JHRSS  Vol.2 No.2 , June 2014
Corporate Social Responsibility Awareness, Firm Commitment and Organizational Performance
ABSTRACT
In this research, we addressed the following questions that are becoming increasingly important to managers in the banking industry of Ghana: is there a relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) awareness, firm commitment and organizational performance? If yes, how is the relationship between these three variables? The study adopted both qualitative (case study) and quantitative methods respectively. Banks were selected to gather data, which was acquired from answers obtained from our administered questionnaire and also through interviews. The population of the survey constituted the management and non-management staff and customers of UT Bank Ghana and Barclays Bank Ghana Ltd in Ghana. Hypotheses of the study will be analyzed using correlation and regression. Results of the study show that there are high positive correlations between the constructs of corporate social responsibility (CSR) awareness, firm commitment and organizational performance.

Cite this paper
Ntiamoah, E. , Egyiri, P. and Kwamega, M. (2014) Corporate Social Responsibility Awareness, Firm Commitment and Organizational Performance. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 2, 91-101. doi: 10.4236/jhrss.2014.22008.
References
[1]   Bashir, et al. (2011) Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities over the Employees of the Organizations. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 8, 11-21.

[2]   Prakash and Vera-Munoz (2011) Contemporary Issues in Sustainability Accounting, Assurance and Reporting. Valuation Relevance of Environmental Performance, University of Sydney, Sydney.

[3]   Levitt, T. (1958) The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41-50.

[4]   Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, 122-126.

[5]   Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.

[6]   Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.

[7]   Jones, R.G., George, M.J. and Hill, W.C. (2000) Contemporary Management. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

[8]   Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 171-180.

[9]   Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

[10]   Hart, S.L. (1995) A Natural Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.

[11]   Waddock, S.A. and Graves, S.B. (1997) The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

[12]   Moskowitz, M. (1972) Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business & Society Review, 1, 71-75.

[13]   Jensen, M.C. (2002) Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857812

[14]   Halal, W.E. (2000) Corporate Community: A Theory of the Firm Uniting Profitability and Responsibility. Strategy and Leadership, 28, 2.

[15]   Emiliani, M.L. (2001) A Mathematical Logic Approach to the Shareholder vs Stakeholder Debate. Management Decision, 39, 618-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740110399521

[16]   McAdam, R. and Leonard, D. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility in a Total Quality Management Context: Opportunities for Sustainable Growth. Corporate Governance, 3, 36-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700310497104

[17]   Weiss, J.W. (2003) Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach. South-Western, Thomson Learning, Mason.

[18]   Harrison, J.S. and Freeman, R.E. (1999) Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 479-485.

[19]   Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D. and Luce, R.A. (2001) Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference? Business Society, 40, 295-314.

[20]   Jones, T. and Wicks, A. (1999) Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-221.

[21]   Hillman, A.J. and Keim, G.D. (2001) Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125-139.

[22]   Jones, T.M., Wicks, A.C. and Freeman, R.E. (2002) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. In: Bowie, N.E., Ed., The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford.

[23]   Haberberg, A. and Rieple, A. (2001) The Strategic Management of Organisations. Prentice Hall, Harlow.

[24]   Simmons, J. (2004) Managing in the Post-Managerialist Era: Towards Socially Responsible Corporate Governance. Management Decision, 42, 601-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740410518985

[25]   Barney, J. (2001) Corporate Citizenship and Corporate Social Investment: Drivers of Tri-Sector Partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 57-73.

[26]   Waddock, S.A. and Boyle, M.E. (1995) The Dynamics of Change in Corporate Community Relations. California Management Review, 37, 125-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165814

[27]   Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T.M. (1999) Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and the Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256972

[28]   Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J.P. (2003) Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556659

[29]   McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2000) Corporate Social Responsibility & Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603-609.

[30]   Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M.A. and Canela, M.A. (2010) Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 107-126.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0143-8

[31]   Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A. and Waddock, S. (2010) Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 463-490.

[32]   Wartick, S. and Cochran, P. (1985) The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.

[33]   Pohle, G. and Hittner, J. (2008) Attaining Sustainable Growth through Corporate Social Responsibility. IBM Global Services.

[34]   Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks.

[35]   Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.

[36]   Pettigrew, T.F. (1998) Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review Psychology, 49, 65-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65

[37]   Hopkins, M. (2000) The Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility. MHC International Ltd., Monthly Feature.

[38]   Deshpande, S., Tribo, E. and Waddock, T.A. (2002) Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in Extractive Sector: Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 297-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016542207069

[39]   Jaworski, D. and Kohli, A.P. (2008) Corporate Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 153-190.

[40]   Samiee, R. and Roth, P. (1991) Business Ethics. In: Singer, P., Ed., A Companion of Ethics, Basil Blackwell Limited, Oxford, 354-365.

 
 
Top