OJOG  Vol.4 No.14 , October 2014
Incongruence between the Preferred Mode of Delivery and Risk of Childbirth Complications among Antepartum Women in Mulago Hospital, Uganda
Objective: Women’s preferences for the mode of delivery provide clues on their knowledge and perceptions of anticipated risk of childbirth complications. The objective was toinvestigate incongruence between preferred mode of delivery and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods: Through a cross-sectional study, data were collected from 327 women admitted to Mulago hospital. Data included socio-demographic characteristics, past medical, gynaecological and obstetric history, pregnancy complications, knowledge of pregnancy complications and preferred mode of delivery. The preferred mode of delivery and knowledge of related risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared. Results: The mean age of participants was 24.7 years (±5.9), ranging 14 - 43 years, of whom 41.4% were nulliparous. The preferred mode of delivery was vaginal (84.1%). Incongruence (preference for a mode of delivery that did not correspond to expected or anticipated risks) occurred in 88 (26.9%) of the women, and was associated with having secondary school or higher level of education (OR 2.49, CI 1.52 - 4.08) and history of previous vaginal delivery (OR 3.82, CI 1.94 - 7.49). Conclusion: One in four women had incongruence between preferred mode of delivery and risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, which called for urgent interventions to improve decision-making about intrapartum care.

Cite this paper
Kaye, D. , Nakimuli, A. , Kakaire, O. , Osinde, M. , Kakande, N. and Mbalinda, S. (2014) Incongruence between the Preferred Mode of Delivery and Risk of Childbirth Complications among Antepartum Women in Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 889-898. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2014.414125.
[1]   World Health Organization (1997) Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/

[2]   American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007) Caesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 1501-1504.

[3]   Schenker, J. and Cain, J. (1999) FIGO Committee Report: FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 64, 317-322.

[4]   Schindl, M., Birner, P., Reingrabner, M., Joura, E., Husslein, P. and Langer, M. (2003) Elective Caesarean Section vs. Spontaneous Delivery: A Comparative Study of Birth Experience. Acta Obstetriciaet Gynecologia Scandinavica, 82, 834-840.

[5]   Villar, J., Carroli, G., Zavaleta, N., Donner, A., Wojdyla, D. and Faundes, A. (2007) Maternal and Neonatal Individual Risks and Benefits Associated with Caesarean Delivery: Multicentre Prospective Study. British Medical Journal, 335, 1025-1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55

[6]   Zanardo, V., Simbi, A., Franzoi, M., Solda, G., Salvadori, A. and Trevisanuto, D. (2004) Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Risk and Mode of Delivery at Term: Influence of Timing of Elective Caesarean Delivery. Acta Paediatricia, 93, 643-647.

[7]   Weaver, J., Statham, H. and Richards, M. (2007) Are There “Unnecessary” Caesarean Sections? Perceptions of Women and Obstetricians about Caesarean Sections for Nonclinical Indications. Birth, 34, 32-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00144.x

[8]   Habiba, M., Kaminski, M., Da Frè, M., Marsal, K., Bleker, O., Librero, J., et al. (2006) Caesarean Section on Request: A Comparison of Obstetricians’ Attitudes in Eight European Countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113, 647-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00933.x

[9]   Litorp, H., Kidanto, H., Nystrom, L., Darj, E. and Essén, B. (2013) Increasing Caesarean Section Rates among Low-Risk Groups: A Panel Study Classifying Deliveries According to Robson at a University Hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 13, 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-107

[10]   Druzin, M.L. and El-Sayed, Y.Y. (2006) Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Wise Use of Finite Resources? A View from the Trenches. Seminars in Perinatology, 30, 305-358.

[11]   Hildingsson, I., R?destad, I., Rubertsson, C., Rubertsson, C. and Waldenstr?m, U. (2002) Few Women Wish to Be Delivered by Caesarean Section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 109, 618-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01393.x

[12]   Angeja, A., Washington, A., Vargas, J., Gomez, R., Rojas, I. and Caughey, A. (2006) Chilean Women’s Preferences Regarding Mode of Delivery: Which Do They Prefer and Why? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113, 1253-1258.

