JSS  Vol.2 No.11 , November 2014
Re-Scaling the Socio-Ecological Italian Conflicts: Marginality as Arena of Practices
ABSTRACT
The progressive raising of socio-ecological conflicts in Italy and the ordinary abuse of “emergency regimes” are progressively contributing to the fragmentation of public sphere. In Italy, “territorial public action” has long since abandoned indeed the ability to arrange the goods according to the model of the Nation State and Welfare State: recent cases like ILVA in Taranto, the earthquake in L’Aquila, and the improper management of the “environmental regimes” testifying the growing of regional conflicts around distribution of bads and production of risks. Abusing of emergency regimes is becoming both a structural constraints and a strategy for Italian policies, forcing institutional rationality to set up umbrella concept—sustainable development for instance—, a body of international Law in its own right, but de facto proceed intentionally avoiding implementation processes, broadening space-temporal misfit, favoring negative cascade effects even on democracy spaces. Moreover, the vertical shift of political authority produces an enforcement of functional differentiations reducing the policy efforts for a multisectorial and multistakeholder approach, the occasions of citizenship and inclusion of public policies, enhancing on the opposite “territorial conflict” in collective resistance. The aim is not to test the validity of the best technique to solve territorial conflicts. Rather it is to show the right path of a counter-apparatus and the role of polycentric perspectives and micro-territorial practices enhancing cognitive processes on territorial policies and breaking up the organizational constraints of “emergentism”. Using small case studies stands out the role of marginality as “creative approaches” that increase the governance (and government) effectiveness of public action, turning on the interstices that link different functional domains. Those capabilities are not usual to public action itself, belonging rather to community of practices. We name these “caring practices”, able to foster opportunity to de-structuring consolidated bodies of knowledge and set an unusual interaction processes together with the institutions. These practices do not re-balance the conflicts, but are able to overturn territorial conflicts in a new “codex” of learning opportunities, helping to set up renewed political spaces widening the intensity of citizenship and generating territorial innovation.

Cite this paper
Boldo, A. and Freschi, R. (2014) Re-Scaling the Socio-Ecological Italian Conflicts: Marginality as Arena of Practices. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 157-173. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.211022.
References
[1]   Crosta, P.L. (2010) Pratiche. Il territorio “è l’uso che se ne fa”. Franco Angeli, Milano.

[2]   Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space. Bleckwell, Oxford.

[3]   Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[4]   Young, O.R., Schroeder, H. and King, L.A., Eds. (2002) Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

[5]   Folke, C. (2006) Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological System Analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002

[6]   Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. (2005) Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

[7]   Galaz, V., Olsson, P., Hahn, T. and Svedin, U. (2002) The Problem of Fit among Biophysical Systems, Environmental and Resource Regimes, and Broader Governance Systems Insights and Emerging Challenges. In: Young, O.R., Schroeder, H. and King, L.A., Eds., Institutions and Environmental Change Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 147-186.

[8]   Cowles, M.G., Caporaso, J. and Risse, T. (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

[9]   Tedesco, C. (2005) Una politica europea per la città? L'implementazione di urban a Bari, Bristol, Londra e Roma. Franco Angeli, Milano.

[10]   Radaelli, C. (2003) The Europeanization of Public Policy. In: Featherstone, K. and Radaelli, C., Eds., The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 27-56.

[11]   IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. In: Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P.M., Eds., Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1535.

[12]   Grassi, T. (2013) Taranto. Oltre la notte. Progedit, Bari.

[13]   Legambiente (2014) Ilva, Legambiente presenta settanta osservazioni al Piano degli Esperti. http://www.ecodallecitta.it/download.php?s=notizie&e=pdf&f=3344

[14]   Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and Culture. University Press, Berkley.

[15]   Agamben, G. (2011) Altissima povertà. Regole monastiche e forme di vita. Neri Pozza Editore, Vicenza.

[16]   Luhmann, N. (1996) Sociologia del rischio. Bruno Mondadori Editori, Milano.

[17]   Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Holland, Boston.

[18]   Agamben, G. (2003) Stato d’eccezione. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

[19]   Watzlawick, P., Helmick Beavin, J. and Jackson, D. (1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. Norton, New York.

[20]   Foucault, M. (1976) La Volonté de savoir. Gallimard, Paris.

[21]   Deleuze, G. (1992) What Is a Dispositif? In: Armstrong, T.J., Ed., Michel Foucault Philosopher, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, 159-168.

[22]   Zoja, L. (2013) Utopie minimaliste. Un mondo più umano senza eroi. Chiarelettere, Milano.

[23]   Weick, K.E. (1995) Senso e significato dell’organizzazione. Raffaello Cortina, Milano.

[24]   Pressman, J. and Wildavsky, A. (1984) Implementation. University of California Press, Berkeley.

[25]   Nixon, R. (2011) Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

[26]   Gribaudi, G. (2008) Il ciclo vizioso dei rifiuti campani. Il Mulino n. 1, 17-33.

[27]   Zoja, L. (2009) La morte del prossimo. Einaudi, Torino.

[28]   Newman, S. (2011) Postanarchism and Space: Revolutionary Fantasies and Autonomous Zones. Planning Theory, 10, 344-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095211413753

[29]   Crosta, P.L. (2003) Reti trans locali. Le pratiche d’uso nel territorio come politiche e come politica. Foedus n. 7.

[30]   Crosta, P.L. (1998) Politiche. Quale conoscenza per l’azione territoriale. Franco Angeli, Milano.

[31]   Donolo, C. (1997) L’intelligenza delle istituzioni. Feltrinelli, Milano.

[32]   Mouffe, C. and Laclau, E. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso, London, New York.

[33]   Balibar, E. (2012) Cittadinanza. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.

[34]   Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. John Wiley, London.

[35]   Corte dei Conti (2008) La gestione dell’emergenza rifiuti effettuata dai Commissari straordinari del Governo. Relazione alla delibera n°6/2007/G.

[36]   Lanzara, G.F. (1993) Capacità negativa. Il Mulino, Bologna.

[37]   Teubner, G. (2012) Nuovi conflitti costituzionali. Norme fondamentali dei regimi transnazionali. Bruno Mondadori Editore.

[38]   Lindblom, C. (1990) Inquiry and Change. Yale University Press, New Haven, London.

[39]   Sini, C. (2011) Del viver bene. Jaca Book, Milano.

[40]   Elster, J. (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[41]   Bianchi, E. and Cacciari, M. (2011) I comandamenti. Ama il prossimo tuo. Il Mulino, Bologna.

[42]   Mortari, L. (2006) La pratica dell’aver cura. Mondadori, Milano.

[43]   Vitale, T. (2008) Politiche locali per i rom e i sinti, fra dinamiche di consenso e effettività eugenetica. In: Amendola, A., Bazzicalupo, L., Chicchi, F. and Tucci, A., Eds., Biopolitica, bioeconomia e processi di soggettivazione, Quodlibet, Macerata-Roma.

[44]   Putnam, R.D. (2002) Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195150899.001.0001

[45]   Jullien, F. (1997) Traité de l’efficacité. Grasset, Paris.

[46]   Bruni, L. (2010) L’ethos del mercato. Un’introduzione ai fondamenti antropologici e relazionali dell’economia. Bruno Mondadori, Milano.

[47]   Crosta, P.L. (2009) Casi di politiche urbane. La pratica delle pratiche d’uso del territorio. Franco Angeli, Milano.

[48]   Regonini, G. (2001) Capire le politiche pubbliche. Il Mulino, Bologna.

 
 
Top