Loudness Summation and Weightings for Loudness and Environmental Noise Assessment

Juhani  Parmanen

doi:10.4236/oja.2014.43011

Juhani Parmanen

Abstract: A stationary loudness model has been built up on the basis of the former ISO 226: 1987 concerning equal-loudness-level contours. The loudness and loudness level expressions derived in the study include the same parameters as used when determining the equal-loudness-level contours of the former ISO standard. However, as an additional main idea, a loudness summation rule has been proposed in the study. Moreover, the loudness expressions have been normalised to give the same values for people who have a similar sense of hearing. It has also been found that the loudness expressions include basically two different weightings. The first weighting is a conservative frequency weighting in the domain of sound pressure level, and the second weighting consists of coefficients applied to the weighted sound pressure levels. The latter have the greatest effect on the very low-frequency range. Finally, the paper includes a new way to use the A-weighting which takes into account the compressed character of the equal-loudness-level contours at the low frequency range. This method remarkably transforms the character of the A-weighting as a measure for low-frequency environmental noise.

Keywords: Loudness, Loudness Level, Loudness Summation, Frequency Weightings, A-Weighting, Low Frequency Noise

Cite this paper: Parmanen, J. (2014) Loudness Summation and Weightings for Loudness and Environmental Noise Assessment. Open Journal of Acoustics, 4, 105-114. doi: 10.4236/oja.2014.43011.

References

[1] Parmanen, J. (2007) A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level as a Loudness/Annoyance Indicator for Environmental Sounds—Could It Be Improved? Applied Acoustics, 68, 58-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.02.004

[2] Stevens, S. (1961) The Psychophysics of Sensory Function. In: Rosenblith, W., Ed., Sensory Communication, MIT Press, Boston.

[3] International Standardization Organization. ISO 226: 1987 (E) Acoustics—Normal Equal-Loudness-Level Contours. Geneva.

[4] International Standardization Organization. ISO 226: 2003 (E) Acoustics—Normal Equal-Loudness-Level Contours. Geneva.

[5] International Standardization Organization. ISO 532: 1975 (E) Acoustics—Method for Calculating Loudness Level. Geneva.

[6] International Standardization Organization. ISO 131: 1979 (E) Acoustics—Expression of Physical and Subjective Magnitudes of Sound or Noise in Air. Geneva.

[7] Parmanen, J. (2012) Some Reasons to Revise the International Standard ISO 226: 2003: Acoustics—Normal Equal- Loudness-Level Contours. Open Journal of Acoustics, 2, 143-149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oja.2012.24016

[8] Tachibana, H., Hamada, Y. and Sato, F. (1988) Loudness Evaluation of Sounds Transmitted through Walls—Basic Experiments with Artificial Sounds. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 127, 499-506.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(88)90375-6

[9] Tachibana, H., Yano, H. and Sonoda, Y. (1990) Subjective Assessment of Indoor Noises—Basic Experiments with Artificial Sounds. Applied Acoustics, 31, 173-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-682X(90)90059-4

[10] Tachibana, H., Sonoda, Y., Iwamoto, K., Kuwano, S. and Namba, S. (1993) Validity of Arithmetic Average of Sound Pressure Levels in Octave Bands as a Loudness Index. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E), 14, 197-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1250/ast.14.197

[11] Hellman, R. and Zwicker, E. (1987) Why Can a Decrease in dB(A) Produce an Increase in Loudness? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1700-1705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.395162

[12] Schomer, P.D. (2000) Loudness-Level Weighting for Environmental Noise Assessment. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 86, 49-61.

[13] Salt, A.N. and Lichtenhan, J.T. (2014) How Does Wind Turbine Noise Affect People? Acoustics Today, 10, 20-28.