Back
 JACEN  Vol.3 No.2 , May 2014
Effects of Biochar on the Abundance of Three Agriculturally Important Soil Bacteria
Tazeen Fatima Khan, Monzur Morshed Ahmed, Shah Muhammad Imamul Huq*
Show more
Abstract: An in vitro study was conducted to make a comparative study of biochar and biomass on soil bacteria. The responses of three agriculturally important bacteria viz., Bradyrhizobium, Sulphate reducing and Iron oxidizing bacteria, were studied. Total viable counts were also made. Three different types of biomasses viz., rice husk, rice straw and saw dust, and biochars produced thereof were used for the study. The biomasses or biochars were applied to the soil at a rate of 5 t/ha. The study included seven different treatments of biomasses and corresponding biochars including a control. Total counts were made on the original materials as well as on the treated soils at 30, 60 and 90 days of incubation. Bacterial count was higher in all the biomass treated soils than the corresponding biochar treated ones including control. Although the presence of Bradyrhizobium, sulphate reducing and iron oxidizing bacteria were not noted in the fresh soils, their presence, however, was noted after incubation periods. The counts of all three bacteria are however lower in the biochar treated soils than the corresponding biomass treated soils. The paper discusses about the microbial soil health vis-à-vis biochar application, indicating that the materials exert negative effect on the soil microbial population and thereby likely to jeopardize soil health and crop production.
Keywords: Biochar, Bradyrhizobium Incubation, Soil Health
Cite this paper: Khan, T. , Ahmed, M. and Huq, S. (2014) Effects of Biochar on the Abundance of Three Agriculturally Important Soil Bacteria. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 3, 31-39. doi: 10.4236/jacen.2014.32005.
References

[1]   Ball, P.N., MacKenzie, M.D., DeLuca, T.H. and Holben, W.E. (2010) Wildfire and Charcoal Enhance Nitrification and Ammonium Oxidizing Bacteria Abundance in Dry Montane Forest Soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 1243-1253.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0082

[2]   Lehmann, J., Rillig, M.C., Thies, J., Masiello, C.A., Hockaday, W.C. and Crowley, D. (2011) Biochar Effects on Soil Biota—A Review. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, 1812-1836.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022

[3]   McElligott, K.M. (2011) Biochar Amendments to Forest Soils: Effects on Soil Properties and Tree Growth. MS Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow.

[4]   Imamul Huq, S.M. and Shoaib, J.U. (2013) The Soils of Bangladesh (e-Book). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, New York, London, 165.

[5]   United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1951) Soil Survey Manual. Handbook 18. Soil Survey Staff, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.

[6]   Imamul Huq, S.M. and Alam, M.D. (2005) A Handbook on Analyses of Soil, Plant, and Water. University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 43-102.

[7]   Cappuccino, J.G. and Sherman, N. (2007) Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual. Dorling Kindersley Pvt. Ltd, License of Pearson Education, New Delhi, India, 143-193.

[8]   Benson, H.J. (2002) Microbiological Applications: Laboratory Manual in General Microbiology. 8th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, 4.

[9]   Growth and Enumeration of Viable Cells and Unknown Two.
http://www.uiweb.uidaho.edu/micro_biology/250/Week5.pdf

[10]   El Sheikh, E.A.E. and Wood, M. (1989) Response of Chickpea and Soybean Rhizobia to Salt: Influence of Carbon Spruce, Temperature and pH. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 21, 883-887.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(89)90076-X

[11]   Eaton, A.D., Clesceri, L.S. and Greenberg, A.W. (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater. 21st Edition, American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington DC.

[12]   Steiner, C. (2006) Slash and Char as Alternative to Slash and Burn: Soil Charcoal Amendments Maintain Soil Fertility and Establish a Carbon Sink. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 13-28.

[13]   DeLuca, T.H. and Gundale, M.J. (2006) Temperature and Source Material Influence Ecological Attributes of Ponderosa Pine and Douglas-Fir Charcoal. Forest Ecology and Management, 231, 86-93.

[14]   Graber, E.R., Harel, Y.M., Kolton, M., Cytryn, E., Silber, A., David, D.R., Tsechansky, L., Borenshtein, M. and Elad, Y. (2010) Biochar Impact on Development and Productivity of Pepper and Tomato Grown in Fertigated Soilless Media. Plant & Soil, 337, 481-496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6

[15]   Mensah, J.K., Esumeh, F., Iyamu, M. and Omoifo, C. (2006) Effects of Different Salt Concentrations and pH on Growth of Rhizobium sp. and a Cowpea-Rhizobium Association. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Science, 1, 198-202.

[16]   Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ramírez, J. and Hurtado, M. (2007) Biological Nitrogen Fixation by Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Increases with Bio-Char Additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43, 699-708.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z

[17]   Castro, H., Reddy, K.R. and Ogram, A. (2002) Composition and Function of Sulphate-Reducing Prokaryotes in Eutrophic and Pristine Areas of the Florida Everglades. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 6129-6137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.12.6129-6137.2002

[18]   DeLuca, T.H., MacKenzie, M.D. and Gundale, M.J. (2009) Biochar Effects on Soil Nutrient Transformations. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S., Eds., Biochar for Environmental Management and Technology, Earthscan, London, 251-270.

[19]   Zackrisson, O., Nilsson, M.C. and Wardle, D.A. (1996) Key Ecological Function of Charcoal from Wildfire in the Boreal Forest. Oikos, 75, 10-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545580

[20]   Yu, R. (2007) Iron Oxidizing Bacteria at the Groundwater/Surface Water Interface: Presence, Diversity, Activity and Role in Natural Iron Deposition. University of Connecticut, Storrs.

 
 
Top