CE  Vol.5 No.10 , June 2014
Andragogy and Engagement in Online Learning: Tenets and Solutions
Author(s) Barry Chametzky*
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the author discusses two tenets of online learning: andragogy and learner engagement. What are the foundational principles of these educational practices? In light of the discussed foundational principles, the author examines various techniques which educators could use in order to help online learners succeed in the often-stressful environment. Ultimately, educators want learners to reach the pinnacle of Bloom’s Taxonomy pyramid; by following the suggestions presented in this paper, educators will help learners accomplish this objective. Yet, more research is needed in this area. Therefore, the recommendation is for further study in the relationship between andragogy and the varied mesh of ideas associated with meaningfulness and engagement.



Cite this paper
Chametzky, B. (2014) Andragogy and Engagement in Online Learning: Tenets and Solutions. Creative Education, 5, 813-821. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.510095.
References
[1]   Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 1-26.
http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/class_differences

[2]   Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States, 2010. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 1-26.
http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/class_differences

[3]   Aslanian, C., & Clinefelter, D. (2012). Online College Students 2012: Comprehensive Data on Demands and Preferences. Louisville, KY: The Learning House, Inc.

[4]   Bakar, K. (2013). Meaning of Andragogy. Al-Madinah Language Studies, 2. http://scholar.mediu.edu.my/index.php/LANGUM/article/view/13758/13327

[5]   Bennett, C., & Monds, K. (2008). Online Courses: The Real Challenge Is “motivation”. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 4, 1-6.
http://journals.cluteonline.com

[6]   Bloom, B. (1984).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. White Plains, NY: Longman.

[7]   Bourke, B. (2014). Adult Millennials: Conceptualizing a Student Subpopulation with Implications for Online Teaching and Learning. In J. Keengwe, & G. L. Schnellert (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Online Learning in Higher Education and Corporate Training (pp. 62-78).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5023-7.ch003

[8]   Chametzky, B., & Shaw, M. (2009). Activities to Integrate Internet Usage in College Foreign Language Classes. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 2, 13-20.
http://ijq.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.186/prod.48

[9]   Chametzky, B. (2013a). What Is Involved in Meaningful E-Learning? Journal of Interdisciplinary Collaboration, 1, 41-59.

[10]   Chametzky, B. (2013b). Offsetting the Affective Filter and Online Foreign Language Learners. http://www.igi-global.com/open-access/paper/
offsetting-affective-filter-classic-grounded/7


[11]   Chan, S. (2010). Applications of Andragogy in Multi-Disciplined Teaching and Learning. Journal of Adult Education, 39, 25-35.
https://www.mpaea.org/docs/pdf/Vol39No22010.pdf

[12]   Chau, P. (2010). Online Higher Education Commodity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22, 177-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9039-y

[13]   Chowdhury, M. (2014). The Task-Based Learning Framework and Its Implications in Language Learning and Teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 111-117. http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/10646

[14]   Coole, H., & Watts, M. (2009). Communal E-Learning Styles in the Online Classroom. Research in Education, 82, 13-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/RIE.82.2

[15]   Cruz, A. (2013). Educational Technology for Teaching and Learning. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 32. http://www.eumed.net/rev/ced/

[16]   Diaz, S. (2010). Meet Cisco Cius: Android Tablet for Workers, Students. Watch Out, iPad? http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/meet-cisco-cius-android-tablet-for-workers-students-watch-out-ipad/36387

[17]   Ennis, C. (2013). Implementing Meaningful, Educative Curricula, and Assessments in Complex School Environments. Sport, Education and Society, 18, 115-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.707978

[18]   Evans, K., Hartman, C., & Anderson, D. (2013). “It’s More than a Class”: Leisure Education’s Influence on College Student Engagement. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 45-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9223-2

