OJS  Vol.4 No.5 , August 2014
Does Education Affect Individual Well-Being? Some Italian Empirical Evidences
ABSTRACT

Using data from the last European Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), this paper focuses on the measurement of well-being and on its association with education. EU-SILC survey gives information on several aspects of people’s daily life (i.e. housing, labour, health, education, finance, material deprivation and possession of durables) allowing a multi-dimensional approach to the study of well-being, poverty and social exclusion. For our aims we have considered only survey data collected in Italy. Due to the multidimensionality of well-being concept, we have selected some variables related principally to four main dimensions of well-being, which are financial endowment, housing conditions and goods possessions, health status, and environment. A first explanatory analysis via multivariate regression model has highlighted the effect of education on the factors considered. Finally, a latent class regression analysis has been used to cluster individuals into mutually exclusive latent classes which identify different intensities of well-being (the latent trait) taking into account the effect of education in the membership probability of each latent class.


Cite this paper
Giambona, F. , Porcu, M. and Sulis, I. (2014) Does Education Affect Individual Well-Being? Some Italian Empirical Evidences. Open Journal of Statistics, 4, 319-329. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2014.45032.
References
[1]   Boarini, R., Johansson, A. and Mira d’Ercole, M. (2006) Alternative Measures of Well-Being. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 476, OECD Publishing, Paris.

[2]   Kuznets, S. (1934) National Income, 1929-1932. Senate Document No. 124, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session.

[3]   Nordhaus, W.D. and Tobin, J. (1973) Is Growth Obsolete? Columbia University Press, Columbia.

[4]   Jones, C.J. and Klenow, P.J. (2010) Beyond GDP? Welfare across Countries and Time. WP No. 16352, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w16352

[5]   OECD (2011) Compendium od OECD Well-Being Indicators. OECD, Paris.

[6]   Headey, B.W., Muffels, R.J.A. and Wooden, M. (2004) Money Doesn’t Buy Happiness or Does It? A Reconsideration Based on the Combined Effects of Wealth, Income and Consumption. IZA Discussion Papers 1218, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.

[7]   Van Praag, B.M.S., Frijters, P. and Ferrer-i-Carbonel, A. (2003) The Anatomy of Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3

[8]   Rapley, M. (2003) Quality of Life Research. A Critical Introduction. Sage, London.

[9]   Desjardins, R. (2008) Researching the Links between Education and Well-Being. European Journal of Education, 43, 23-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00333.x

[10]   Noll, H.H. (2006) European Survey Data: Rich Sources for Quality of Life Research. ISQOLS Conference “Prospects for Quality of Life in the New Millennium”, Grahamstown, 17-20 July 2006.

[11]   Stutzer, A. and Frey, B.S. (2010) Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being. Social Research, 77, 679-714.

[12]   Maasoumi, E. and Nickelsburg, G. (1988) Multidimensional Measures of Well-Being and an Analysis of Inequality in the Michigan Data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 6, 327-334.

[13]   Cnel-Istat (2013) Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. Cnel-Istat, Roma.

[14]   Cheli, B., Lecchini, L. and Masserini, L. (2002) An Ordinal Logit Model for Subjective Well-Being among the Italian Older Adults. In: Blasius, J., Hox, J., De Leeuw, E. and Smidt, P., Eds., Social Science Methodology in the New Millennium, Leske & Budrich, Opladen.

[15]   Fleche, S., Smith, C. and Sorsa P. (2011) Exploring Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing in OECD Countries: Evidence from the World Value Survey. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 921, OECD Publishing, Paris.

[16]   Decanq, K. and Lugo, M.A. (2010) Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Well-Being: An Overview. CES Discussion Paper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.

[17]   Wolff, E.N. and Zacharias, A. (2009) Household Wealth and the Measurement of Economic Well-Being in the United States. Journal of Economic Inequality, 7, 83-115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10888-007-9068-6

[18]   Hartog, J. and Oosterbeek, H. (1998) Health, Wealth and Happiness: Why Pursue a Higher Education? Economics of Education Review, 17, 245-256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(97)00064-2

[19]   Headey, B. and Warren, D. (2008) Families, Incomes and Jobs. A Statistical Report on Waves 1 to 5 of the HILDA Survey, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

[20]   Cummins, R. (2000) Objective and Subjective Quality of Life: An Interactive Model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007027822521

[21]   Hickson, H. and Dockery, A. (2008) Is Ignorance Bliss? In: Alam, K., Ed., Exploring the Links between Education, Expectations and Happiness, in: Australian Conference of Economists, Economic Society of Australia (Queensland) Inc., Brisbane, 1-24.

[22]   Becker, G.S. (1962) Human Capital. Columbia University Press, New York.

[23]   Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P. and Richardson, D. (2006) Comparing Child Well-Being in OECD Countries: Concepts and Methods. Working Paper, Unicef.

[24]   Easterlin, R.A. (1974) Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In: David. P.A. and Reder, M.W., Eds., Nations and Households in Economic Growth, Academic Press, New York, 89-125.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7

[25]   Peiró, A. (2006) Happiness, Satisfaction and Socio-Economic Conditions: Some International Evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 348-365.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.042

[26]   Veenhoven, R. (1996) Developments in Satisfaction Research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00300268

[27]   Dockery, A.M. (2010) Education and Happiness in the School-to-Work Transition. NCVER Research Report No. 2239.

[28]   Boarini, R. and Strauss, H. (2010) What Is the Private Return to Tertiary Education? New Evidence from 21 OECD Countries. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 1, 7-31.

[29]   Sianesi, B. and Van Reenen, J. (2003) The Returns to Education: Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17, 157-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00192

[30]   Miyamoto, K. and Chevalier, A. (2010) Education and Health, OECD. Improving Health and Social Cohesion through Education, Chapter 4, 111-180.

[31]   De Looper, M. and Lafortune, G. (2009) Measuring Disparities in Health Status and in Access and Use of Health Care in OECD Countries. OECD Health WP, No. 43, OECD Publishing, Paris.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/225748084267

[32]   Baker, F.B. and Kim, S.H. (2004) Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

[33]   Rizopoulos, D. (2006) ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modelling and Item Response Theory Analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1-25.

[34]   Samejima, F. (1969) Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society, Richmond.

[35]   Leckie, G. and Charlton, C. (2013) runMLwiN—A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modelling Software from within Stata. Journal of Statistical Software, 52, 1-40.

[36]   Linzer, D.A. and Lewis, J.B. (2011) poLCA: A R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1-29.

[37]   Vermunt, J.K. (2008) Latent Class and Finite Mixture Models for Multilevel Data Sets. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17, 33-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280207081238

[38]   Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471249688

[39]   Lanza, S.T., Collins, L.M., Lemmon, D.R. and Schafer, J.L. (2007) PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 671-694.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575602

 
 
Top