CE  Vol.5 No.16 , September 2014
Primary and Lower Secondary School Teachers: Teachers’ Attitudes and Perceptions about Traditional Teaching Methodologies and Modern Teaching Methodologies according to RWCT
ABSTRACT
Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking (RWCT) is a modern teaching philosophy which is based on the philosophy of constructivism, according to which the students actively participate in building up knowledge through involvement in research activities (Kosova Education Center, 2011). Aim of the investigation: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between attitudes and perceptions of the teachers of primary and lower secondary schools in regard to a traditional and modern teaching methodology such as RWCT. Method: This is a quantitative and a qualitative study. Questionnaires were utilized for the quantitative data collection, whereas a focus group discussion was conducted for qualitative data collection. The study was implemented in a sample of 473 9th grade school teachers in Kosovo. The sample was selected using a random sample selection with inclusion of urban and rural areas proportionally. Results: The data suggest there is a significant difference in attitudes and perception of primary and lower secondary school teachers, in all three measured scales: attitudes about traditional methodologies (t = 2.358, p = .019); attitudes about modern methodologies as RWCT (t = 3.077, p = .002) as well as teachers’ perception about the teaching process (t = 2.981, p = .003). Differences in primary and lower secondary school teachers’ attitudes and perception were also reflected in the qualitative data findings. Conclusion: Based on the quantitative and qualitative data, it can be noted that there is a significant difference in primary and lower secondary school teachers’ attitudes and perceptions towards teaching methodologies.

Cite this paper
Karanezi, X. (2014) Primary and Lower Secondary School Teachers: Teachers’ Attitudes and Perceptions about Traditional Teaching Methodologies and Modern Teaching Methodologies according to RWCT. Creative Education, 5, 1567-1575. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.516173.
References
[1]   American Institute for Research (2001). The 2000-2001 Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Project Impact and Institutionalization Study. New York: OSI.

[2]   Barnyak, N. C., & Paquette, K. (2010). An Investigation of Elementary Preservice Teachers Reading Instruction Beliefs. Reading Improvement. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.

[3]   Covac, M., & Cretu, N. (2010). Critical Thinking Program Review. OSI.

[4]   Crawford, A., Saul, W., Mathews, S., & Makinster, J. (2005). Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classrooms. The International Debate Education Association.

[5]   Educational Broadcasting Corporation (2004). Constructivism as a Paradigm for Teaching and Learning (30th ed.). Online.

[6]   Kennedy, M., Fisher, M. B., & Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical Thinking: Literature Review and Needed Research. In L. Idol, & B. P. Jones (Eds.). Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Reform, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[7]   Kosova Education Center (2011). Working Report 2010. Prishtinë.

[8]   Kosovo Pedagogical Institute (2008). The Impact of Teaching Training in Education Process. Prishtinë.

[9]   Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[10]   Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[11]   Lau, J., & Chan, J. (2004-2014). What Is Critical Thinking?

[12]   Leach, J., & Moon, B. (1999). Learners and Pedagogy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

[13]   Munby, H. (1982). The Place of Teachers’ Beliefs in Research on Teacher Thinking and Decision Making, and an Alternative Methodology. The Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, 11-13 February 1982, 201-205.

[14]   Pupovci, D., & Taylor, A. (2003). Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking. Final Evaluation Report. Prishtinë: Kosova Education Centre.

[15]   Rado, P. (2013). The Evaluation of the Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Program in Kosovo. Final Evaluation Report. Prishtinë: Kosova Education Center.

[16]   Richards, J. C. (2008). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[17]   Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.

[18]   Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching. Oxford: MacMillan.

[19]   Steele, J. L. (2001). The Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Project: A Framework for School Change. In D. Klooster, J. Steele, & P. Bloem (Eds.), Ideas without Boundaries: International Educational Reform through Reading, Writing and Critical Thinking (pp. 2-21). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[20]   Temple, C., Crawford, A., Saul, W., Mathews, S., & Makinster, J. (2006). Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classroom. Trainers Guide. New York: The International Debate Education Association.

[21]   Wile, M. J., & Ulqini, L. (2003). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Eastern Europe. Paper Presented at the World Bank’s International Workshop, Curricula, Textbooks, and Pedagogical Practices and the Promotion of Peace and Respect for Diversity, Washington, D.C., 24-25 March 2003.

 
 
Top