JBM  Vol.2 No.5 , July 2014
Development of a Duplex Real-Time PCR Method for the Pharmaceutical Rapid Microbial Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ABSTRACT
Objective: To develop a duplex real-time PCR assay for pharmaceutical rapid microbial detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: The specific primers and probes were designed to amplify the femB gene of S. aureus and the DNA gyrase subunit B gene of P. aeruginosa. The sensitivity of the system was detected by a multiple proportional dilution method. In order to examine the specificity of the system, other twenty-one bacteria strains were assayed simultaneously. Results: A highly sensitive and specific duplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa was established. The sensitivity was 50 copies/μL. The specificity was 100%. The whole detection procedure can be finished within 2.5 h. Conclusion: The duplex real-time PCR method is efficient in detecting with good sensitivity and specificity. There is a good prospect of this method applying in disease prevention and pharmaceutical industry due to the simultaneous detection of two pathogens.

Cite this paper
Lin, T. , Lin, L. and Zeng, P. (2014) Development of a Duplex Real-Time PCR Method for the Pharmaceutical Rapid Microbial Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 2, 12-19. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2014.25002.
References
[1]   Lowy, F.D. (1998) Staphylococcus aureus Infections. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 520-532.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199808203390806

[2]   Hoiby, N., Frederiksen, B. and Pressler, T. (2005) Eradication of Early Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 4, 49-54.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569199305000688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2005.05.018


[3]   Kiska, D.L. and Gilligan, P.H. (2003) Pseudomonas. In: Murray, P.R., Baron, E.J., Jorgensen, J.H., Pfaller, M.A. and Yolken, R.H., Eds., Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th Edition, American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 719-728.

[4]   Nogva, H.K., Bergh, A., Holck, A. and Rudi, K. (2000) Application of the 5’ Nuclease PCR Assay in Evaluation and Development of Methods for Quantitative Detection of Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 4029-4036.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.4029-4036.2000

[5]   Logan, J.M., Edwards, K.J., Saunders, N.A. and Stanley, J. (2001) Rapid Identification of Campylobacter spp. by Melting Peak Analysis of Biprobes in Real-Time PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39, 2227-2232.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.6.2227-2232.2001

[6]   Nogva, H.K., Naterstad, K.R.K., Holck, A. and Lillhaug, D. (2000) Application of 5’-Nuclease PCR for Quantitative Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Pure Cultures, Water, Skim Milk and Unpasteurised Whole Milk. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 4266-4271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4266-4271.2000

[7]   Chen, S., Yee, A., Griffiths, M., Larkin, C., Yamahiro, C.T., Behari, R., Paszko-Kolva, C., et al. (1997) The Evaluation of a Fluorogenic Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Salmonella Species in Food Commodities. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 35, 239-250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)01241-5

 
 
Top