OJOG  Vol.4 No.12 , August 2014
Is It Possible to Predict the Outcome of IVF Treatment in Poor Response Patients?
Abstract: Poor ovarian response (POR)—retrieval of 3 or fewer eggs, is a challenging issue in IVF. A retrospective study included POR women who underwent 386 IVF cycles. The data were classified in four groups according to women’s age (years) during the treatment cycle: 1) 20 - 34 (n = 133), 2) 35 - 39 (n = 133), 3) 40 - 42 (n = 78), 4) 43 - 47 y (n = 42), and correlated with the characteristics of the population. The clinical pregnancy rates for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were: 23.3%, 12%, 2.6%, 4.8%, respectively. It was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.001) comparing group 1 with group 3 patients. The “take home baby” rate was much lower (p < 0.001) in group 3; there were no deliveries in group 4. Delivery rates for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were: 19.5%, 10.5%, 1.3% and 0%, respectively. Intraabdominal adhesions were more common (p = 0.005) as the cause of infertility in group 3 women compared to groups 2 and 1: 24.4% compared with 9% and 9.8%, respectively. According to multivariate regression analysis, the parameters that negatively reflect on the pregnancy rate in POR women are intraabdominal adhesions, POR in the past, and increased age. We suggest encouraging young POR patients to pursue IVF treatments since the “take home baby” rates are reasonably good.
Cite this paper: Uretzky, A. , Harlev, A. , Man, L. , Lunenfeld, E. , Har-Vardi, I. , Friger, M. and Levitas, E. (2014) Is It Possible to Predict the Outcome of IVF Treatment in Poor Response Patients?. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 703-709. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2014.412098.

[1]   Saldeen, P., Kallen, K. and Sundstrom, P. (2007) The Probability of Successful IVF Outcome after Poor Ovarian Response. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86, 457-461.

[2]   Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2007) Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States: 2001 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 1253-1266.

[3]   Ferraretti, A.P., La Marca, A., Fauser, B.C., Tarlatis, B., Nargund, G., Gianaroli, L. and ESHRE Working Group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition (2011) ESHRE Consensus on the Definition of “Poor Response” to Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization: The Bologna Criteria. Human Reproduction, 26, 1616-1624.

[4]   Baker, V.L., Luke, B., Brown, M.B., Alvero, R., Frattarelli, J.L., Usadi, R., Grainger, D.A. and Armstrong, A.Y. (2010) Multivariate Analysis of Factors Affecting Probability of Pregnancy and Live Birth with in Vitro Fertilization: An Analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Fertility and Sterility, 94, 1410-1416.

[5]   Speroff, L. (1994) The Effect of Aging on Fertility. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 6, 115-120.

[6]   Tan, S.L., Royston, P., Campbell, S., Jacobs, H.S., Betts, J., Mason, B. and Edwards, R.G. (1992) Cumulative Conception and Livebirth Rates after in-Vitro Fertilisation. The Lancet, 339, 1390-1394.

[7]   Beckers, N.G., Macklon, N.S., Eijkemans, M.J. and Fauser, B.C. (2002) Women with Regular Menstrual Cycles and a Poor Response to Ovarian Hyperstimulation for in Vitro Fertilization Exhibit Follicular Phase Characteristics Suggestive of Ovarian Aging. Fertility and Sterility, 78, 291-297.

[8]   De Vos, M., Devroey, P. and Fauser, B.C. (2010) Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. The Lancet, 376, 911-921.

[9]   Shah, D.K. (2013) Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Endometriosis: Insult upon Injury. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 31, 144-149.

[10]   Kaump, G.R. and Spies, J.B. (2013) The Impact of Uterine Artery Embolization on Ovarian Function. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 24, 459-467.

[11]   Celik, H., Bildircin, D., Guven, D., Cetinkaya, M.B., Alper, T. and Batuoglu, A.S. (2012) Random Anti-Mullerian Hormone Predicts Ovarian Response in Women with High Baseline Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels: Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Poor Responders in Assisted Reproductive Treatment. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29, 797-802.

