Back
 AM  Vol.5 No.15 , August 2014
Predispatch of Hydroelectric Power Systems with Modifications in Network Topologies
Abstract: In this article, the primal-dual interior-point methods are used to minimize costs and losses in a predispatch model for the generation and transmission of direct current (DC) power flow in a hydroelectric system with pre-programmed manipulations; i.e., in cases of preventive maintenance, within a period of twenty-four hours. From the computational standpoint, the effort required to solve a problem with and without manipulations is similar, and the reasons why will be also discussed in this study. Computational results prove these findings.
Cite this paper: Carvalho, S. and Oliveira, A. (2014) Predispatch of Hydroelectric Power Systems with Modifications in Network Topologies. Applied Mathematics, 5, 2271-2283. doi: 10.4236/am.2014.515221.
References

[1]   Garzillo, A., Innorta, M. and Ricci, R. (1999) The Flexibility of Interior Point Based Power Flow Algorithms Facing Critical Network Situations. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 21, 579-584.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-0615(99)00020-4

[2]   Momoh, J.A., El-Hawary, M.E. and Adapa, R. (1999) A Review of Selected Optimal Power Flow Literature to 1993, Part II Newton, Linear Programming and Interior Point Methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14, 105-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.744495

[3]   Quintana, V.H., Torres, G.L. and Palomo, J.M. (2000) Interior Point Methods and Their Applications to Power Systems: A Classification of Publications and Software Codes. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15, 170-176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.852117

[4]   Ohishi, T., Soares, S. and Carvalho, M.F. (1991) Short Term Hydrothermal Scheduling Approach for Dominantly Hydro Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6, 637-643.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.76707

[5]   Stott, B., Jardim, J. and Alsac, O. (2009) DC Power Flow Revisited. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24, 1290-1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021235

[6]   Oliveira, A.R.L., Soares, S. and Nepomuceno, L. (2005) Short Term Hydroelectric Scheduling Combining Network Flow and Interior Point Approaches. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 27, 91-99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2004.07.009

[7]   Soares, S. and Salmazo, C.T. (1997) Minimum Loss Predispatch Model for Hydroelectric Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 12, 1220-1228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.630464

[8]   Oliveira, A.R.L., Soares, S. and Nepomuceno, L. (2003) Optimal Active Power Dispatch Combining Network Flow and Interior Point Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18, 1235-1240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.814851

[9]   Ahuja, R., Magnanti, T. and Orlin, J.B. (1993) Network Flows. Prentice Hall, United States.

[10]   Carvalho, S. and Oliveira, A.R.L. (2012) Interior Point Method Applied to the Predispatch Problem of a Hydroelectric with Scheduled Line Manipulations. American Journal of Operations Research, 2, 266-271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2012.22032

[11]   Carvalho, L.M.R. and Oliveira, A.R.L. (2009) Primal Dual Interior Point Method Appliede to the Short Term Hydroelectric Scheuling Including a Perturbing Parameter. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 7, 533-539.

[12]   Duff, I.S., Erisman, A.M. and Reid, J.K. (1986) Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[13]   Franco, P., Carvalho, M.F. and Soares, S. (1994) A Network Flow Model for Short-Term Hydro-Dominated Hydrothermal Scheduling Problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9, 1016-1021.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.317642

[14]   Oliveira, A.R.L. and Soares, S. (2003) Métodos de pontos interiores para problema de fluxo de potência ótimo DC, SBA. Controle & Automação, 14, 278-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-17592003000300007

 
 
Top