OJML  Vol.4 No.5 , December 2014
The Perceptual Span in Second Language Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study Using a Gaze-Contingent Moving Window Paradigm
The perceptual span, which is the visual area providing useful information to a reader during eye fixation, has been well investigated among native or first language (L1) readers, but not among second language (L2) readers. Our goal was to investigate the size of the perceptual span among Japanese university students who learn English as a foreign language (EFL) to investigate parafoveal processing during L2 reading. In an experiment using the gaze-contingent moving window paradigm, we compared perceptual span between Japanese EFL readers (N = 42) and native English L1 readers (N = 14). Our results showed that (1) the EFL readers had a smaller perceptual span than the L1 readers did, and (2) the facilitating effect of parafoveal information was greater for faster EFL readers than it was for slower EFL readers. These findings provide evidence that EFL readers can only utilize little parafoveal information during fixation when compared with L1 readers.

Cite this paper
Leung, C.Y., Sugiura, M., Abe, D. and Yoshikawa, L. (2014) The Perceptual Span in Second Language Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study Using a Gaze-Contingent Moving Window Paradigm. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 585-594. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2014.45051.

[1]   Apel, J. K., Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2012). Targeting Regressions: Do Readers Pay Attention to the Left? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1108-1113.

[2]   Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K. (2012). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Silent and Oral Reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 634-640.

[3]   Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[4]   Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.

[5]   Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes (R Package Version 0.999999-0).

[6]   Dubin, F., & Bycina, D. (1991). Academic Reading and the ESL/EFL Teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed., pp. 195-215). New York: Newbury House.

[7]   Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. S. (1982). Second Language Reading in Fluent Bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 329-341.

[8]   Haikio, T., Bertram, R., Hyona, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the Letter Identity Span in Reading: Evidence from the Eye Movement Moving Window Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 167-181.

[9]   Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of Foveal Processing Difficulty on the Perceptual Span in Reading: Implications for Attention and Eye Movement Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.

[10]   Hirai, A. (1999). The Relationship between Listening and Reading Rates of Japanese EFL Learners. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 367-384.

[11]   JACET Committee of Basic Words Revision (Ed.). (2003). JACET List of 8000 Basic Words: JACET 8000. Tokyo: JACET.

[12]   Jordan, T. J., Almabruk, A. A. A., Gadalla, E. M., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Abedipour, L., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Reading Direction and the Central Perceptual Span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 505-511.

[13]   McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The Span of the Effective Stimulus during a Fixation in Reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.

[14]   Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Parafoveal Magnification: Visual Acuity Does Not Modulate the Perceptual Span in Reading. Psychological Science, 20, 721-728.

[15]   Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A Short Course in Teaching Reading Skills. New York: Addison-Wesley.

[16]   Osaka, N., & Osaka, M. (2002). Individual Differences in Working Memory during Reading with and without Parafoveal Information: A Moving-Window Study. The American Journal of Psychology, 115, 501-513.

[17]   Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Malik, S., Abedipour, L., & Jordan, T. R. (2014). Reading Direction and the Central Perceptual Span in Urdu and English. PLoS ONE, 9, e88358.

[18]   Plummer, P., & Rayner, K. (2012). Effects of Parafoveal Word Length and Orthographic Features on Initial Fixation Landing Positions in Reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 950-963.

[19]   Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the Perceptual Span for Israeli Readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174-180.

[20]   R Development Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

[21]   Rayner, K. (1986). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Beginning and Skilled Readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211-236.

[22]   Rayner, K. (1998). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.

[23]   Rayner, K. (2009). Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.

[24]   Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Older and Younger Readers. Psychology & Aging, 24, 755-760.

[25]   Rayner, K., Liversedge, S. P., & White, S. J. (2006). Eye Movements When Reading Disappearing Text: The Importance of the Word to the Right of Fixation. Vision Research, 46, 310-323.

[26]   Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). The Psychology of Reading. New York: Psychology Press.

[27]   Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N. (2010). Eye Movements, the Perceptual Span, and Reading Speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 834-839.

[28]   Roberts, L., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2013). Using Eye-Tracking to Investigate Topics in L2 Acquisition and L2 Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 213-235.

[29]   Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal Processing in Reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 5-35.

[30]   Smith, F. (1988). Understanding Reading (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associate.

[31]   Taguchi, E., & Gorsuch, G. (2002). Transfer Effects of Repeated EFL Reading on Reading New Passages: A Preliminary Investigation. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 43-65.

[32]   Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2014). Lexical Quality and Eye Movements: Individual Differences in the Perceptual Span of Skilled Adult Readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 703-727.

[33]   Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S (4th ed.). New York: Springer.

[34]   Whitford, V., O’Driscoll, G. A., Pack, C., Joober, R., Malla, A., & Titone, D. (2013). Reading Impairments in Schizophrenia Relate to Individual Differences in Phonological Processing and Oculomotor Control: Evidence from a Gaze-Contingent Moving Window Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 57-75.

[35]   Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading Strategy Modulates Para-foveal-on-Foveal Effects in Sentence Reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 548-562.

[36]   Yamashita, J., & Ichikawa, S. (2010). Examining Reading Fluency in a Foreign Language: Effects of Text Segmentation on L2 Readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 263-283.