[12]   Hendriks, D.J., Mol, B.W., Bancsi, L.F., TeVelde, E.R. and Broekmans, F.J. (2005) Antral Follicle Count in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response and Pregnancy after in Vitro Fertilization: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison with Basal Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Level. Fertility and Sterility, 83, 291-301.

[13]   Ng, E.H., Tang, O.S. and Ho, P.C. (2000) The Significance of the Number of Antral Follicles Prior to Stimulation in Predicting Ovarian Responses in an IVF Programme. Human Reproduction, 15, 1937-1942.

[14]   Kyrou, D., Kolibianakis, E.M., Venetis, C.A., Papanikolaou, E.G., Bontis, J. and Tarlatzis, B.C. (2009) How to Improve the Probability of Pregnancy in Poor Responders Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 749-766.

[15]   Shanbhag, S., Aucott, L., Bhattacharya, S., Hamilton, M.A. and McTavish, A.R. (2007) Interventions for “Poor Responders” to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) in in-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 1, Article ID: CD004379.

[16]   TeVelde, E.R. and Pearson, P.L. (2002) The Variability of Female Reproductive Ageing. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 141-154.

[17]   Nasseri, A., Mukherjee, T., Grifo, J.A., Noyes, N., Krey, L. and Copperman, A.B. (1999) Elevated Day 3 Serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone and/or Estradiol May Predict Fetal Aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility, 71, 715-718.

[18]   Trout, S.W. and Seifer, D.B. (2000) Do Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Have Higher Day 3 Serum FSH and Estradiol Values? Fertility and Sterility, 74, 335-337.

[19]   van Montfrans, J.M., van Hooff, M.H., Martens, F. and Lambalk, C.B. (2002) Basal FSH, Estradiol and Inhibin B Concentrations in Women with a Previous Down’s Syndrome Affected Pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 17, 44-47.

[20]   El-Toukhy, T., Khalaf, Y., Hart, R., Taylor, A. and Braude, P. (2002) Young Age Does Not Protect against the Adverse Effects of Reduced Ovarian Reserve—An Eight Year Study. Human Reproduction, 17, 1519-1524.

[21]   Polyzos, N.P., Blockeel, C., Verpoest, W., De Vos, M., Stoop, D., Vloeberghs, V., Camus, M., Devroey, P. and Tournayé, H. (2012) Live Birth Rates Following Natural Cycle IVF in Women with Poor Ovarian Response According to the Bologna Criteria. Human Reproduction, 27, 3481-3486.

[22]   Goverde, A.J., McDonnell, J., Schats, R., Vermeiden, J.P., Homburg, R. and Lambalk, C.B. (2005) Ovarian Response to Standard Gonadotrophin Stimulation for IVF Is Decreased Not Only in Older But Also in Younger Women in Couples with Idiopathic and Male Subfertility. Human Reproduction, 20, 1573-1577.

[23]   Molloy, D., Martin, M., Speirs, A., Lopata, A., Clarke, G., McBain, J., Ngu, A. and Johnston, I.H. (1987) Performance of Patients with a “Frozen Pelvis” in an in Vitro Fertilization Program. Fertility and Sterility, 47, 450-455.

[24]   Oehninger, S., Scott, R., Muasher, S.J., Acosta, A.A., Jones Jr., H.W. and Rosenwaks, Z. (1989) Effects of the Severity of Tubo-Ovarian Disease and Previous Tubal Surgery on the Results of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. Fertility and Sterility, 51, 126-130.

[25]   Keay, S.D., Barlow, R., Eley, A., Masson, G.M., Anthony, F.W. and Jenkins, J.M. (1998) The Relation between Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and Poor Ovarian Response to Gonadotropin Stimulation before in Vitro Fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 70, 214-218.

[26]   Brodin, T., Bergh, T., Berglund, L., Hadziosmanovic, N. and Holte, J. (2008) Menstrual Cycle Length Is an AgeIndependent Marker of Female Fertility: Results from 6271 Treatment Cycles of in Vitro Fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 1656-1661.