OJN  Vol.4 No.6 , May 2014
Differences in Mean Number of Consonant-Vowel-Consonant Words Decoded between Letter-Sound Readers and Non Letter-Sound Readers
Abstract: Children’s failure to develop simple word decoding skills in early years is linked to future poor reading, school dropout, and poor health [1] [2]. Letter-sound knowledge is needed for word decoding development; however questions remain on what types of letter-sound knowledge help children decode simple words [3]. This study investigated the differences in mean number of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words decoded between two groups of children, a letter-sound reading group and non letter-sound reading group. Children aged 4 to 6 in both groups, attempted to decode a variety of simple words such as tan, sit, hen, pig, dot, and fun. Analysis determined word decoding differences existed between the two groups. The alternate hypothesis was accepted; the letter-sound reading group had a significantly higher mean in number of consonant-vowel-consonant words decoded compared to the non letter-sound reading group. The study informs the teaching approaches needed to improve early decoding skills showing letter-sound reading ability is an important step for learning to decode simple consonant-vowel-consonant words.
Cite this paper: Wolf, G. (2014) Differences in Mean Number of Consonant-Vowel-Consonant Words Decoded between Letter-Sound Readers and Non Letter-Sound Readers. Open Journal of Nursing, 4, 409-450. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2014.46047.

[1]   Adams, M.J. (1990) Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[2]   Easton, P., Entwistle, V.A. and Williams, B. (2010) Health in the “Hidden Population” of People with Low Literacy. A Systematic Review of the Literature. BMC Public Health.

[3]   National Institute for Literacy (2008) Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. National Center for Family Literacy, Jessup, 20794-1398.

[4]   National Center for Education Statistics (2003) National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NAAL Website.

[5]   Akers, T.A. and Lanier, M.M. (2009) Health Policy and Ethics Epidemiological Criminology: Coming Full Circle. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 397-402.

[6]   Kuhn, R.M., Schwanenflugel, P.J. and Meisinger, E.B. (2010) Aligning Theory and Assessment Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251.

[7]   Logan, G.D. (1997) Automaticity and Reading: Perspectives from the Instance Theory of Automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 123-147.

[8]   National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read; An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. NIH Publication No. 00-4769. Government Printing Office of Health Publish No. 00-4754, Washington DC.

[9]   Wyse, D. and Goswami, U. (2008) Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-710.

[10]   Hovland, M., Gapp, S. and Theis, B. (2011) Look: Examining the Concept of Learning to Look at Print. Reading Improvement, 48, 128-138.

[11]   Chall, J. (1967) Learning to Read: The Great Debate. McGraw Hill, New York.

[12]   Fries, C.C. (1962) Linguistics and Reading. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

[13]   Cassidy, J., Valadez, C.M. and Garret, S.D. (2010) Literacy Trends and Issues: A Look at the Five Pillars and the Cement That Supports Them. The Reading Teacher, 63, 644-655.

[14]   Deeney, T.A. (2010) One-Minute Fluency Measures: Mixed Messages in Assessment and Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63, 440-450.

[15]   Samuels, S.J. (1985) Automaticity and Repeated Reading. In: Osborn, J., Wilson, P.T. and Anderson, R.C., Eds., Reading Education: Foundations for a Literate AMERICA, Lexington Books, Lexington, 215-230.

[16]   Chomsky, C. (1976) After Decoding: What? Language Arts, 53, 288-296.

[17]   Kuhn, M.R. (2005) A Comparative Study of Small Group Fluency Instruction. Reading Psychology, 26, 127-146.

[18]   Therrien, W.J. and Hughes, C. (2008) Comparison of Repeated Reading and Question Generation on Student’s Reading Fluency and Comprehension. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6, 1-16.

[19]   Eldredge, J.L. (2005) Foundations of Fluency: An Exploration. Reading Psychology, 26, 161-181.

[20]   Hicks, C.P. (2009) A Lesson on Reading Fluency Learned from the Tortoise and the Hare. The Reading Teacher, 63, 319-323.

