OJMP  Vol.3 No.4 , July 2014
Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in South Korea

Results of previous studies from North America reported that only 14 out of the 20 items from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) were required to assess negative affect, somatic symptoms, and anhedonia. However, it remains unclear whether this three-factor structure of the CES-D would be valid in South Korea. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of the three-factor structure with a Korean version of the CES-D. The participants were Korean college students (N = 215), elementary school teachers (N = 234), and parents of elementary school students (N = 230). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the scale’s validity. Results indicated that the three-factor structure showed acceptable fit to data (comparative fit index = 0.95; root mean square error of approximation = 0.06). The findings indicated that the three-factor structure of the CES-D was valid in South Korea.

Cite this paper
Aoki, S. , Tsuda, A. , Horiuchi, S. , Kim, E. , Naruse, M. , Tsuchiyagaito, A. and Hong, K. (2014) Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in South Korea. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 3, 301-305. doi: 10.4236/ojmp.2014.34031.
[1]   Cho, M.J. and Kim, K.H. (1998) Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in Korea. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 304-310.

[2]   Cho, M.J., Nam, J.J. and Suh, G.H. (1998) Prevalence of Symptoms of Depression in a Nationwide Sample of Korean Adults. Psychiatry Research, 81, 341-352.

[3]   American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder 5. Washington DC.

[4]   Carleton, R.N., Thibodeau, M.A., Teale, M.J.N., Welch, P.G., Abrams, M.P., Robinson, T. and Asmundson, G.J.G. (2013) The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A Review with a Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Item Content and Factor Structure. PloS One, 8, Article ID: e58067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058067

[5]   Judd, L.L., Akiskal, H.S. and Paulus, M.P. (2003) The Role and Clinical Significance of Subsyndromal Depressive Symptoms (SSD) in Unipolar Major Depressive Disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 5-18.

[6]   Sharpley, C.F. and Bitsika, V. (2013) Differences in Neurobiological Pathways of Four “Clinical Content” Subtypes of Depression. Behavioural Brain Research, 256, 368-376.

[7]   Schafer, A.B. (2006) Meta-Analysis of the Factor Structures of Four Depression Questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and Zung. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 123-146.

[8]   Horiuchi, S., Tsuda, A. and Sakano, Y. (2013) Relationships between Practicing Effective Stress Management and Depressive Symptoms. Japanese Journal of Stress Sciences, 27, 234.

[9]   Chon, K.K., Choi, S.C. and Yang, B.C. (2001) Integrated Adaptation of CES-D in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 59-76.

[10]   Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.

[11]   MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W. and Sugawara, H.M. (1996) Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.