JBBS  Vol.4 No.9 , September 2014
Invariance of Functional Characteristics to Task Difference at Low-Level and High-Level Areas in the Ventral Visual Pathway
Abstract: Tasks with stimuli are often used for the examination of stimulus-related functional characteristics of brain areas. However, the task can affect the response to a stimulus. Repetition suppression is a phenomenon that can be used to probe neuronal properties using macroscale functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The use of repetition suppression as an investigative tool to assess functional characteristics warrants the investigation of the invariance of repetition suppression to a given task. In this study, we examined repetition suppression using images of faces during different tasks. We found that the task difference did not change the response patterns related to repetition suppression in high-level areas and the primary visual area while it changed amplitudes of fMRI response to the visual stimuli. The result suggests that the repetition-suppression phenomenon is robust compared with the amplitude of fMRI response, and functional characteristics can be examined using the repetition-suppression phenomenon even under the condition that fMRI response is varied by task difference.
Cite this paper: Sung, Y. , Choi, U. and Ogawa, S. (2014) Invariance of Functional Characteristics to Task Difference at Low-Level and High-Level Areas in the Ventral Visual Pathway. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 4, 402-411. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2014.49039.

[1]   Ogawa, S., Lee, T.-M., Stepnoski, R., Chen, W., Zhu, X.-H. and Ugurbil, K. (2000) An Approach to Probe Some Neural Systems Interaction by Functional MRI at Neural Time Scale down to Milliseconds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 11026-11031.

[2]   Waldeck, R., Pereda, A. and Faber, D.S. (2000) Properties and Plasticity of Paired-Pulse Depression at a Central Synapse. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 5321-5320.

[3]   Henson, R.N. and Rugg, M.D. (2003) Neural Response Suppression, Haemodynamic Repetition Effects, and Behavioral Priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263-270.

[4]   Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. and Martin, A. (2006) Repetition and the Brain: Neural Models of Stimulus-Specific Effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23.

[5]   Kravitz, D.J., Vinson L.D. and Baker C.I. (2008) How Position Dependent Is Visual Object Recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 114-122.

[6]   Harel, A., Kravitz D.J. and Baker C.I. (2014) Task Context Impacts Visual Object Processing Differentially across the Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in press.

[7]   Kanwisher N. and Wojciulik E. (2000) Visual Attention: Insights from Brain Imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 91-100.

[8]   O’Conner, D.H., Fukui, M.M., Pinsk, M.A. and Kastner, S. (2002) Attention Modulates Responses in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1203-1209.

[9]   O’Craven, K.M., Downing P.E. and Kanwisher N. (1999) fMRI Evidences for Objects as the Units of Attentional Selection. Nature, 401, 584-587.

[10]   Reddy, L., Moradi, F. and Koch C. (2007) Top-Down Biases Win against Focal Attention in the Fusiform Face Area. Neuroimage, 28, 730-739.

[11]   Sprague, T.C. and Serences, J.T. (2013) Attention Modulates Spatial Priority Maps in the Human Occipital, Parietal and Frontal Cortices. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1879-1887.

[12]   Yantis, S. (2008) The Neural Basis of Selective Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 86-90.

[13]   Davidesco, I., Harel, M., Ramot, M., Kramer, U., Kipervasser, S., et al. (2013) Spatial and Object-Based Attention Modulates Broadband High-Frequency Responses across the Human Visual Cortical Hierarchy. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 1228-1240.

[14]   Ogawa, S., Sung, Y., Kamba, M. and Nagaoka, T. (2003) Probing the Temporal Dynamics of the Functional System Interaction in the Brain by Functional MRI. Advances in Neurological Sciences, 47, 902-908.

[15]   Bressler, D., Fortenbaugh, F., Robertson, L. and Silver, M. (2013) Visual Spatial Attention Enhances the Amplitude of Positive and Negative fMRI Responses to Visual Stimulation in an Eccentricity-Dependent Manner. Vision Research, 85, 104-112.

[16]   Bressler, D. and Silver, M. (2010) Spatial Attention Improves Reliability of fMRI Retinotopic Mapping Signals in Occipital and Parietal Cortex. Neuroimage, 53, 526-533.

[17]   Levy, I., Hasson, U., Avidan, G., Hendler, T. and Malach, R. (2001) Center-Periphery Organization of Human Object Areas. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 533-539.

[18]   Hemond, C., Kanwisher, N. and Op de Beeck, H. (2007) A Preference for Contralateral Stimuli in Human Object-and Face-Selective Cortex. PLoS ONE, 2, e574.

[19]   Pernet, C., Schyns, P. and Demonet, J.-F. (2007) Specific, Selective or Preferential: Comments on Category Specificity in Neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 35, 991-997.

[20]   Sowden, P.T. and Schynes, P.G. (2006) Channel Surfing in the Visual Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 538-545.

[21]   Haynes, J.D. and Rees, G. (2006) Decoding Mental States from Brain Activity in Humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 523-534.

[22]   Mourao-Miranda, J., Bokde, A.L.W. and Born, C. (2005) Classifying Brain States and Determining the Discriminating Activation Patterns: Support Vector Machine on Functional MRI Data. Neuroimage, 28, 980-995.

[23]   Norman, K.A., Polyn, S.M., Detre, G.J. and Haxby, J.V. (2006) Beyond Mind-Reading: Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 424-430.

[24]   Johnson, J.D., McDuff, S.G.R., Rugg, M.D. and Norman, K.A. (2009) Recollection, Familiarity and Cortical Reinstatement: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis. Neuron, 63, 697-708.

[25]   Schyns, P.G., Gosselin, F. and Smith, M.L. (2008) Information Processing Algorithms in the Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 20-26.

[26]   Eger, E., Henson, R.N., Driver, J. and Doaln, R.J. (2004) BOLD Repetition Decreases in Object-Responsive Ventral Visual Areas Depend on Spatial Attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1241-1247.

[27]   Grill-Spector, K. and Malach, R. (2001) fMR-Adaptation: A Tool for Studying the Functional Properties of Human Cortical Neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 293-321.

[28]   Henson, R.N., Shallice, T., Gorno-Tempini, M.L. and Dolan, R.J. (2002) Face Repetition Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests as Measured by fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 178-186.

[29]   James, T.W. and Gauthier, I. (2007) Repetition-Induced Changes in BOLD Response Reflect Accumulation of Neural Activity. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 37-46.

[30]   Schweinberger, S.R., Huddy, V. and Burton, A.M. (2004) N250r: A Face-Selective Brain Response to Stimulus Repetitions. Neuroreport, 15, 1501-1505.

[31]   Winston, J.S., Henson, R.N., Fine-Goulden, M.R. and Dolan, R.J. (2004) fMRI-Adaptation Reveals Dissociable Neural Representations of Identity and Expression in Face Perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1830-1839.

[32]   Sung, Y., Someya, Y., Eriko, Y., Choi, S.-H., Cho, Z.-H., and Ogawa, S. (2011) Involvement of Low-Level Visual Areas in Hemispheric Superiority for Face Processing. Brain Research, 1366, 54-59.

[33]   Rauss, K., Pourtois, G., Vuilleumier, P. and Schwartz, S. (2009) Attentional Load Modifies Early Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1723-1733.