy Physics, 106.

[26]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D., Pons, A.M. and Pons, A.J. (2012) Physics Essays, 25, 132-140.

[27]   Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Physical Review, 47, 777.

[28]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2013) Applied Physics Research, 5, 145-174.

[29]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2013) Applied Physics Research, 5, 107-126.

[30]   Bell, J.S. (1964) Physics, 1, 195-200.

[31]   Leggett, A. (2003) Foundations of Physics, 33, 1469-1493.

[32]   Groblacher, S., Paterek, T., Kaltenbaek, R., Brukner, C., Zukowski, M., Aspelmeyer, M. and Zeilinger, A. (2007) Nature, 446, 871-875.

[33]   Laudisa, F. (2008) Foundations of Physics, 38, 1110-1132.

[34]   De Zela, F. (2008) Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41, Article ID: 505301.

[35]   de Broglie, L. (1925) Annales de Physique, 3.

[36]   Bohm, D. and Bub, J. (1966) Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 453-469.

[37]   Colbeck, R. and Renner, R. (2011) Nature Communications, 2, 5.

[38]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2014) Applied Physics Research, 6, 50-63.

[39]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2013) Applied Physics Research, 5, 23-47.

[40]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2014) Nuclear and Atomic Physics. viXra:1404.0051

[41]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2014) Physics Essays, 27, 26-35.

[42]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2014) Applied Physics Research, 6, 28-46.

[43]   Pons, D.J. and Pons, A.D. (2013) The Open Astronomy Journal, 6, 77-89.

[44]   FIPS (1993) Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0).

[45]   Pons, D.J., Pons, A.D. and Pons, A.J. (2013) Nuclear and Atomic Physics. viXra:1309.0010