IJMPCERO  Vol.3 No.4 , November 2014
Dose Validation of Physical Wedged Asymmetric Fields in Artiste Linear Accelerator
Abstract: Aim: The purpose of this study was to make a comparison between measured and calculated physical wedge dose distributions using the superposition algorithm. Settings and Design: The accurate determination of absorbed dose is important radiotherapy because of the relatively steep sigmoidal dose response curves for both tumor control and normal-tissue damage. Materials and Methods: High-energy photons (6 and 10 MV) from Artiste Treatment System Linear Accelerator Machine, available at Alexandria Ayadi Al-Mostakbal Oncology Center, were used. Results and Discussion: The results showed that the difference between measured and calculated wedged isodose curves depends on field size, beam energy, and the angle of the used wedge. Conclusion: The results showed that the presence of a wedge alters the primary and scattered components generated by a linear accelerator and causes beam hardening in 6 and 10 MV. The beam hardening increased as the wedge angle increased.
Cite this paper: Dawod, T. , Abdelrazek, E. , Elnaggar, M. and Omar, R. (2014) Dose Validation of Physical Wedged Asymmetric Fields in Artiste Linear Accelerator. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 3, 201-209. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2014.34026.

[1]   de Oliveira, L.N., Carmen, S.G.C., Fernanda, C. and de Adelaide, A. and de Almeida, C.E. (2009) 6 MV Wedge Photon Beam Profiles with the Fricke Xylenol Gel Dosimeter. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 39, 615-618.

[2]   Storchi, P. and Woudstra, E. (1996) Calculation of the Absorbed Dose Distribution Due to Irregularly Shaped Photon Beams Using Pencil Beam Kernels Derived from Basic Beam Data. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41, 637-656.

[3]   Anjum, M.N., Qadir, A. and Afzal, M. (2008) Dosimetric Evaluation of a Treatment Planning System Using Pencil Beam Convolution Algorithm for Enhanced Dynamic Wedges with Symmetric and Asymmetric Fields. International Journal of Radiation Research, 5, 169-174.

[4]   Dai, J., Zhu, Y. and Wu, X. (2001) Verification of the super omni wedge concept. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 46, 2447-2455.

[5]   Huntzinger, C.J. (1992) Dynamic Wedge: A Physicist’s Perspective. Varian Dynamic Wedge Users’ Meeting Proceedings, Calagary, August 1992, 24.

[6]   Strunga, E. (1995) Physical Parameters for Wedge Filter Used in Radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 37, 59-59.

[7]   Dumitru, M., Rebegea, L., Praisler, M., Strunga, E. and Dumitrache, M. (2013) Issues in Radiotherapy Practice Due the Presence of Wedge Filters. Romanian Reports in Physics, 65, 456-467.

[8]   Khan, F.M. (1994) The Physics of Radiation Therapy. 2nd Edition, Williams and Wilkins, London.

[9]   Leavitt, D.D., Martin, M., Moeller, J.H. and Lee, W.L. (1990) Dynamic Wedge Field Techniques through Computer-Controlled Collimator Motion and Dose Delivery. Medical Physics, 17, 87-91.

[10]   Klein, E.E., Low, D.A., Meigooni, A.S. and Purdy, J.A. (1995) Dosimetry and Clinical Implementation of Dynamic Wedge. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 31, 583-592.

[11]   Leavitt, D.D. and Klein, E. (1997) Dosimetry Measurement Tools for Commissioning Enhanced Dynamic Wedge. Medical Dosimetry, 22, 171-176.

[12]   Gibbons, J.P. (1998) Calculation of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors for Symmetric and Asymmetric Photon Fields. Medical Physics, 25, 1411-1418.

[13]   Prabhakar, R., Julka, P.K. and Rath, G.K. (2008) Can Field in Field Technique Replace Wedge Filter in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: A Comparative Analysis in Various Treatment Sites. Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 31, 317-324.

[14]   Das, I.J., Cheng, C.-W., Watts, R.J., Ahnesjö, A., Gibbons, J., Li, X.A., et al. (2008) Accelerator Beam Data Commissioning Equipment and Procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Medical Physics, 35, 4186.

[15]   Keall, P., Zavgorodni, S., Schmidt, L. and Haskard, D. (1997) Improving Wedged Field Dose Distributions. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 42, 2183-2192.

[16]   Myler, U. and Szabo, J.J. (2002) Dose Calculation along the Nonwedged Direction. Medical Physics, 29, 746-754.

[17]   Breitman, K., Rathee, S., Newcomb, C., Murray, B., Robinson, D., Field, C., et al. (2007) Experimental Validation of the Eclipse AAA Algorithm. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 8, 76-92.

[18]   Miften, M.M., Beavis, A.W. and Marks, L.B. (2002) The Influence of the Dose Calculation Model on Treatment Plan Evaluation in Conformal Therapy: A Three Case Study. Medical Dosimetry, 27, 51-57.

[19]   Parker, W. and Patrocinio, H. (2005) Clinical Treatment Planning in External Photon Beam Radiotherapy. In: Podgorsak, E.B., Ed., Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 219.

[20]   Mayles, P., Nahum, A. and Rosenwald, J.C. (2007) Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics: Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, London.

[21]   Knöös, T. and Wittgren, L. (1991) Which Depth Dose Data Should Be Used for Dose Planning When Wedge Filters Are Used to Modify the Photon Beam? Physics in Medicine and Biology, 36, 255-266.

[22]   Podgorsak, M.B., Kubsad, S.S. and Paliwal, B.R. (1993) Dosimetry of Large Wedged High Energy Photon Beams. Medical Physics, 20, 369-372.

[23]   Van Dyk, J., Barnett, R., Cygler, J. and Shragge, P. (1993) Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Treatment Planning Computers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 26, 261-273.

[24]   Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt, M., Kutcher, G., Starkschall, G., Stern, R., et al. (1998) American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality Assurance for Clinical Radiotherapy Treatment Planning. Medical Physics, 25, 1773.

[25]   Venselaar, J. and Welleweerd, H. (2001) Verification of Dose Calculations with a Treatment Planning System for Open and Wedged Fields of a Cobalt-60 Unit with a New Asymmetric Collimator. Medical Dosimetry, 26, 309-314.

[26]   Caprile, P.F., Venencia, C.D. and Besa, P. (2007) Comparison between Measured and Calculated Dynamic Wedge Dose Distributions Using the Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm and Pencil Beam Convolution. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 8, 47-54.

[27]   Maqbool, M., Muhammad, W., Shahid, M., Ahmad, M. and Matiullah, M. (2010) Accuracy Checks of Physical Beam Modifier Factors Algorithm Used in Computerized Treatment Planning System for a 15 MV Photon Beam. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 14, 214-220.

[28]   Nath, R., et al. (1994) AAPM Code of Practice for Radiotherapy Accelerators. AAPM Report No. 47, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury.

[29]   Pasquino, M., Casanova Borca, V., Tofani, S. and Ozzello, F. (2009) Verification of Varian Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Implementation in Masterplan Treatment Planning System. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2, 2867.

[30]   Momennezhad, M., Bahreyni Toosi, M.T., Sadeghi, R., Gholamhoseinian, H. and Nasseri, Sh. (2010) A Monte Carlo Simulation and Dosimetric Verification of Physical Wedges Used in Radiation Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Research, 7, 223-227.