CE  Vol.5 No.10 , June 2014
The Paradoxical Nature of Academic Measures and Creativity
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the relationship between high stakes college admissions tests and creativity. One hundred eighteen college students majoring in education were given the Epstein Creativity Competencies Inventory (ECC-I). We examined the total creativity competency score as well as the four different skill areas: Preserves new Ideas; Seeks Challenges: Broadens Skills and Knowledge; and Changes Physical and Social Environment. The students’ ACT and SAT scores were com- pared with their scores on the ECC-I. Results indicate that students with lower ACT scores, scored higher overall on the creativity survey than students with high ACT scores. There was a negative correlation between the students Capturing creativity scores and their SAT scores. This indicates that students with higher SATs rated themselves lower in paying attention to and preserving new ideas; that is, capturing new ideas as they occur. There is a need in our society for innovative and creative thinkers, however, American colleges and universities are still predicting the ability to succeed in college with traditional measures.



Cite this paper
Blake, S. , McCarthy, C. and Krause, J. (2014) The Paradoxical Nature of Academic Measures and Creativity. Creative Education, 5, 797-802. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.510092.
References
[1]   Adams, C. J. (2013). Latest SAT Results Show No Change in Students’ Average Scores. Education Week, 33, 10.

[2]   Anderson, H. H. (1959a). Creativity as Personality Development. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 236-267). New York: Harper & Row.

[3]   Anderson, H. H. (1959b). Creativity in Perspective. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 236-267). New York: Harper & Row.

[4]   Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The Silent Epidemic: Perspectives of High School Dropouts. Washington DC: Civic Enterprises.

[5]   Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2010). The Creativity Crisis. Newsweek. www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/10/the-creatvity-crisis.html

[6]   College Ready (2009). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Documents/College-ready-education-plan-brochure.pdf

[7]   Coy, P. (2013). What’s Holding American Students Back? The SAT. Bloomberg Business Week. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-03/sat-act-college-admissions-tests-are-holding-american-students-back

[8]   Doubleday, J. (2013). Most Students Are Not Ready for College, SAT Report Says. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 60, 17.

[9]   Epstein, R. (1980). In Response: Defining Creativity. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 65.

[10]   Epstein, R. (1991). Skinner, Creativity, and the Problem of Spontaneous Behavior. Psychological Science, 6, 362-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00168.x

[11]   Epstein, R. (1996). Cognition, Creativity, and Behavior: Selected Essays. Westport, CT: Praeger.

[12]   Epstein, R. (1999). Generativity Theory. In M. A. Runco, & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 759-766).

[13]   Epstein, R., Schmidt, S. M., & Warfel, R. (2008). Measuring and Training Creativity Competencies: Validation of a New Test. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400410701839876

[14]   Epstein, R., Kaminaka, K., Phan, V., & Uda, R. (2013). How Is Creativity Best Managed? Some Empirical and Theoretical Guidelines. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22, 359-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12042

[15]   Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Handbook of Creativity. New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1

[16]   Gr?nhaug, K., & Kaufmann, G. (1988). Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

[17]   Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

[18]   Isaksen, S. G., Murdock, M. C., Firestien, R. L., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). Understanding and Recognizing Creativity: The Emergence of a Discipline. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

[19]   Lynch, M. D., & Harris, C. R. (2001). Fostering Creativity in Children, K-8. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

[20]   Runco, M. A. (2006). The Development of Children’s Creativity. In B. Spodek, & N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of the Research on the Education of Young Children (pp. 121-131). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[21]   Saracho, O. N. (2002). Young Children’s Creativity and Pretend Play. Early Child Development and Care, 172, 431-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430214553

[22]   Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

[23]   Taylor, I. A., & Getzels, J. W. (1975). Perspectives on Creativity. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

[24]   US Department of Education (2012). The Condition of Education 2012: A Report from Institute of Educational Sciences. Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

[25]   Webster (2013). Merrian-Webster Online. http://www.merriamwebster.com/http

[26]   Welsch, G. S. (1975). Creativity and Intelligence: A Personality Approach. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute for Research in Social Science.

[27]   Zhou, Y. (2012). Doublethink: The Creativity-Testing Conflict. Education Week. http://zhaolearning.com/2012/08/16/doublethink-the-creativity-testing-conflict

 
 
Top