[1] Gibbard, A. (1973) Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica, 41, 587-601.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914083
[2] Satterthwaite, M. (1975) Strategy-Proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 187-217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2
[3] Ludwin, W.G. (1978) Strategic Voting and the Borda Method. Public Choice, 33, 85-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00123946
[4] Kube, S. and Puppe, C. (2009) (When and How) Do Voters Try to Manipulate?: Experimental Evidence from Borda Elections. Public Choice, 139, 39-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9376-9
[5] Forsythe, R., Rietz, T., Myerson, R. and Weber, R. (1996) An Experimental Study of Voting Rules and Polls in Three-Candidate Elections. International Journal of Game Theory, 25, 355-383.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02425262
[6] Bassi, A. (2014) Voting Systems and Strategic Manipulation: An Experimental Study. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Online First. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0951629813514300
[7] Duffy, J. and Tavits, M. (2008) Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 603-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00332.x
[8] Selten, R. (1973) A Simple Model of Imperfect Competition, Where 4 Are Few and 6 Are Many. International Journal of Game Theory, 2, 141-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01737566
[9] Huck, S., Normann, H.T. and Oechssler, J. (2004) Two Are Few and Four Are Many: Number Effects in Experimental Oligopolies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53, 435-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2002.10.002
[10] Fischbacher, U. (1999) z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
[11] Lehtinen, A. (2007) The Borda Rule Is Intended Also for Dishonest Men. Public Choice, 133, 73-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9178-5