JTTs  Vol.4 No.3 , July 2014
Transport Policy—The Perspective of Swedish Stakeholders
Abstract: Differences between countries’ internalization degrees and between transport modes both tend to risk distorting competition and creating socioeconomic inefficiency. This review examines regulations and charges for freight transports for different transport modes in Sweden and compares the situation with other key European countries. The aim was to identify best practices and benchmarking for Swedish conditions. The project involved both a literature study and interviews with different stakeholders. It was found that today’s fee structure for goods transports often deviated from the views of different stakeholders and market segments. The problem is that it is difficult to estimate and plan well in advance due to a lack of relevant data. Economic transport data are often extracted from heavily aggregated data where resource consumption and production costs for transport are unclear, preventing reliable estimates and obstructing the calculation of marginal costs and internalization of externalities through charges imposed on the respective transport modes and transport units. Furthermore, there is little research on how railroad and shipping are affected by changes and introduction of truck fees. The latter implies that truck fees must be seen from a European perspective to assess their effect on the overall transport system. Other aspects that are important to highlight are the extent and point in time for railroad deregulation. Further, it became clear from the stakeholder analysis that all fees and policies need to be both comprehensible and transparent through good communication of rules and by explaining the fee structures to all those concerned.
Cite this paper: Karlsson, H. , Bergqvist, R. and Brigelius, L. (2014) Transport Policy—The Perspective of Swedish Stakeholders. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 4, 175-186. doi: 10.4236/jtts.2014.43018.

[1]   Trafikverket (2011) Hojda banavgifter och deras effekter i ett trafikslagsovergripande perspektiv. Publikation: 2011: 080.

[2]   Nash, C., Sansom, T., and Matthews, M. (2001) Concerted Action on Transport Pricing Research Integration (CAPRI). Final Report for Publication, Co-Ordinated by the Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, January 2001.

[3]   Bryman, A. (2008) Samhallvetenskapliga metoder. Liber, Malmo.

[4]   Alises, A., Vassallo, J.M. and Guzman, A.F. (2014) Road Freight Transport Decoupling: A Comparative Analysis between the United Kingdom and Spain. Transport Policy, 32, 186-193.

[5]   Matthews, B., Evangelinos, C., Johnson, D. and Meunier, D. (2009) Impacts and Incentives of Differentiated Rail Infrastructure Charges in Europe—Focus on Freight. European Transport, 43, 83-112.

[6]   Nash, C. (2005) Rail Infrastructure Charges in Europe. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 39, 259-278.

[7]   Lindberg, G. (2009) CATRIN (Cost Allocation of Transport Infrastructure cost), Deliverable 12—Conclusions and Recommendations. Funded by Sixth Framework Programme, VTI, Stockholm.

[8]   Nelldal, B.-L., Troche, G. and Wajsman, J. (2009) Effekter av lastbilsavgifter—Analys av effekter av inforande av avstandsbaserade lastbilsavgifter pa konkurrens och samverkan mellan jarnvag och lastbil. Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan (KTH), Avdelningen for Trafik & Logistik, KTH Jarnvagsgruppen.

[9]   BMVIT (2014) Bundesministeriumfür Verkehr, Innovation undTechnologie.

[10]   European Commission (1999) EC Directive 1999/62/EC on the Charging of Heavy Goods Vehicles for the Use of Certain Infrastructures.

[11]   VTI (2013) Internalization of External Effects in European Freight Corridors. CTS Working Paper 2013: 2.

[12]   Berglund, C.-M. and Eriksson, R. (2003) Pa vag mot marginalkostnadsprissattning inom sjotransportsektorn. VTI meddelande 956.

[13]   Sjofartsverket (2002) Sjofartens avgiftsrelevanta marginalkostnader; Utvecklingsarbete under 2002. Redovisning av regeringsuppdrag, 31 December 2002.

[14]   Cullinane, K. and Bergqvist, R. (2014) Emission Control Areas and Their Impact on Maritime Transport, Transport Research Part D, 28D, 1-5.

[15]   Banverket (2011) Underlagsrapport. Avgifter i Banverkets Jarnvagsnatsbeskrivning 2011, F10-4086/TR00.

[16]   Hasselgren, B. (2013) Naringslivets transporter—Hur transportinfrastrukturen bli mer effektiv? KTH, Institutionen for Samhallsplanering och miljo.

[17]   Trafikanalys (2012) Transportsektorns samhallsekonomiska kostnader—Rapport 2012:3.