Health  Vol.6 No.11 , May 2014
Dietary Intakes by Different Markers of Socioeconomic Status: A Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Previous studies show that diet quality varies by socioeconomic gradient. We compared the influence of individual- and area-level socioeconomic characteristics on food choice behavior and dietary nutrient intakes in a cross-sectional survey. Daily nutrient intakes were calculated from a food frequency questionnaire. Participants comprised 4007 people (1915 men, 2092 women) aged 35 to 74 years. Socioeconomic measures included the area-based deprivation NZDep2001, gross household income, education level and the occupation-based New Zealand Socioeconomic Index (NZSEI96). Results: Nutrients expressed as their percentage contribution to total energy intakes and adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity, showed that intakes of cholesterol were higher in the lower income groups, and fibre, alcohol and calcium were lower compared to the highest income group. Similarly adjusted nutrients expressed as their contribution to total energy intakes showed lower alcohol intakes in the lower NZDep2001 classes compared to the highest NZDep2001 class. Lower fruit, cheese, wine, and spirit servings were found in both the lower income and NZDep2001 groups. Lower vegetables, milk and cereal servings were found in the lowest income group compared with the highest. Higher chicken, eggs and bread servings were found in the lowest NZDep2001 group compared to the highest NZDep2001 group. Few statistically significant associations were observed with the NZSEI96 or education. Conclusion: Income was more strongly associated with nutrient intakes and NZDep2001 with food group selections. Lower fruit, cheese, wine and spirit servings in the lower SES strata showed independent associations with income and NZDep2001. However, NZDep2001 and income appear to be measuring different elements of dietary intakes and food group servings, with income being associated with lower vegetable, milk and cereal servings, and increased dietary cholesterol and lower fibre, and calcium intakes and NZDep2001 with increased chicken, eggs and bread servings. More in depth, research into area-level determinants of diet is warranted.

Cite this paper
Metcalf, P. , Scragg, R. and Jackson, R. (2014) Dietary Intakes by Different Markers of Socioeconomic Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health, 6, 1201-1211. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.611147.
References
[1]   National Health Committee (1998) The Social, Cultural and Economic Determinants of Health in New Zealand: Action to Improve Health. Ministry of Health, Wellington.

[2]   Howden-Chapman, P. and Tobias, M., Eds. (2000) Social Inequalities in Health: New Zealand 1999. Ministry of Health, Wellington.

[3]   Davis, P., McLeod, K., Ransom, M. and Ongley, P. (1997) The New Zealand Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status (NZSEI). Research Report #2. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington.

[4]   Geyer, S., Hemstrom, O., Peter, R. and Vagero, D. (2006) Education, Income, and Occupational Class Cannot Be Used Interchangeably in Social Epidemiology. Empirical Evidence against a Common Practice. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60, 804-810.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041319

[5]   Metcalf, P., Scragg, R. and Davis, P. (2006) Dietary Intakes by Different Markers of Socioeconomic Status: Results of a New Zealand Workforce Survey. New Zealand Medical Journal, 119, U2127.

[6]   Statistics New Zealand (2006).
http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/about-2006-census/information-by-variable/ethnicity.aspx

[7]   Statistics New Zealand (2001) New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations 1999. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington.

[8]   Davis, P., Jenkin, G. and Coope, P. (2003) New Zealand Socio-Economic Index 1996. An Update and Revision of the New Zealand Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington.

[9]   Salmond, C. and Crampton, P. (2002) NZDep2001 Index of Deprivation User’s Manual.
http://www.moh.govt.nz

[10]   Bray, G. and Atkinson, R. (1977) Factors Affecting Basal Metabolic Rate. Progress in Food & Nutrition Science, 2, 395-403.

[11]   Schofield, W. (1985) Predicting Basal Metabolic Rate, New Standards and Review of Previous Work. Human Nutrition. Clinical Nutrition, 39, 5-41.

[12]   Goldberg, G., Black, A., Jebb, S., Cole, T., Murgatroyd, P., Coward, W., et al. (1991) Critical Evaluation of Energy Intake Data Using Fundamental Principles of Energy Physiology: 1. Derivation of Cut-Off Limits to Identify Under-Recording. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 45, 583-599.

