ME  Vol.5 No.7 , June 2014
The Case for a Pragmatic Qualitative Appraisal Framework for Local Economic Development
Abstract: This paper develops a theoretical framework and rationale for an alternative post-structuralist approach to assessing economic development strategies. This research applies Deleuzian philosophical concepts in order to address the limitations of current assessment methodologies. The paper explores the history of and the reasons for the perceived failure of the Auckland Regional Economic Development Strategy (AREDS). This perceived failure led to the total de-territorialsiation of the organisation tasked with implementing the strategy. Deleuzian spatial concepts, such as flows, plateaus, rhizomes and lines of flight, are employed to develop metaphorical tools for assessing economic development strategies, initiatives and programmes. The framework developed is tested against AREDS. The paper concludes that such strategies and local initiatives should be assessed based on performance predicated on becoming instead of performance-measured outcomes.
Cite this paper: Rowe, J. (2014) The Case for a Pragmatic Qualitative Appraisal Framework for Local Economic Development. Modern Economy, 5, 761-773. doi: 10.4236/me.2014.57070.

[1]   Hillier, J. (2011) Strategic Navigation across Multiple Planes: Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning. Town Planning Review, 82, 503-527.

[2]   Hillier, J. (2007) Stretching beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot.

[3]   Semetsky, I. (2003) Deleuze’s New Image of Thought, or Dewey Revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35, 17-29.

[4]   May, T. (2001) The Ontology and Politics of Gilles Deleuze. Theory and Event, 5.

[5]   Bonta, M. and Protevi, J. (2004) Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

[6]   Hillier, J. (2011) Encountering Gilles Deleuze in Another Place. European Planning Studies, 9, 861-885.

[7]   Hillier, J. and Van Wezemael, J. (2008) “Empty, Swept and Garnished”: The Public Finance Initiative Case of Throckley Middle School. Space and Polity, 12, 157-181.

[8]   Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (1999) Governing Cities: Notes on the Spatialisation of Virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 737-760.

[9]   Massumi, B. (1992) A User’s Guide to “Capitalism and Schizophrenia”: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[10]   Badiou, A. (2000) Deleuze: The Clamor of Being (L. Burchell, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

[11]   Storper, M. and Manville, M. (2006) Behaviour, Preferences and Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Resurgence. Urban Studies, 43, 1247-1274.

[12]   Hillier, J. (2005) Straddling the Poststructuralist Abyss: Between Transcendence and Immanence? Planning Theory, 4, 271-299.

[13]   Rowe, J.E. (2012) The Case for Employing Deleuzian Philosophical Concepts for Understanding Local Economic Development. Applied Geography, 32, 73-79.

[14]   Rowe, J.E. (2009) Moving the Theory of Local Economic Development beyond Metaphors. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 15, 101-114.

[15]   Bennett, R.J. (1988) Local Economic Development: Identifying the Research Priorities. Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon.

[16]   Czohara, L. and Melkers, J. (2004) Performance Measurement in State Economic Development Agencies: Lessons and Next Steps for GDITT (FRC Report No. 92). Georgia State University, Atlanta.

[17]   Milkman, R., Toborg, M., Perez, U. and Boyd, B. (1978) Evaluating Economic Development Programs; A Methodology Handbook. Lazar Management Group, Washington DC.

[18]   Reese, L.A. and Fasenfest, D. (1997) What Works Best? Values and the Evaluation of Local Economic Development Policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 195-207.

[19]   Fasenfest, D. (1997) Commentary: Evaluations Yes, but on Whose Behalf? In: Bingham, R.D. and Mier, R., Eds., Dilemmas of Urban Economic Development: Issues in Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 284-288.

[20]   Felsenstein, D. and Persky, J. (2007) Evaluating Local Job Creation: A “Jobs Chains” Perspective. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 23-34.

[21]   Dewar, M. (1998) Why State and Local Economic Development Programs Cause so Little Economic Development. Economic Development Quarterly, 12, 68-87.

[22]   Bartik, T.J. and Bingham, R.D. (1997) Can Economic Development Programs Be Evaluated? In: Bingham, R.D. and Mier, R., Eds., Dilemmas of Urban Economic Development: Issues in Theory and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 246-277.

[23]   Bartik, T.J. (2002) Evaluating the Impacts of Local Economic Development Policies on Local Economic Outcomes: What Has Been Done and What Is Doable? The W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo.

[24]   Clarke, S.E. and Gaile, G.L. (1992) The Next Wave: Postfederal Local Economic Development Strategies. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 187-198.

[25]   Colebrook, C. (2002) Understanding Deleuze. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.

[26]   Latour, B. (2003) Is Re-Modernization Occurring- and If So, How to Prove It? Theory, Culture & Society, 20, 35-48.

