Differences in Demographic Characteristics of Potential Acquirers of Real Estate Rights: Cases from Slovenia and Japan

Bojan  Grum

doi:10.4236/cus.2014.22011

Bojan Grum^*

Abstract: The aim of the study was to explore the role of demographic characteristics of potential acquirers of real estate rights. We were interested in whether the participants according to different origins of cultures and the basic demographic characteristics reflect a statistically significant difference. Results show that the participants who enter the Japanese real estate market are mainly male participants, who are single and have no children, and show a tendency to live in the city centre. Participants of both sexes enter the Slovene property market equally. On average they are married, childless and with a tendency to live at the outskirts of the city or inside agglomeration. Slovene participants expressed significantly higher satisfaction with the current residential status, which we relate to the findings that apartment owners compared to tenants express higher satisfaction with their living environment and are socially more active in their living environment.

Keywords: Real Estates, Demographic Characteristics, Comparison of Cultures, Slovenia, Japan

Cite this paper: Grum, B. (2014) Differences in Demographic Characteristics of Potential Acquirers of Real Estate Rights: Cases from Slovenia and Japan. Current Urban Studies, 2, 105-115. doi: 10.4236/cus.2014.22011.

References

[1] Aging Report 2009 (2009). Economic and budgetary projections in the EU-27, Member States (2008-2060). Brussels: European Commission 2009.

[2] Basti?, M. (2006). Metode raziskovanja. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta Maribor.

[3] Brade?ko, J. (2003). Trg nepremi?nin in Centralna banka. In A. Ko?ar (Ed.), Poslovanje z nepremi?ninami. 14. Tradicionalno strokovno sre?anje (pp. 16-25). Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije: Zbornik referatov.

[4] Cohen, D. H., Kozak, R. A., Vidal, N., Spetic, W., & Ide, R. (2005). Performance Expectations and Needs of the Japanese House Consumer. Forest Products Journal, 55, 37-44.

[5] Cirman, A. (2007). Strategija rabe stanovanja mora biti usklajena s strategijo gospodarskega razvoja: Stanovanjska raba. In Posvet na temo: Razli?ni nameni rabe stanovanj. Ljubljana: Dr?avni svet RS. http://www.ds-rs.si/kb/posveti/?View=entry&EntryID=61

[6] Deutsch, E., Tiwari, P., & Moriizumi, Y. (2005). The Slowdown in the Timing of Housing Purchases in Japan in the 1990s. Journal of Housing Economics, 15, 230-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2006.09.007

[7] Drobne, S., Grilj, T., & Lisec, A. (2009). Dejavnost trga nepremi?nin v Sloveniji v obdobju 2000-2006. Geodetski vestnik, 53, 543-560.

[8] Fulgosi, A. (1984). Faktorska analiza. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet v Zagrebu.

[9] Grum, B. (2010). Primerjava pri?akovanj potencialnih kupcev nepremi?nin glede pridobitve nepremi?ninskih pravic v razli?nih kulturnih obdobjih: Primer Slovenije in Japonske, Ph.D. Theses, Nova Gorica: Evropska pravna fakulteta.

[10] Hirayama, Y. (2008). Women’s Marital Status and Housing Tenure in the Context of Japan’s Home-Owning Society. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 73, 1045-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.3130/aija.73.1045

[11] Ho?evar, M., Kos, D., Makarovi?, J., Tr?ek, F., ?tebe, J., & Ur?i?, M. (2004). Vrednote prostora in okolja. CRP, Kon- kuren?nost Slovenije 2001-2006. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za dru?bene vede, Center za prostorsko sociologijo.

[12] IPSS (1998). Overview of Households Projections for Japan. Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research.

[13] Ishikawa, T. (2005). Japan’s Housing Market Enters a Transition Period. Tokyo: Economic Research Department of Japan. http://www.nli-research.co.jp/english/economics/2005/eco050829.pdf

[14] Makino, C. (2009). Residential Investment in Japan. http://www.fudousan-kanteishi.or.jp/english/material_e/makino_e/makino_e.html

[15] Mandi?, S. (1995). Stanovanje in dr?ava. Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicisti?no sredi??e Ljubljana.

[16] Mandi?, S. (2006). Stanovanje in kakovost ?ivljenja. In S. Mandi? (Ed.), Razvojno raziskovalni projekt stanovanjska anketa, Zaklju?no poro?ilo (pp. 7-37). Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za dru?bene vede, In?titut za dru?bene vede.

[17] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) (2009). Summary of White Paper on Land (2009). Tokyo. http://tochi.mlit.go.jp/english/

[18] Official Statistics of Japan (2010). Yearly Average of Monthly Disbursements per Household. Tokyo. http://www.estat.go.jp/SG1/estat/GL38020103.do?_toGL38020103_&listID=000001055111&requestSender=estat

[19] P?under, I. (2009). Demografske spremembe in trg nepremi?nin. 5. Portoro?: Planet GV, Slovenska nepremi?ninska konfe- renca, 5-12.

[20] P?under, I., & Ferlan, N. (2009). Subjektivno dojemanje vplivnih faktorjev pri ocenjevanju vrednosti nepremi?ninskih pravic. Portoro?: In?titut za nepremi?nine, Zbornik referatov 20. posveta Poslovanje z nepremi?ninami: Dr?ava, dr?avljani, stano- vanja, 246-251.

[21] RREEF Research (2009). Japan Quarterly 2Q 2009. Tokyo. https://www.rreef.com/cps/rde/xbcr/ai_en/RREEF_-_Japan_Quarterly_2Q_2009.pdf

[22] Rohe, W. M., Zandth, S., & McCarthy, G. (2001). The Social Benefits and Costs of Homeownership: A Critical Assessment of the Research. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.

[23] Rohe, W. M., & Basolo, V. (1997). Long-Term Effects of Homeownership on the Self-Perceptions and Social Interaction of Low-Income Persons. Environment and Behavior, 29, 793-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916597296004

[24] Rohe, M. W., & Stegman, M. (1994). The Impact of Home Ownership on the Social and Political Involvement of Low-In- come People. Urban Affairs, 152-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004208169403000108

[25] Rohe, M. W., & Stewart, L. S. (1996). Home Ownership and Neighborhood Stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7, 7-81. Statisti?ni urad RS (SURS) (2009). Slovenija v ?tevilkah 2009. Ljubljana. http://www.stat.si/

[26] Tarik, M. (1990). The Impact of the Surrounding Environment on People’s Perception of Major Urban Environmental Attri- butes. Architecture and Planning, 2, 43-60.

[27] Temeljotov Salaj, A., & Zupan?i?, D. (2006).Odnos do nepremi?nin in organizacijskega okolja. Ljubljana: Slovenski in?titut za revizijo.

[28] Thomas, M. (2008). Generation Y and Housing, Carpe Diem. The Australian Journal of Business and Informatics, 4, 111- 119.

[29] Tomoko, K. (2010). Decision-Making Process on Residential Choice of Condominium Residents: A Case Study of the Residents in Down-Town Area of Local City, Japan. Japanese Journal of Human Geography (Jimbun-Chiri), 62, 1-29.

[30] Tr?ek, F. (2005). Sociolo?ka anketna raziskava, Prenova stanovanjskih sosesk v Ljubljani—Savsko naselje. Urbani Izziv, 16, 24-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-2005-16-02-003

[31] Walonic, D. S. (2007). Survival Statistics. Bloomington, MN: StatPac, Inc..

[32] Wong, J. T. Y., & Hui, E. C. M. (2006). Power of Expectations. Property Management, 24, 496-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02637470610710547