Easton, P., Entwistle, V.A. and Williams, B. (2010) Health in the “Hidden Population” of People with Low Literacy. A Systematic Review of the Literature. BMC Public Health. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-459
 Akers, T.A. and Lanier, M.M. (2009) Health Policy and Ethics Epidemiological Criminology: Coming Full Circle. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 397-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.139808
 Kuhn, R.M., Schwanenflugel, P.J. and Meisinger, E.B. (2010) Aligning Theory and Assessment Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251.
 Logan, G.D. (1997) Automaticity and Reading: Perspectives from the Instance Theory of Automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 123-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130203
 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read; An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. NIH Publication No. 00-4769. Government Printing Office of Health Publish No. 00-4754, Washington DC.
 Wyse, D. and Goswami, U. (2008) Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-710.
 Cassidy, J., Valadez, C.M. and Garret, S.D. (2010) Literacy Trends and Issues: A Look at the Five Pillars and the Cement That Supports Them. The Reading Teacher, 63, 644-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.8.3
 Samuels, S.J. (1985) Automaticity and Repeated Reading. In: Osborn, J., Wilson, P.T. and Anderson, R.C., Eds., Reading Education: Foundations for a Literate AMERICA, Lexington Books, Lexington, 215-230.
 Kuhn, M.R. (2005) A Comparative Study of Small Group Fluency Instruction. Reading Psychology, 26, 127-146.
 Therrien, W.J. and Hughes, C. (2008) Comparison of Repeated Reading and Question Generation on Student’s Reading Fluency and Comprehension. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6, 1-16.
 Eldredge, J.L. (2005) Foundations of Fluency: An Exploration. Reading Psychology, 26, 161-181.
 Hicks, C.P. (2009) A Lesson on Reading Fluency Learned from the Tortoise and the Hare. The Reading Teacher, 63, 319-323.
 Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S. and Willows, D. (2001) Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
 LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S.J. (1974) Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
 Rawson, K.A. and Middleton, E.L. (2009) Memory-Based Processing as a Mechanism of Automaticity in Text Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 353-370.
 Comaskey, R., Savage, R. and Abrami, P. (2009) A Randomized Efficacy Study of Web-Based Synthetic and Analytic Programmes among Disadvantaged Urban Kindergarten Children. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 92-108.
 Verhoeven, L. and Leeuwe, J.V. (2009) Modeling the Growth of Word-Decoding Skills: Evidence from Dutch. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 205-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851356
 Gates, L. and Yale, I. (2011) A Logical Letter-Sound System in Five Phonic Generalizations. The Reading Teacher, 64, 330-339.
 Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E. and Greenberg, J. (2012) Facilitating Emergent Literacy: Efficacy of a Model That Partners Speech-Language Pathologists and Educators. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 47-63.
 Valencia, S.W., Smith, T.A., Reece, A.M., Li, M., Wixson, K.K. and Newman, H. (2010) Oral Reading Fluency Assessment: Issues of Construct, Criterion, and Consequential Validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270-291.
 Goswami, U. (2005) Synthetic Phonics and Learning to Read: A Cross-Language Perspective. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21, 273-282.
 Gray, C., Ferguson, J., Behan, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J. and Mitchell, D. (2007) Developing Young Readers through the Linguistic Phonics Approach. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15, 15-33.
 De Graaff, S., Bosman, A.M.T., Hasselman, F. and Verhoeven, L. (2009) Benefits of Systematic Phonics Instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430903001308
 Biemiller, A. (1977-1978) Relationship between Oral Reading Rates for Letters, Words, and Simple Text in the Development of Reading Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 223-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747307
 Christensen, C. and Bowey, J. (2005) The Efficacy of Orthographic Rime, Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondence, and Implicit Phonics Approaches to Teaching Decoding Skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327-349.
 Walton, P and Walton, L. (2002) Beginning Reading by Teaching Rime Analogy: Effects on Phonological Skills, Letter-Sound Knowledge, Working Memory, and Word-Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 79-115.
 Schwanenflugel, P.J., Meisinger, E.B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M.R., Strauss, G.P and Morris, R.D. (2006) Becoming a Fluent and Automatic Reader in the Early Elementary School Years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 496-522.
 Blessing, S.B. and Anderson, J.R. (1996) How People Learn to Skip Steps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 576-598.
 Samuels, S.J. and Flor, R.F. (1997) The Importance of Automaticity for Developing Expertise in Reading. The Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 107-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130202
 Samuels, S.J., Schermer, N. and Reinking, D. (1992) Reading Fluency: Techniques for Making Decoding Automatic. In: Samuels, S.J. and Farstrup, A.E., Eds., What Research Says about Reading Instruction (2nd Edition), International Reading Association, Newark, 124-144.