[21]   Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S. and Willows, D. (2001) Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.

[22]   LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S.J. (1974) Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

[23]   Rawson, K.A. and Middleton, E.L. (2009) Memory-Based Processing as a Mechanism of Automaticity in Text Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 353-370.

[24]   The Report of the Commission on Reading (1985) Becoming a Nation of Readers. The National Institute of Education, Washington DC.

[25]   Comaskey, R., Savage, R. and Abrami, P. (2009) A Randomized Efficacy Study of Web-Based Synthetic and Analytic Programmes among Disadvantaged Urban Kindergarten Children. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 92-108.

[26]   Verhoeven, L. and Leeuwe, J.V. (2009) Modeling the Growth of Word-Decoding Skills: Evidence from Dutch. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 205-223.

[27]   Mesmer, A. and Griffith, P. (2005) Everybody’s Selling It—But Just What Is Explicit, Systematic Phonics Instruction? International Reading Association, 59, 366-376.

[28]   Wernham, S. (2005) What Is Synthetic Phonics? Literacy Today, 8-9.

[29]   Dickinson, D.K. and Neuman, S.B. (2006) Handbook of Early Literacy Research (Vol. 2). Guilford Press, New York.

[30]   Gates, L. and Yale, I. (2011) A Logical Letter-Sound System in Five Phonic Generalizations. The Reading Teacher, 64, 330-339.

[31]   Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E. and Greenberg, J. (2012) Facilitating Emergent Literacy: Efficacy of a Model That Partners Speech-Language Pathologists and Educators. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 47-63.

[32]   Greaney, K. and Arrow, A. (2012) Phonological-Based Assessment and Teaching within a First Year Reading Program in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35, 9-32.

[33]   Tindal, G. (2002) Review of the Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Mental Measurements Yearbook.

[34]   Valencia, S.W., Smith, T.A., Reece, A.M., Li, M., Wixson, K.K. and Newman, H. (2010) Oral Reading Fluency Assessment: Issues of Construct, Criterion, and Consequential Validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270-291.

[35]   Denton, C. and Otaiba, S. (2011) Teaching Word Identification to Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43, 1-16.

[36]   Goswami, U. (2005) Synthetic Phonics and Learning to Read: A Cross-Language Perspective. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21, 273-282.

[37]   Gray, C., Ferguson, J., Behan, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J. and Mitchell, D. (2007) Developing Young Readers through the Linguistic Phonics Approach. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15, 15-33.

[38]   De Graaff, S., Bosman, A.M.T., Hasselman, F. and Verhoeven, L. (2009) Benefits of Systematic Phonics Instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318-333.

[39]   Biemiller, A. (1977-1978) Relationship between Oral Reading Rates for Letters, Words, and Simple Text in the Development of Reading Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 223-253.

[40]   Christensen, C. and Bowey, J. (2005) The Efficacy of Orthographic Rime, Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondence, and Implicit Phonics Approaches to Teaching Decoding Skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327-349.

[41]   Walton, P and Walton, L. (2002) Beginning Reading by Teaching Rime Analogy: Effects on Phonological Skills, Letter-Sound Knowledge, Working Memory, and Word-Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 79-115.

[42]   Samuels, S.J. (1979) The Method of Repeated Readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.

[43]   Schwanenflugel, P.J., Meisinger, E.B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M.R., Strauss, G.P and Morris, R.D. (2006) Becoming a Fluent and Automatic Reader in the Early Elementary School Years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 496-522.

[44]   Kostewicz, D. and Kubina, R. (2010) Comparison of Two Reading Fluency Methods: Repeated Readings to a Fluency Criterion and Interval Sprinting. Reading Improvement, 47, 43-63.

[45]   Blessing, S.B. and Anderson, J.R. (1996) How People Learn to Skip Steps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 576-598.

[46]   Samuels, S.J. and Flor, R.F. (1997) The Importance of Automaticity for Developing Expertise in Reading. The Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 107-118.