[19]   Gutierrez, C., Baralt, S., & Shuck, B. (2010). The Integrated Process of Engagement in Adult Learning. In M. S. Plakhotnik, S. M. Nielsen, & D. M. Pane (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference (pp. 33-39). Miami: Florida International University.
http://coeweb.fiu.edu/research_conference/

[20]   Han, O., Halim, N., Abdullah, Z., & Shariffuddin, R. (2013). Application of Madeline Hunter Model in Mathematics Learning Courseware. 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia (ICICM), Kuala Lumpur, 4-6 September 2013, 76-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICICM.2013.61

[21]   Hannafin, M., Hannafin, K., & Gabbitas, B. (2009). Re-Examining Cognition during Student-Centered, Web-Based Learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57, 767-785.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9117-x

[22]   Hedin, N. (2010). Experiential Learning: Theory and Challenges. Christian Education Journal, 7, 107-117. http://journals.biola.edu/cej

[23]   Henschke, J. (2010). An International Capsule of a Perspective of the History and Philosophy of Andragogy. Andrago?ke Studije, 2, 9-34.
http://www.as.edu.rs/static/pdf/Andragoske%20studije%202010-2.pdf#page=9

[24]   Horsley, T. L. (2010). Innovative Learning Activity. Journal of Nursing Education, 49, 363-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090521-02

[25]   Illeris, K. (2003). Workplace Learning and Learning Theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13665620310474615

[26]   Islam, T., Rahman, S., Malib, S., Uddin, K., & Bashir, G. (2014). Design and Implementation of Web Based Collaborative Learning Model for ICT Course of College Student [sic] in Bangladesh. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3, 393-400.
www.ijcsmc.com

[27]   Kaifi, B., Mujtaba, B., & Williams, A. (2009). Online College Education for Computer-Savvy Students: A Study of Perceptions and Needs. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6, 1-16.
http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/TLC

[28]   Kazempour, M. (2009). Impact of Inquiry-Based Professional Development on Core Conceptions and Teaching Practices: A Case Study. Science Educator, 18, 56-68.
http://www.nsela.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=
category&id=51&Itemid=85


[29]   Kili?-?akmak, E., Karatas, S., & Ocak, M. (2009). An Analysis of Factors Affecting Community College Students’ Expectations One-Learning [sic]. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 351-363. http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.html

[30]   Knowles, M. (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing Company.

[31]   Knowles, M. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing Company.

[32]   Knowles, M. (1984). Introduction: The Art and Science of Helping Adults Learn. In M. S. Knowles (Ed.), Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning (pp. 1-21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[33]   Kuo, Y., Walker, A., Belland, B., Schroder, K., & Kuo, Y. (2014). A Case Study of Integrating Interwise: Interaction, Internet Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction in Synchronous Online Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15.
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1664/2768

[34]   Lebedev, A., & Fedoseyeva, T. (2009). Principles of Learning and Interrelation of Learning and Teaching in Present-Day Andragogy. Vestnyk DonNACEA, 3, 107-112.
http://www.dgasa.dn.ua/inform.php?lng=e&pid=188&art=198

[35]   Mallinson, B., & Krull, G. (2013). Building Academic Staff Capacity to Support Online Learning in Developing Countries. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17, 63-72.
http://sc-d7.sloan-c-support.org/sites/default/files/
articles/downloads/7%20BUILDING%20ACADEMIC
%20STAFF%20CAPACITY_0.pdf


[36]   Maslow, A. (1967). A Theory of Metamotivation: The Biological Rooting of the Value-Life. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 7, 93-127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002216786700700201

[37]   McGrath, V. (2009). Reviewing the Evidence on How Adult Students Learn: An Examination of Knowles’ Model of Andragogy. The Irish Journal of Adult and Community Education 2009 [sic], 99-110.
http://www.aontas.com

[38]   Metz, T. (2012). The Meaningful and the Worthwhile: Clarifying the Relationships. The Philosophical Forum, 43, 435-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2012.00436.x

