NS  Vol.6 No.10 , June 2014
Impact of Convective Parameterization Schemes on the Quality of Rainfall Forecast over Tanzania Using WRF-Model
Abstract: To describe the evolution of atmospheric processes and rainfall forecast in Tanzania, the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-ARW) model was used. The principal objectives of this study were 1) the understanding of mesoscale WRF model and adapting the model for Tanzania; 2) to conduct numerical experiments using WRF model with different convective parameterization schemes (CP’s) and investigate the impact of each scheme on the quality of rainfall forecast; and 3) the investigation of the capability of WRF model to successfully simulate rainfall amount during strong downpour. The impact on the quality of rainfall forecast of six CP’s was investigated. Two rainy seasons, short season “Vuli” from October to December (OND) and long season “Masika” from March to May (MAM) were targeted. The results of numerical experiments showed that for rainfall prediction in Dar es Salaam and (the entire coast of the Indian Ocean), GD scheme performed better during OND and BMJ scheme during MAM. Results also showed that NC scheme should not be used, which is in agreement to the fact that in tropics rainfall is from convective activities. WRF model to some extent performs better in the cases of extreme rainfall.
Cite this paper: Kondowe, A. (2014) Impact of Convective Parameterization Schemes on the Quality of Rainfall Forecast over Tanzania Using WRF-Model. Natural Science, 6, 691-699. doi: 10.4236/ns.2014.610069.

[1]   Mhita, M.S. (1990) The Analysis of Rainfall Data for Agriculture in Tanzania. Tanzania Meteorological Research Publication (TMRP), Research Report No. 2/90, Directorate of meteorology Tanzania.

[2]   Ogallo, L.J. (1982) The Statistical Prediction of East African Rainfalls Using Quasi-Biennial Oscillation Phases Information. Kenya Journal of Science and Technology, A3, 43-54.

[3]   Ntale, H.E. (2003) Prediction of East Africa Seasonal Rainfall Using Simplex Canonical Correlation Analysis. Journal of Climate, 16, 2105-2112.<2105:POEASR>2.0.CO;2

[4]   National Centers for Atmospheric Research’s (NCAR) (2014) CSIL Research Data Archive.

[5]   Kain, J.S. (2004) The Kain-Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 43, 170-181.<0170:TKCPAU>2.0.CO;2

[6]   Kain, J.S. and Fritsch, J.M.A. (1990) One Dimensional Entraining/Detraining Plume Model and Its Application in Convective Parameterization. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 47, 2784-2802.<2784:AODEPM>2.0.CO;2

[7]   Fritsch, J.M. and Chappell, C.F. (1980) Numerical Prediction of Convectively Driven Mesoscale Pressure Systems. Part I: Convective Parameterization. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 37, 1722-1733.<1722:NPOCDM>2.0.CO;2

[8]   Betts, A.K. and Miller, M.J. (1993) The Betts-Miller Scheme. In: Emmanuel, K.A. and Raymonds, D.J., Eds., Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 246.

[9]   Grell, G.A. and Devenyi, D.A. (2002) Generalized Approach to Parameterizing Convection Combining Ensemble and Data Assimilation Techniques. Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 38-1-38-4.

[10]   Grell, G.A. (1993) Prognostic Evaluation of Assumptions Used by Cumulus Parameterizations. Monthly Weather Review, 121, 764-787.<0764:PEOAUB>2.0.CO;2