[47]   Samuels, S.J., Schermer, N. and Reinking, D. (1992) Reading Fluency: Techniques for Making Decoding Automatic. In: Samuels, S.J. and Farstrup, A.E., Eds., What Research Says about Reading Instruction (2nd Edition), International Reading Association, Newark, 124-144.

[48]   Faulkner, H.J. and Levy, B.A. (1999) Fluent and Nonfluent Forms of Transfer in Reading: Words and Their Message. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 111-116.

[49]   Homan, S.P., Klesius, J.P. and Hite, C. (1993) Effects of Repeated Readings and Nonrepetitive Strategies on Students’ Fluency and Comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94-99.

[50]   Labbo, L.D. and Teale, W.H. (1990) Cross-Age Reading: A Strategy for Helping Poor Readers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 362-369.

[51]   Sindelar, P.T., Monda, L.S. and O’Shea, L.J. (1990) Effects of Repeated Readings on Instructional and Mastery-Level Readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 220-226.

[52]   Fleisher, L.S., Jenkins, J.R. and Pany, D. (1979) Effects on Poor Readers’ Comprehension of Training in Rapid Decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 30-48.

[53]   O’Shea, L.J., Sindelar, P.T. and O’Shea, D.J. (1985) The Effects of Repeated Readings and Attentional Cues on Reading Fluency and Comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129-142.

[54]   Schreiber, P.A. (1980) On the Acquisition of Reading Fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 176-186.

[55]   Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R.O. and Barkley, E.A. (2009) Effect of Repeated Readings on the Oral Readings on the Oral Reading Fluency of Urban Fourth-Grade Students: Implications for Practice. University of Cincinnati, College of Education, Criminal Justice and Human Services, 12-23. Heldref Publications, Cincinnati.

[56]   McCandliss, B., Beck, I.L., Sandak, R. and Perfetti, C. (2003) Focusing Attention on Decoding for Children with Poor Reading Skills: Design and Preliminary Tests of the Word Building Intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 75-104.

[57]   Turnbull, K.L.P., Bowels, P.R., Skibbe, L.E., Justice, L.M. and Wiggins, A.K. (2010) Theoretical Explanations for Preschoolers’ Lowercase Alphabet Knowledge. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1757-1768.

[58]   Piasta, S.B. and Wagner, R.K. (2010) Developing Early Literacy Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Alphabet Learning and Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8-38.

[59]   Bracken, B.A. and Crawford, E. (2010) Basic Concepts in Early Childhood Educational Standards: A 50-State Review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 421-430.

[60]   Bowey, J. (2006) Need for Systematic Synthetic Phonics Teaching within the Early Reading Curriculum. Australian Psychologist, 41, 79-84.

[61]   De Jong, F.G. and Vrielink, L.O. (2004) Rapid Automatic Naming: Easy to Measure, Hard to Improve (Quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 65-88.

[62]   Heikkila, R., Narhi, V., Aro, M. and Ahonen, T. (2009) Rapid Automatized Naming and Learning Disabilities: Does RAN Have a Specific Connection to Reading or Not? Child Neuropsychology, 15, 343-358.

[63]   Torgerson, C., Hall, J. and Brooks, G. (2006) Synthetic or Analytic? Take Your Pick. Literacy Today, 47, 30.

[64]   Burkard, T. (2010) So Why Can’t They Read? Literacy Today, 9-10.

[65]   Cook, M., Littlefair, A. and Brooks, G. (2007) Responses to Wyse and Styles’ Article, “Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: The Debate Surrounding England’s ‘Rose Report’”. Literacy, 41, 169.

[66]   Dilorenzo, K., Rody, C., Bucholz, J. and Brady, M. (2011) Teaching Letter-Sound Connections with Picture Mnemonics: Itchy’s Alphabet and Early Decoding. Preventing School Failure, 55, 28-34.

[67]   Kirk, C. and Gillon, G.T. (2009) Integrated Morphological Awareness Intervention as a tool for Improving Literacy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 341-351.

[68]   Sweller, J., Kirschner, P.A. and Clark, R.E. (2007) Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42, 115-121.