[13]   Nutrition Section Department of Health (1984) Energy Value of Commonly Used Foods: A Calorie Guide for Slimmers. Department of Health, Wellington.

[14]   FOODfiles (2004) Datafiles of the New Zealand Food Composition Database. New Zealand Institute of Crop & Food Research, Palmerston North.

[15]   Metcalf, P.A., Swinburn, B., Scragg, R. and Dryson, E. (1997) Reproducibility and Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire in European and Polynesian New Zealanders. Ethnicity & Health, 2, 297-308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13557858.1997.9961838

[16]   Lohr, S. and Rao, J. (2000) Inference from Dual Frame Surveys. JASA, 95, 271-280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10473920

[17]   Skinner, C. and Rao, J. (1996) Estimation in Dual Frame Surveys with Complex Designs. JASA, 91, 349-356.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476695

[18]   Metcalf, P. and Scott, A. (2009) Using Multiple Frames in Health Surveys. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1512-1523.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3566

[19]   SAS Institute Inc. (2011) SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.

[20]   Cheadle, A., Psaty, B., Curry, S., Wagner, E., Diehr, P., Koepsell, T., et al. (1991) Community-Level Comparisons between the Grocery Store Environment and Individual Dietary Practices. Preventive Medicine, 20, 250-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(91)90024-X

[21]   Mooney, C. (1990) Cost and Availability of Healthy Food Choices in a London Health District. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 3, 111-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.1990.tb00058.x

[22]   Pearce, J., Blakely, T., Witten, K. and Bartie, P. (2007) Neighbourhood Deprivation and Access to Fast Food Retailing. A National Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 375-382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.009

[23]   James, W., Nelson, M., Ralph, A. and Leather, S. (1997) Socioeconomic Determinants of Health: The Contribution of Nutrition to Inequalities in Health. BMJ, 314, 1545.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7093.1545

[24]   Boukouvalas, G., Shankar, B. and Traill, W. (2009) Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Intake in England: A Re-Examination Based on Quantile Regression. Public Health Nutrition, 12, 2183-2191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009005175

[25]   Barker, M., Lawrence, L., Crozier, S., Robinson, S., Baird, J., Margetts, B., et al. (2009) Educational Attainment, Perceived Control and the Quality of Women’s Diets. Appetite, 52, 631-636.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.011

[26]   Diez-Roux, A., Nieto, F., Caulfield, L., Tyroler, H., Watson, R. and Szklo, M. (1999) Neighborhood Differences in Diet: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53, 55-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.1.55

[27]   Amuzu, A., Carson, C., Watt, H., Lawlor, D. and Ebrahin, S. (2009) Influence of Area and Individual Lifecourse Deprivation on Health Behaviours: Findings from the British Women’s Heart and Health Study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 16, 169-173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e328325d64d

[28]   Giskes, K., Turrell, G., van Lenthe, F., Brug, J. and Mackenbach, J. (2006) A Multilevel Study of Socio-Economic Inequalities in Food Choice Behaviour and Dietary Intake among the Dutch Population: The GLOBE Study. Public Health Nutrition, 9, 75-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PHN2005758

[29]   Gray, L. and Leyland, A. (2008) A Multilevel Analysis of Diet and Socio-Economic Status in Scotland: Investigating the “Glasgow Effect”. Public Health Nutrition, 12, 1351-1358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008004047

[30]   Diez-Roux, A., Nieto, F., Caulfield, L., Tyroler, H., Watso, R. and Szklo, M. (1999) Neigbourhood Differences in Diet: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53, 55-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.1.55

[31]   Smith, A. and Baghurst, K. (1992) Public Health Implications of Dietary Differences between Social Status and Occupational Category Groups. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 46, 409-416.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.46.4.409

[32]   Russell, D., Parnell, W., Wilson, N., Faed, J., Ferguson, E., Herbison, P., et al. (1999) NZ Food: NZ People. Key Results of the 1997 National Nutrition Survey. Ministry of Health, Wellington.

[33]   Mann, J., Nye, T., Wilson, B., Russell, D., Wilson, N. and Herbison, P. (1991) Life in New Zealand Commission Report, Volume V: Health. University of Otago, Dunedin.

[34]   Willett, W. (1990) Nutritional Epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.

 
 
Top