JBiSE  Vol.7 No.9 , July 2014
Comparison between Different ESI Methods on Refractory Epilepsy Patients Shows a High Sensitivity for Bayesian Model Averaging
ABSTRACT
Electrical Source Imaging (ESI) is a non-invasive technique of reconstructing brain activities using EEG data. This technique has been applied to evaluate epilepsy patients being evaluated for epilepsy surgery, showing encouraging results for mapping interictal epileptiform discharges (IED). However, ESI is underused in planning epilepsy surgery. This is basically due to the wide availability of methods for solving the electromagnetism inverse problem (e-IP) associated to few studies using EEG setups similar to those most commonly used in clinical setting. In this study, we applied six different methods of solving the e-IP based on IEDs of 20 focal epilepsy patients that presented abnormalities in their MRI. We compared the ESI maps obtained by each method with the location of the abnormality, calculating the Euclidian distances from the center of the lesion to the closest border of the method solution (CL-BM) and also to the solution’s maxima (CL-MM). We also applied a score system in order to allow us to evaluate the sensitivity of each method for temporal and extra temporal patients. In our patients, the Bayesian Model Averaging method had a sensitivity of 86% and the shortest CL-MM. This method also had more restricted solutions that were more representative of epileptogenic activities than those obtained by the other methods.

Cite this paper
Maziero, D. , Castellanos, A. , Salmon, C. and Velasco, T. (2014) Comparison between Different ESI Methods on Refractory Epilepsy Patients Shows a High Sensitivity for Bayesian Model Averaging. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 7, 662-674. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2014.79066.
References
[1]   Helmholtz, H. (1853) UebereinigeGesetze der Vertheilungelektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leiternmit Anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen Versuche. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 9, 211-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.18531650603

[2]   Scherg, M. (1990) Fundamentals of Dipole Source Potential Analysis. In: Grandori, F. and Romani, G., Eds., Auditory Evoked Electric and Magnetic Fields. Topographic Mapping and Functional Localization. Advances in Audiology, 6, Basel, Karger, 40-69.

[3]   Hämäläinen, M.S. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. (1984) Interpreting Measured Magnetic Fields of the Brain: Estimates of Current Distributions. Technical Report TKK-FA559, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo.

[4]   Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Michel, C.M. and Lehmann, D. (1994) Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography: A New Method for Localizing Electrical Activity in the Brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 49-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X

[5]   Menendez, R.G.P., Gonzalez, S.L.A., Lantz, G., Michel, C.M. and Landis, T. (2001) Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. I. Method Descriptions and Simulations. Brain Topography, 14, 131-137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012944913650

[6]   BESA (2010) Research Tutorial 4: Distributed Source Imaging.
http://besa.de/tutorials/hands_on,Germany

[7]   Trujillo, N.J.B., Vázquez, E. and Valdés, P.A.S. (2004) Bayesian Model Averaging in EEG/MEG Imaging. NeuroImage, 21, 1300-1319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.008

[8]   Laehy, R., Mosher, J.C. and Phillips, J.W. (1996) A Comparative Study of Minimum Norm Methods for MEG Imaging. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Biomagnetism, Biomag’96, Santa Fe, 247-277.

[9]   Menendez, G.P.R. and Gonzalez S.L.A. (2002) Comparison of Algorithms for the Localization of Focal Sources: Evaluation with Simulated Data and Analysis of Experimental Data. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism (Online Journal).

[10]   Rusiniak, M., Lewandowska, M., Wolak, T., Pluta, A., Milner, R., Ganc, M., Wlodarczyk, A., Senderski, A., Sliwa, L. and Skarzyński, H. (2013) A Modified Oddball Paradigm for Investigation of Neural Correlates of Attention: A Simultaneous ERP-fMRI Study. MAGMA, 26, 511-526.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-013-0374-7

[11]   Merlet, I. and Gotman, J. (1999) Reliability of Dipole Models of Epileptic Spikes. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1013-1028.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00062-5

[12]   Krings, T., Chiappa, K.H., Cuffin, B.N., Buchbinder, B.R. and Cosgrove, G.R. (1998) Accuracy of Electroencephalographic Dipole Localization of Epileptiform Activities Associated with Focal Brain Lesions. Annals of Neurology, 44, 76-86.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.410440114

[13]   Ebersole, J.S. (1997) Defining Epileptogenic Foci: Past, Present, Future. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 14, 470-483.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199711000-00003

[14]   Michel, C.M., Menendez, G.P.R., Lantz, G., Gonzalez S.L.A., Spinelli, L., Blanke, O., Landis, T. and Seeck, M. (1999) Spatiotemporal EEG Analysis and Distributed Source Estimation in Presurgical Epilepsy Evaluation (Review). Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 16, 239-266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199905000-00005

[15]   Fuchs, M., Wagner, M., Kohler, T. and Wischmann, H.A. (1999) Linear and Nonlinear Current Density Reconstructions (Review). Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 16, 267-295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199905000-00006

[16]   Brodbeck, V., Spinelli, L., Lascano, A.M., Wissmeier, M., Vargas, M.I., Vulliemoz, S., Pollo, C., Schaller, K., Michel C.M. and Seeck, M. (2011) Electroencephalographic Source Imaging: A Prospective Study of 152 Operated Epileptic Patients. Brain, 134, 2887-2897.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr243

[17]   Lantz, G., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M., Menendez, G.P.R., Sottas, C.C. and Michel, C.M. (2003) Propagation of Interictal Epileptiform Activity Can Lead to Erroneous Source Localizations: A 128-Channel EEG Mapping Study. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 311-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-200309000-00003

[18]   Collins, D.L. (1994) 3D Model-Based Segmentation of Individual Brain Structures from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal.

[19]   Huppertz, H.J., Hoegg, S., Sick, C., Lücking, C.H., Zentner, J., Schulze-Bonhage, A. and Kristeva-Feige, R. (2011) Cortical Current Density Reconstruction of Interictal Epileptiform Activity in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1761-1772.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00588-0

[20]   Michel, C.M., Lantz, G., Spinelli, L., Menendez, G.P.R., Landis, T. and Seeck, M. (2004) 128-Channel EEG Source Imaging in Epilepsy: Clinical Yield and Localization Precision. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 21, 71-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-200403000-00001

[21]   Grech, R., Cassar, T., Muscat, J., Camilleri, K.P., Fabri, S.G., Zervakis, M., Xanthopoulos, P., Sakkalis, V. and Vanrumste, B. (2008) Review on Solving the Inverse Problem in EEG Source Analysis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 5, 25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-25

 
 
Top