OJPM  Vol.4 No.11 , November 2014
Improving Diabetes Care by Data Feedback and Diabetes Templates
ABSTRACT
Importance: Health information technology has been used to improve diabetes care and outcomes. With the implementation of our diabetes registry, we discovered several flaws in the data. Objective: The aim of this paper is to demonstrate whether improving diabetes templates in electronic medical records associated with data feedback, improves process and quality outcomes for patients with diabetes. Methods: We redesigned our chronic diseases templates and clinical flow, built a diabetes registry and used the data for feedback to educate providers, staff and address inconsistencies. A total of 724 active diabetic patients were identified in October 2009 (pre-implementation) and 731 active diabetic patients were identified in June 2011 (post-implementation). Results: The results showed an improvement in the process outcomes of ordering hemoglobin A1C every 6 months and a microalbumin every 12 months (p-value < 0.05), but no change in the quality out-comes hemoglobin A1C less than 7, blood pressure less than 140/90 and LDL cholesterol less than 100 (p-value > 0.05). Discussion: Data feedback and lessons learned were instrumental to our practice change.

Cite this paper
Sow, C. , Omole, F. , Strayhorn, G. , Mack, D. , Davis, W. and Omole, O. (2014) Improving Diabetes Care by Data Feedback and Diabetes Templates. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4, 829-833. doi: 10.4236/ojpm.2014.411093.
References
[1]   IOM (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027&page=R1#

[2]   (2014) Improving Chronic Illness Care: The Chronic Care Model.
http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/change/index.html

[3]   Wagner, E.H. (1998) Chronic Disease Management: What Will It Take to Improve Care for Chronic Illness? Effective Clinical Practice, 1, 2-4.

[4]   Hunt, J.S., Siemienczuk, J., Gillanders, W., et al. (2009) The Impact of a Physician-Directed Health Information Technology System on Diabetes Outcomes in Primary Care: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study. Informatics in Primary Care, 17, 165-174.

[5]   O’Connor, P.J., Crain, A.L., Rush, W.A., Sperl-Hillen, J.M., Gutenkauf, J.J. and Duncan, J.E. (2005) Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care. Annals of Family Medicine, 3, 300-306.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.327

[6]   NCQA (2014) Diabetes Recognition Program 2009. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/139/default.aspx

[7]   Kiefe, C.I., Allison, J.J., Williams, O.D., Person, S.D., Weaver, M.T. and Weissman, N.W. (2001) Improving Quality Improvement Using Achievable Benchmarks for Physician Feedback. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2871-2879.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.22.2871

[8]   Berryman, S.H., Sick, B.T., Wang, Q., Swan, P.J. and Weber-Main, A.M. (2013) Use of Automated Reminder Letters to Improve Diabetes Management in Primary Care: Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Initiative. Quality in Primary Care, 21, 359-368.

[9]   Bradley, E.H., Holmboe, E.S., Mattera, J.A., Roumanis, S.A., Radford, M.J. and Krumholz, H.M. (2004) Data Feedback Efforts in Quality Improvement: Lessons Learned from US Hospitals. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13, 26-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.1.26

 
 
Top