[13]   Aziken, M., Omo-Aghoja, L. and Okonofua, F. (2007) Perception and Attitude of Pregnant Women towards Caesarean Section in Urban Nigeria. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologia Scandinavica, 86, 42-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016340600994950

[14]   Gamble, J. and Creedy, D. (2001) Women’s Preference for a Caesarean Section: Incidence and Associated Factors. Birth, 28, 101-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536X.2001.00101.x

[15]   Pang, M., Leung, T., Lau, T.K. and Chung, T.K.H. (2008) Impact of First Childbirth on Changes in Women’s Preference for Mode of Delivery: Follow-Up of a Longitudinal Observational Study. Birth, 35, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x

[16]   Waldenstrom, U., Hildingsson, I., and Ryding, E. (2006) Antenatal Fear of Childbirth and Its Association with Subsequent Caesarean section and Experience of Childbirth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113, 638-646.

[17]   Chigbu, C. and Iloabachie, G. (2007) The Burden of Caesarean Section Refusal in a Developing Country Setting. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114, 1261-1265.

[18]   Lavender, T., Hofmeyr, G.J., Neilson, J.P., Kingdon, C. and Gyte, G.M.L. (2007) Caesarean Section for Non-Medical Reasons at Term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

[19]   Wax, J.R., Cartin, A., Michael, G. and Blackstone, J. (2004) Patient Choice Cesarean: An Evidence-Based Review. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 59, 601-616.

[20]   D’Souza, R. and Arulkumaran, S. (2013) To “C” or not to “C”? Caesarean Delivery upon Maternal Request: A Review of Facts, Figures and Guidelines. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 41, 5-15.

[21]   Allen, V.M., O’Connell, C.M., Liston, R.M. and Baskett, T.F. (2003) Maternal Morbidity Associated with Cesarean Delivery without Labor Compared with Spontaneous Onset of Labor at Term. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102, 477-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00570-2

[22]   Prior, E., Santhakumaran, S., Gale, C., Philipps, L.H., Modi, N. and Hyde, M.J. (2012) Breastfeeding after Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of World Literature. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95, 1113-1135. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.030254

[23]   Silver, R.M., Landon, M.B., Rouse, D.J., Leveno, K.J., Spong, C.Y., Thom, E.A., et al. (2006) Maternal Morbidity Associated with Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 107, 1226-1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84

[24]   Walker, S.P., McCarthy, E.A., Ugoni, A., Lee, A., Lim, S. and Permezel, M. (2007) Cesarean Delivery or Vaginal Birth: A Survey of Patient and Clinician Thresholds. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109, 67-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000250902.67911.ce

[25]   Smith, G.C., Pell, J.P., Cameron, A.D. and Dobbie, R. (2002) Risk of Perinatal Death Associated with Labor after Previous Caesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2684-2690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.20.2684

[26]   Gibbons, J.M.B., Lauer, J.A., Betrán, A.P. and Althabe, F. (2010) The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. Background Paper 30. World Health Organization, Geneva.

[27]   Mancuso, A., De Vivo, A., Fanara, G., Settineri, S., Triolo, O. and Giacobbe, A. (2006) Women’s Preference on Mode of Delivery in Southern Italy. Acta Obstetriciaet Gynecologia Scandinavica, 85, 694-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016340600645255

[28]   Dweik, D., Girasek, E., Toreki, A., Mészáros, G. and Pál, A. (2014) Women’s Antenatal Preferences for Delivery Route in a Setting with High Cesarean Section Rates and a Medically Dominated Maternity System. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 93, 408-415.

[29]   Nerum, H., Halvorsen, L., Sorlie, T. and Oian, P. (2006) Maternal Request for Cesarean Section Due to Fear of Birth: Can It Be Changed through Crisis-Oriented Counseling? Birth, 33, 221-228.

[30]   Little, M.O., Lyerly, A.D., Mitchell, L.M., Armstrong, E.M., Harris, L.H., Kukla, R. and Kuppermann, M. (2008) Mode of Delivery: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Patient Preferences. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 112, 913-918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181888fd8

[31]   Thompson, R. and Miller, Y.D. (2014) Birth Control: To What Extent Do Women Report Being Informed and Involved in Decisions about Pregnancy and Birth Procedures? BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14, 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-62

[32]   Moffat, M.A., Bell, J.S., Porter, M.A., Lawton, S., Hundley, V., Danielian, P., et al. (2007) Decision Making about Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women Who Have Previously Had a Caesarean Section: A Qualitative Study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114, 86-93.

[33]   Deng, W., Klemetti, R., Long, Q., Wu, Z., Duan, C., Zhang, W.H., et al. (2014) Cesarean Section in Shanghai: Women’s or Healthcare Provider’s Preferences? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14, 285.