 Faulkner, H.J. and Levy, B.A. (1999) Fluent and Nonfluent Forms of Transfer in Reading: Words and Their Message. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 111-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210817
 Homan, S.P., Klesius, J.P. and Hite, C. (1993) Effects of Repeated Readings and Nonrepetitive Strategies on Students’ Fluency and Comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94-99.
 Fleisher, L.S., Jenkins, J.R. and Pany, D. (1979) Effects on Poor Readers’ Comprehension of Training in Rapid Decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 30-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747430
 Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R.O. and Barkley, E.A. (2009) Effect of Repeated Readings on the Oral Readings on the Oral Reading Fluency of Urban Fourth-Grade Students: Implications for Practice. University of Cincinnati, College of Education, Criminal Justice and Human Services, 12-23. Heldref Publications, Cincinnati.
 McCandliss, B., Beck, I.L., Sandak, R. and Perfetti, C. (2003) Focusing Attention on Decoding for Children with Poor Reading Skills: Design and Preliminary Tests of the Word Building Intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 75-104.
 Turnbull, K.L.P., Bowels, P.R., Skibbe, L.E., Justice, L.M. and Wiggins, A.K. (2010) Theoretical Explanations for Preschoolers’ Lowercase Alphabet Knowledge. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1757-1768.
 Piasta, S.B. and Wagner, R.K. (2010) Developing Early Literacy Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Alphabet Learning and Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0093)
 Bracken, B.A. and Crawford, E. (2010) Basic Concepts in Early Childhood Educational Standards: A 50-State Review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 421-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0363-7
 Bowey, J. (2006) Need for Systematic Synthetic Phonics Teaching within the Early Reading Curriculum. Australian Psychologist, 41, 79-84.
 De Jong, F.G. and Vrielink, L.O. (2004) Rapid Automatic Naming: Easy to Measure, Hard to Improve (Quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 65-88.
 Heikkila, R., Narhi, V., Aro, M. and Ahonen, T. (2009) Rapid Automatized Naming and Learning Disabilities: Does RAN Have a Specific Connection to Reading or Not? Child Neuropsychology, 15, 343-358.
 Torgerson, C., Hall, J. and Brooks, G. (2006) Synthetic or Analytic? Take Your Pick. Literacy Today, 47, 30.
 Cook, M., Littlefair, A. and Brooks, G. (2007) Responses to Wyse and Styles’ Article, “Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: The Debate Surrounding England’s ‘Rose Report’”. Literacy, 41, 169.
 Dilorenzo, K., Rody, C., Bucholz, J. and Brady, M. (2011) Teaching Letter-Sound Connections with Picture Mnemonics: Itchy’s Alphabet and Early Decoding. Preventing School Failure, 55, 28-34.
 Kirk, C. and Gillon, G.T. (2009) Integrated Morphological Awareness Intervention as a tool for Improving Literacy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 341-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0009)
 Sweller, J., Kirschner, P.A. and Clark, R.E. (2007) Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42, 115-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263426
 Goldin-Meadow, S. and Mayberry, R.I. (2001) How do Profoundly Deaf Children Learn to Read? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 222-229. The Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children.
 Johnston, R. and Watson, J. (2004) Accelerating the Development of Reading, Spelling and Phonemic Awareness Skills in Initial Readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 327-357.
 Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Barth, A.E., Denton, C.A., Cirino, P.T., Francis, D.J. and Vaughn, S. (2011) Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention. School Psychology Review, 40, 3-22.
 Samuels, S.J., La Berge, D. and Bremer, C. (1978) Units of Word Recognition: Evidence for Developmental Changes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 715-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90433-4
 Cunningham, J.W. (2001) The National Reading Panel Report. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 326-335.
 Foster, W.A. and Miller, M. (2007) Development of the Literacy Achievement Gap: A Longitudinal Study of Kindergarten through Third Grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 173-181.
 Bowey, J.A., McGuigan, M. and Ruschena, A. (2005) On the Association between Serial Naming Speed for Letters and Digits and Word-Reading Skill: Towards a Developmental Account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400-422.
 Haskell, D., Foorman, B. and Swank, P. (1992) Effects of Three Orthographic/Phonological Units on First-Grade Reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 40-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193259201300207
 Pullen, P., Lane, H., Lloyd, J., Nowak, R. and Ryals, J. (2005) Effects of Explicit Instruction on Decoding of Struggling First Grade Students: A Data-Based Case Study. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 63-76.
 Logan, S. and Johnston, R. (2009) Gender Differences in Reading Ability and Attitudes: Examining Where These Differences Lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 199-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x
 Logan, S. and Johnston, R. (2010) Investigating Gender Differences in Reading. Educational Review, 62, 175-187.
 Spironelli, C., Penolazzi, B. and Angrilli, A. (2010) Gender Differences in Reading in School-Aged Children: An Early ERP Study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 357-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2010.480913
 Callaghan, G. and Madelaine, A. (2012) Levelling the Playing Field for Kindergarten Entry: Research Implications for Preschool Early Literacy Instruction. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37, 13-23.