[39]   Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to Think like an Adult. Core Concepts of Transformation Theory. In J. Mezirow, & Associates (Eds.), Learning as Transformation. Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[40]   Millheim, K. (2012). Toward a Better Experience: Examining Student Needs in the Online Classroom through Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Model. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8, 159-171. http://jolt.merlot.org/index.html

[41]   Mulvenon, S., & Robinson, D. (2014). The Paradox of Increasing both Enrollment and Graduation Rates: Acknowledging Elephants in the Ivory Tower. International Journal of Higher Education, 3, 66-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p66

[42]   Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2009). Assessing the Online Learner: Resources and Strategies for Faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[43]   Peri?i?, V. (2012). Zappers in Teaching Mathematics. The First Annual Conference on the Aiming for Excellence in STEM Learning and Teaching, London: Imperial College.
http://perisic.com/vesna/STEM_con_paper_10_03_12.pdf

[44]   Pollock, D. (2013). Designing and Teaching Online Courses. http://fsweb.bainbridge.edu/QEP/Docs/DesigningandTeachingOnlineCourses.pdf

[45]   Prabjandee, D., & Inthachot, M. (2013). Self-Directed Learning Readiness of College Students in Thailand. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 2, 1-11.
http://scholarlyexchange.org/ojs/index.php/JERI

[46]   Ray, B., Faure, C., & Kelle, F. (2013). Using Social Impact Games (SIGS) to Support Constructivist Learning: Creating a Foundation for Effective Use in the Secondary Social Studies Education. American Secondary Education, 41, 60-70. http://www.ashland.edu/coe/about-college/
american-secondary-education-journal


[47]   Rolfe, G. (2012). Fast Food for Thought: How to Survive and Thrive in the Corporate University. Nurse Education Today, 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.03.020

[48]   Rothmann, S., & Hamukang’andu, L. (2013). Callings, Work Role Fit, Psychological Meaningfulness and Work Engagement among Teachers in Zambia. South African Journal of Education, 33, 1-16. http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za

[49]   Savicevic, D. (2008). Convergence or Divergence of Ideas on Andragogy in Different Countries. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27, 360-378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370802051504

[50]   Schullery, N. (2013). Workplace Engagement and Generational Differences in Values. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 76, 252-265.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1080569913476543

[51]   Selingo, J., Carey, K., & Pennington, H. (2013). The Next Generation University. http://www.smarthighered.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/
05/THE-NEXT-GENERATION-UNIVERSITY.pdf


[52]   Starr-Glass, D. (2013). Learning through Learning: Experiential Resonance in an Online Management Course. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 2, 65-82.
www.issbs.si/press/ISSN/2232-5697/2_65-82.pdf

[53]   Stroud, R. (2013). Task-Based Learning Challenges in High Schools: What Makes Students Accept or Reject Tasks? The Language Teacher, 37, 21-28.
http://jalt-publications.org/tlt

[54]   Tsai, M. J. (2009). The Model of Strategic E-Learning: Understanding and Evaluating Student E-Learning from Metacognitive [sic] Perspectives. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12, 34-48.
http://www.ifets.info

[55]   Wlodkowski, R. J. (2008). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[56]   Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2009). Criteria for Evaluating Synchronous Learning Management Systems: Arguments from the Distance Language Classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613773

[57]   Zhang, C., & Zheng, G. (2013). Supporting Adult Learning: Enablers, Barriers, and Services. Proceedings SIGITE’13 Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education, 151-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2512276.2512323

[58]   Zhou, S., Yeung, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., & Xiao, H. (2013). Integrating Effective Pedagogies in Science Education with a Design of Alternative Experiments on Electromagnetics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10, 13-21.
http://www.ejmste.com

[59]   Zipp, G., Cahill, T., & Clark, M. (2009). The Role of Collaborative Scholarship in the Mentorship of Doctoral Students. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6, 29-35.
http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/TLC

 
 
Top