Health  Vol.6 No.19 , November 2014
Contribution of Risk Perception for the Analysis of Non-Compliance to Work Procedures
ABSTRACT
One of the problems encountered in work security is non-compliance to work procedures by operators. The consequences of such human behavior are harmful to both the operators and the organization. These consequences are the result of a situational behavior of operators. This article focuses on the perception of work situations in a sample of Algerian workers in oil companies knowing that this perception determines, in large part, the decisions taken by the operators in terms of non-compliance with work procedures.

Cite this paper
Mouda, M. , Djebabra, M. and Chati, M. (2014) Contribution of Risk Perception for the Analysis of Non-Compliance to Work Procedures. Health, 6, 2705-2711. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.619309.
References
[1]   Stromme, M. (2013) Safety Training for the Oil and Gas Worker. J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.

[2]   Leplat, J. and Rasmussen, J. (1984) Analysis of Human Errors in Industrial Incidents and Accidents for Improvement of Work Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 16, 77-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(84)90033-2

[3]   INRS Report (2012) Safety of the Machines: Operating Modes and Neutralized Protections. INRS Editions ID 6129, France.

[4]   Rosenberg, N. and Frischtak, C. (1985) International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparisons. Praeger Editors, New York.

[5]   Dudognon, K. and Soulard, N. (2004) Design and Setting in Conformity of the Machines and Working Equipments. Document of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mediterranean University, Marseille.

[6]   Mouda, M. and Djebabra, M. (2013) Proposition of a Participative Approach for the Information Risk Control: Application to Industrial Procedures Improvement. AWER Procedia Information Technology & Computer Science, 3, 1004-1009.

[7]   De Brito, Y. (2006) Statut et non-respect des procédures écrites. Intellectica, 44, 63-85.

[8]   Hollnagel, E. (1993) The Phenotype of Erroneous Actions. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 1-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1051

[9]   Kohonen, T. (2001) Self-Organizing Maps. 3rd Edition, Springer, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2

[10]   Lievens, F., Peeters, H. and Schollaert, E. (2008) Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Recent Research. Personnel Review, 37, 426-441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480810877598

[11]   Analoui, F. (2007) Strategic Human Resource Management. Thomson, London.

[12]   Degenne, A. and Lemel, Y. (2006) Sociologie des comportements intentionnels. Economica Editions.

[13]   Wittorski, R. (1997) Analyse du travail et production des compétences collectives. L’Harmattan Ed.

[14]   Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y. and Said, T. (1987) Experimental Comparison of Individual Behavior under Risk and under Uncertainty for Gains and for Losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 39, 1-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90043-4

[15]   Beattie, J. and Loomes, G. (1997) The Impact of Incentives upon Risky Choice Experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 155-168.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007721327452

 
 
Top