Back
 CE  Vol.5 No.10 , June 2014
The Paradoxical Nature of Academic Measures and Creativity
Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between high stakes college admissions tests and creativity. One hundred eighteen college students majoring in education were given the Epstein Creativity Competencies Inventory (ECC-I). We examined the total creativity competency score as well as the four different skill areas: Preserves new Ideas; Seeks Challenges: Broadens Skills and Knowledge; and Changes Physical and Social Environment. The students’ ACT and SAT scores were com- pared with their scores on the ECC-I. Results indicate that students with lower ACT scores, scored higher overall on the creativity survey than students with high ACT scores. There was a negative correlation between the students Capturing creativity scores and their SAT scores. This indicates that students with higher SATs rated themselves lower in paying attention to and preserving new ideas; that is, capturing new ideas as they occur. There is a need in our society for innovative and creative thinkers, however, American colleges and universities are still predicting the ability to succeed in college with traditional measures.
Cite this paper: Blake, S. , McCarthy, C. and Krause, J. (2014) The Paradoxical Nature of Academic Measures and Creativity. Creative Education, 5, 797-802. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.510092.
References

[1]   Adams, C. J. (2013). Latest SAT Results Show No Change in Students’ Average Scores. Education Week, 33, 10.

[2]   Anderson, H. H. (1959a). Creativity as Personality Development. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 236-267). New York: Harper & Row.

[3]   Anderson, H. H. (1959b). Creativity in Perspective. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 236-267). New York: Harper & Row.

[4]   Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The Silent Epidemic: Perspectives of High School Dropouts. Washington DC: Civic Enterprises.

[5]   Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2010). The Creativity Crisis. Newsweek. www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/10/the-creatvity-crisis.html

[6]   College Ready (2009). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Documents/College-ready-education-plan-brochure.pdf

[7]   Coy, P. (2013). What’s Holding American Students Back? The SAT. Bloomberg Business Week. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-03/sat-act-college-admissions-tests-are-holding-american-students-back

[8]   Doubleday, J. (2013). Most Students Are Not Ready for College, SAT Report Says. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 60, 17.

[9]   Epstein, R. (1980). In Response: Defining Creativity. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 65.

[10]   Epstein, R. (1991). Skinner, Creativity, and the Problem of Spontaneous Behavior. Psychological Science, 6, 362-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00168.x

[11]   Epstein, R. (1996). Cognition, Creativity, and Behavior: Selected Essays. Westport, CT: Praeger.

[12]   Epstein, R. (1999). Generativity Theory. In M. A. Runco, & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 759-766).

[13]   Epstein, R., Schmidt, S. M., & Warfel, R. (2008). Measuring and Training Creativity Competencies: Validation of a New Test. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400410701839876

[14]   Epstein, R., Kaminaka, K., Phan, V., & Uda, R. (2013). How Is Creativity Best Managed? Some Empirical and Theoretical Guidelines. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22, 359-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12042

[15]   Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Handbook of Creativity. New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1

[16]   Gr?nhaug, K., & Kaufmann, G. (1988). Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

[17]   Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

[18]   Isaksen, S. G., Murdock, M. C., Firestien, R. L., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). Understanding and Recognizing Creativity: The Emergence of a Discipline. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

[19]   Lynch, M. D., & Harris, C. R. (2001). Fostering Creativity in Children, K-8. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

[20]   Runco, M. A. (2006). The Development of Children’s Creativity. In B. Spodek, & N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of the Research on the Education of Young Children (pp. 121-131). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[21]   Saracho, O. N. (2002). Young Children’s Creativity and Pretend Play. Early Child Development and Care, 172, 431-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430214553

[22]   Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

[23]   Taylor, I. A., & Getzels, J. W. (1975). Perspectives on Creativity. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

[24]   US Department of Education (2012). The Condition of Education 2012: A Report from Institute of Educational Sciences. Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

[25]   Webster (2013). Merrian-Webster Online. http://www.merriamwebster.com/http

[26]   Welsch, G. S. (1975). Creativity and Intelligence: A Personality Approach. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute for Research in Social Science.

[27]   Zhou, Y. (2012). Doublethink: The Creativity-Testing Conflict. Education Week. http://zhaolearning.com/2012/08/16/doublethink-the-creativity-testing-conflict

 
 
Top