AASoci  Vol.4 No.11 , November 2014
Participatory Teaching and Happiness in Developed Nations
Abstract: Average happiness differs considerably across nations. Much of this difference is in societal development, but average happiness differs also among developed nations. Much of that latter difference seems to be due to cultural factors and education is a main carrier of these. In that context we explored the effect of teaching styles on happiness. In a first study on the general public in 37 developed nations we found that people feel happier in the nations where participatory teaching prevailed. Much of this difference can be explained by the effect of teaching style on psychological autonomy. Participatory teaching fosters autonomy and autonomy adds to happiness. In a second study among high school pupils we found no correlation between average happiness and dominant teaching style in the nation, which fits the explanation that the effect of participatory teaching is in personality formation, with the consequences for happiness of which manifest in adulthood.
Cite this paper: Brulé, G. and Veenhoven, R. (2014) Participatory Teaching and Happiness in Developed Nations. Advances in Applied Sociology, 4, 235-245. doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2014.411028.

[1]   Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Shleifer, A. (2011). Teaching Practices and Social Capital. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5, 189-210.

[2]   Bay, C. (1970). The Structure of Freedom. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

[3]   Brulé, G., & Veenhoven, R. (2012). Why Are Latin Europeans Less Happy? The Impact of Hierarchy, Polyphonic Anthropology—Theoretical and Empirical Cross-Cultural Fieldwork. Rijeka: Intech Europe.

[4]   Brulé, G., & Veenhoven, R. (2014). Freedom and Happiness in Nations. Why the Finns Are Happier than the French. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory Research and Practice, 4, 17.

[5]   Currie, C., Barnekow Rasmussen, V., Currie, D., Gabhainn, S.N., Godeau, E., Morgan, A., Pickett, W., Richter, & Roberts, C. (2008). Inequalities in Young People’s Health: International Report from the HBSC 2005/2006 Survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 5.

[6]   Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.) (2000). Culture and Subjective Well-Being. Cambridge: MIT Press.

[7]   Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World Happiness Report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.

[8]   Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, Culture, Democracy, and Happiness. In: Culture and Subjective WellBeing (pp. 165-183).

[9]   Senik, C. (2011). The French Unhappiness Puzzle: The Cultural Dimension of Happiness. Working Paper n2011-34.

[10]   Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of Happiness. Dordrecht: Springer.

[11]   Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and Happiness: A Comparative Study in Forty-Four Nations in the Early 1990s. In: Culture and Subjective Well-Being (pp. 257-288).

[12]   Veenhoven, R. (2008). Freedom and Happiness: Comparison of 126 Nations in 2006. Legatum Prosperity Workshop, London, 21-22 June 2008.

[13]   Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater Happiness for a Greater Number: Is that Possible and Desirable? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 605-629.

[14]   Veenhoven, R. (2011). World Database of Happiness: Example of a Focused Findings Archive. Working Paper No. 169, German Data Forum RatSWD, February 2011.

[15]   Veenhoven, R. (2012a). Bibliography of Happiness. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

[16]   Veenhoven, R. (2012b). Happiness in Nations, World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

[17]   Veenhoven, R. (2012c). Findings on Happiness and Conditions on One’s Nation. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

[18]   Veenhoven, R. (2012d). Measures of Happiness, World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.