[69]   McCardle, P. and Chhabra, V. (2004) The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research. Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore.

[70]   Friedman Narr, R.A. (2006) Teaching Phonological Awareness with Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 53-58.

[71]   Goldin-Meadow, S. and Mayberry, R.I. (2001) How do Profoundly Deaf Children Learn to Read? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 222-229. The Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children.

[72]   Johnston, R. and Watson, J. (2004) Accelerating the Development of Reading, Spelling and Phonemic Awareness Skills in Initial Readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 327-357.

[73]   Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Barth, A.E., Denton, C.A., Cirino, P.T., Francis, D.J. and Vaughn, S. (2011) Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention. School Psychology Review, 40, 3-22.

[74]   Ritchey, K. (2008) Assessing the Letter sound Knowledge: A Comparison of Letter Sound Fluency and Nonsense Word Fluency. Council for Exceptional Children, 74, 487-506.

[75]   Samuels, S.J., La Berge, D. and Bremer, C. (1978) Units of Word Recognition: Evidence for Developmental Changes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 715-720.

[76]   Stanovich, K.F., Cunningham, A.E. and West, R.F. (1981) A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Automatic Recognition Skills in First Grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 58-71.

[77]   Cunningham, J.W. (2001) The National Reading Panel Report. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 326-335.

[78]   Foster, W.A. and Miller, M. (2007) Development of the Literacy Achievement Gap: A Longitudinal Study of Kindergarten through Third Grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 173-181.

[79]   Hansen, A. and Farrell, D. (1996) Research Review. The Growing Child, 14, 1-2.

[80]   Bowey, J.A., McGuigan, M. and Ruschena, A. (2005) On the Association between Serial Naming Speed for Letters and Digits and Word-Reading Skill: Towards a Developmental Account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400-422.

[81]   Holcomb, E.L. (2004) Getting Excited about Data: Combining People, Passion and Proof to Maximize Student Achievement. 2nd Edition, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks.

[82]   George, D. and Mallery, P. (2010) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 17.0 Update. 10th Edition, Pearson, Boston.

[83]   Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. and Airasian, P.W. (2012) Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. 10th Edition, Pearson, Upper Saddle River.

[84]   Creswell, J.W. (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

[85]   Haskell, D., Foorman, B. and Swank, P. (1992) Effects of Three Orthographic/Phonological Units on First-Grade Reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 40-49.

[86]   Allender, J.A. and Rector, C. and Warner, K.D. (2010) Community Health Nursing. 7th Edition, Lippincott, Williams & Williams, Philadelphia.

[87]   Wanzek, J. and Haager, D. (2003) Teaching Word Recognition with Blending and Analogizing: Two Strategies Are Better Than One. Council for Exceptional Children, 36, 32-38.

[88]   Pullen, P., Lane, H., Lloyd, J., Nowak, R. and Ryals, J. (2005) Effects of Explicit Instruction on Decoding of Struggling First Grade Students: A Data-Based Case Study. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 63-76.

[89]   Logan, S. and Johnston, R. (2009) Gender Differences in Reading Ability and Attitudes: Examining Where These Differences Lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 199-214.

[90]   Logan, S. and Johnston, R. (2010) Investigating Gender Differences in Reading. Educational Review, 62, 175-187.

[91]   Spironelli, C., Penolazzi, B. and Angrilli, A. (2010) Gender Differences in Reading in School-Aged Children: An Early ERP Study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 357-375.

[92]   Callaghan, G. and Madelaine, A. (2012) Levelling the Playing Field for Kindergarten Entry: Research Implications for Preschool Early Literacy Instruction. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37, 13-23.

[93]   Montessori, M. (1965) The Advanced Montessori Method (Vol. 1). (F. Simmonds, Trans.). Schocken Books, New York.

[94]   Montessori. M. (1966) The Discovery of the Child (M.A. Johnstone, Trans.). Kalakshetra Publications, Thiruvanmiyur.

[95]   Lodico, G.M., Spaulding, D.T. and Voegtle, K.H. (2010) Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. 2nd Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.