OJPP  Vol.4 No.3 , August 2014
Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations
Abstract: Text interpretations are usually leading to ambiguous results. This is especially the case for the interpretation of Max Weber’s methodology. I discuss Thomas Burger’s interpretation that Weber applied Rickert’s methodology and that he never developed his own standpoint regarding the methodological problems. In contrast to this view, I propose an alternative interpretation based on the Methodenstreitin economics and the philosophies of Kant and Rickert. In my opinion Weber offered a very unique solution to an old philosophical problem, which resulted in a complete break with the Platonic and Aristotelian tradition. His solution is what I call the postulate of internal consistency (a logical consistent application of an arbitrary scheme of interpretation). I will use Popper’s method of deductive falsification to decide if Burger’s or my interpretation produces fewer contradictions.
Cite this paper: Etzrodt, C. (2014) Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 345-359. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43038.

[1]   Antoni, C. (1959). From History to Sociology. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

[2]   Burger, T. (1976). Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation. Durham: Duke University Press.

[3]   Fleischmann, E. (1964). De Weber à Nietzsche. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 5, 190-238.

[4]   Freund, J. (1968). The Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Pantheon Books.

[5]   Hansen, R. (1968). Der Methodenstreit in den Sozialwissenschaften zwischen Gustav Schmoller und Karl Menger. In A. Diemer (Ed.), Beiträge zur Entwicklung der Wissenschaftstheorie im 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 137-173). Meisenheim: Hain.

[6]   Hayek, F. A. (1973). The Place of Menger’s Grundsätze in the History of Economic Thought. In J. R. Hicks, & W. Weber (Eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[7]   Hennis, W. (1994). Die volle Nüchternheit des Urteils. In G. Wagner, & H. Zipprian (Eds.), Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 105-145). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

[8]   Honigsheim, P. (1968). On Max Weber. New York: Free Press.

[9]   Hume, D. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[10]   Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

[11]   Menger, C. (1985). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York/ London: New York University Press.

[12]   Popper, K. R. (1987). Das Elend des Historizismus (6th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.

[13]   Popper. K. R. (1989). Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr.

[14]   Rickert, H. (1921a). Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis (4th/5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.

[15]   Rickert, H. (1921b). Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Tübingen: Mohr.

[16]   Rickert, H. (1921c). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft (4th/5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.

[17]   Scaff, L. A. (1984). Weber before Weberian Sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 35, 190-215.

[18]   Schluchter, W. (1989). Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press.

[19]   Tenbruck, F. H. (1959). Die Genesis der Methodologie Max Webers. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 11, 573-630.

[20]   Turner, S. P., & Factor, R. A. (1984). Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value. London: Routledge.

[21]   Voegelin, E. (1952). The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[22]   von Schelting, A. (1934). Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre: Das logische Problem der historischen Kulturerkenntnis. Tübingen: Mohr.

[23]   Weber, M. (1975). Max Weber: A Biography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

[24]   Weber, M. (1984). Max Weber: Ein Lebensbild. Tübingen: Mohr.

[25]   Weber, M. (1949). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe: Free Press.

[26]   Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology (Vol. 1). New York: Bedminster Press.

[27]   Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.

[28]   Weber, M. (1985). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.

[29]   Weber, M. (2012). Collected Methodological Writings. London/New York: Routledge.