[27]   Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Beyond the Limits of Planning Theory: Response to My Critics. International Planning Studies, 6, 285-292.

[28]   Scott, A.J. and Storper, M. (2003) Regions, Globalization, Development. Regional Studies, 37, 579-593.

[29]   Cox, K.R. (2005) Introduction: The Politics of Local and Regional Development. Space and Polity, 9, 191-200.

[30]   Bevin, S. (2004) New Zealand Economic Indicator Performance 2003/2004 (June Year). Economic Solutions Limited, Napier.

[31]   Rowe, J.E. (2007) Auckland, New Zealand: A Case Study in Regional Governance and Capacity Building for Innovation and Technology. Applied Research in Economic Development, 4, 63-77.

[32]   Rowe, J.E. (2010) Restructuring Economic Development in the Auckland Region. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 2, 121-134.

[33]   Rowe, J.E. (2004) AREDS: A Case Study in Regional Economic Development. Sustaining Regions, 4, 30-40.

[34]   Patton, P. (2000) Deleuze and the Political. Routledge, London.

[35]   Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. (1987) Dialogues. Columbia University Press, New York.

[36]   Latour, B. (2004) Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225-247.

[37]   McGuirk, P.M. (2003) Producing the Capacity to Govern in Global Sydney: A Multiscaled Account. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 201-223.

[38]   ARC (2006) Metro Project Action Plan. Auckland Regional Council, Auckland.

[39]   Wetzstein, S. (2008) Relaunching Regional Economic-Development Policy and Planning for Auckland: Remaking the State and Contingent Governance under Neoliberalism. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 26, 1093-1112.

[40]   Rudman, B. (2007) No, Minister, That’s Too Tough for the Lunatics. New Zealand Herald, A2.

[41]   Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (2002) Social Capital and Community Governance. The Economic Journal, 112, 419-436.

[42]   Semetsky, I. (2003) Deleuze’s New Image of Thought, or Dewey Revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35, 17-29.

[43]   Gough, N. (2005) Internationalisation, Globalisation, and Quality Audits: An Empire of the Mind? The ICARE Conference: The Social Practice of an Educational Research Community, Manchester, 13-14 September.

[44]   Florida, R. (2006) What Really Drives Economic Development?

[45]   Bogue, R. (2005) Nomadic Flows: Globalism and the Local Absolute. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 31, 7-25.

[46]   Jeanes, E.L. (2006) Resisting Creativity, Creating the New. A Deleuzian Perspective on Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 127-134.

[47]   Rowe, J.E. (2013) Understanding Economic Development as a Delauzian “Plateau”. Local Economy, 28, 99-113.

[48]   Amin, A. (2004) Regions Unbound: Towards a New Politics of Place. Geografiska Annaler, 86, 33-44.

[49]   O’Neill, P. and McGuirk, P.M. (2005). Reterritorialisation of Economies and Institutions: The Rise of the Sydney Basin Economy. Space and Polity, 9, 283-305.

[50]   Parr, A. (2005) The Deleuze Dictionary. Columbia University Press, New York.

[51]   Wise, J.M. (2005) Assemblage. In: Stivale, C.J., Ed., Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts, McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, 77-78.

[52]   Jessop, B. and Sum, N.L. (2000) An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong’s Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter) Urban Competition. Urban Studies, 37, 2287-2313.

[53]   Rycroft, S. (2005) The Nature of Op Art: Bridget Riley and the Art of Nonrepresentation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 351-371.

[54]   Dewsbury, J.D. (2000) Performativity and the Event: Enacting a Philosophy of Difference. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 473-496.

[55]   Crouch, D. (2003) Spacing, Performing, and Becoming: Tangles in the Mundane. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1945-1960.

[56]   Le Heron, R. (2005) Academic Economic Geography and Sites of Economic Geography Practice: Examples and Reflection from New Zealand. In: Le Heron, R. and Harrington, J., Eds., New Economic Spaces: New Economic Geographies, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, 220-332.

[57]   Casper Brauun, J. (2004) A Nonhumanist Disposition: On Performativity, Practical Ontology, and Intervention. Configurations: A Journal of Literature, 12, 229-261.

[58]   Kraftl, P. (2007) Utopia, Performativity, and the Unhomely. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 120-143.

[59]   Latham, A. and Conradson, D. (2003) The Possibilities of Performance. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1901-1906.

[60]   Nash, C. (2000) Performativity in Practice: Some Recent Work in Cultural Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 653-664.

[61]   Schon, D. (1983) Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York.

[62]   Thrift, N. and Dewsbury, J.D. (2000) Dead Geographies—And How to Make Them Live. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 411-432.

[63]   Albrechts, L., Schreurs, J. and Van Den Broeck, J. (2003) In Search of Indicators and Processes for Strengthening Spatial Quality: The Case of Belgium. Built Environment, 29, 288-295.