JMP  Vol.5 No.14 , August 2014
A Perdurable Defence to Weyl’s Unified Theory
ABSTRACT

Einstein dealt a lethal blow to Weyl’s unified theory by arguing that Weyl’s theory was at the very bestbeautiful, and at the very least, un-physical, because its concept of variation of the length of a vector from one point of space to the other meant that certain absolute quantities, such as the “fixed” spacing of atomic spectral lines and the Compton wavelength of an Electron for example, would change arbitrarily as they would have to depend on their prehistories. This venomous criticism of Einstein to Weyl’s theory remains much alive today as it was on the first day Einstein pronounced it. We demonstrate herein that one can overcome Einstein’s criticism by recasting Weyl’s theory into a new Weyl-kind of theory were the length of vectors are preserved as is the case in Riemann geometry. In this New Weyl Theory, the Weyl gauge transformation of the Riemann metric gμν and the Maxwellian electromagnetic field Aμ are preserved.


Cite this paper
Nyambuya, G. (2014) A Perdurable Defence to Weyl’s Unified Theory. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 1244-1253. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.514124.
References
[1]   Straub, W.O. (2013) On the Failure of Weyl’s 1918 Theory.
http://vixra.org/abs/1401.0168

[2]   Straub, W.O. (2013) Some Observations on Schrodinger’s Affine Connection.
http://vixra.org/abs/1402.0151

[3]   Afriat, A. (2008) How Weyl Stumbled across Electricity While Pursuing Mathematical Justice. arXiv:0804.2947v1

[4]   Pais, A. (2005) Subtle Is the Lord. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[5]   Weyl, H.K.H. (1927) Zeitschrift fur Physik, 56, 330-352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01339504

[6]   Weyl, H.K.H. (1927) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15, 323-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.4.323

[7]   Einstein, A. (1952) Sidelights on Relativity. Dover, New York.

[8]   Eddington, A.S. (1921) A Generalisation of Weyl’s Theory of the Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 99, 104-122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1921.0027

[9]   Dirac, P.A.M. (1973) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 333, 403-418.

[10]   Cattani, C., Scalia, M., Laserra, E., Bochicchio, I. and Nandi, K.K. (2013) Physical Review D, 87, Article ID: 047503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.047503

[11]   Scholz, E. (2011) Weyl Geometry in Late 20th Century Physics. arXiv:1111.3220v1 [math.HO]

[12]   Einstein, A. and Straus, E.G. (1946.) Annals of Mathematics, 47, 731. [See also: Einstein, A. (1948) Reviews of Modern Physics, 20, 35; Einstein, A. (1950) Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 2, 120.]

[13]   Schrodinger, E. (1948) Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 52, 1-9.

[14]   Schrodinger, E. (1945) Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 51, 163-171.

[15]   Schrodinger, E. (1945) Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 51, 205-216.

 
 
Top