Contextual Interference Effect Depends on the Amount of Time Separating Acquisition and Testing

Jefferson John dos  Santos; Flavio Henrique  Bastos; Thiago de Oliveira  Souza; Umberto Cesar  Corrêa

doi:10.4236/ape.2014.42014

Jefferson John dos Santos, Flavio Henrique Bastos, Thiago de Oliveira Souza, Umberto Cesar Corrêa

Abstract: Considering the critical role permanence has on predictions related to the contextual interference effect, this study sought to determine whether the manifestation of the effect depends on the time interval separating the acquisition phase (AQ) from the retention test (RT). Four groups of blocked (BL) and four groups of random practice (RD) performed 90 trials of a dart throwing task (AQ) and were tested exclusively after 10 minutes (BL10 and RD10), 24 hours (BL24 and RD24), 7 days (BL7 and RD7) or 30 days (BL30 and RD30). In the AQ, blocked groups performed three blocks of trials, with each block consisting of throwing the darts from one of three distances (2 m, 2.6 m and 3.2 m). For the random groups, the trial order was pseudo-randomized. The results indicated superior performance of RD24, compared to BL24, but no difference was found between the groups tested after 10 minutes, 7 days or 30 days. Thus, our results do not support the notion that higher contextual interference promotes immediate learning benefits nor long-term retention of internal representations. Nevertheless, future research should further investigate the processes underlying the contextual interference effect, since short-term gains (24 h) were found.

Keywords: Motor Learning; Practice Schedule; Dart Throwing, Retention Test

Cite this paper: Santos, J. , Bastos, F. , Souza, T. and Corrêa, U. (2014) Contextual Interference Effect Depends on the Amount of Time Separating Acquisition and Testing. Advances in Physical Education, 4, 102-109. doi: 10.4236/ape.2014.42014.

References

[1] Albaret, J. M., & Thon, B. (1998). Differential Effects of Task Complexity on Contextual Interference in a Drawing Task. Acta Psychologica, 100, 9-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00022-5

[2] Barreiros, J., Figueiredo, T., & Godinho, M. (2007). The Contextual Interference Effect in Applied Settings. European Physical Education Review, 13, 195-208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356336X07076876

[3] Bastos, F. H., Marinovic, W., De Rugy, A., & Tani, G. (2013). Prior Knowledge of Final Testing Improves Sensorimotor Learning through Self-Scheduled Practice. Human Movement Science, 32, 192-202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.008

[4] Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289-300.

[5] Boutin, A., & Blandin, Y. (2010). Cognitive Underpinnings of Contextual Interference during Motor Learning. Acta Psychologica, 135, 233-239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.004

[6] Brashers-Krug, T., Shadmehr, R., & Bizzi, E. (1996). Consolidation in Human Motor Memory. Nature, 382, 252-255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/382252a0

[7] Corrêa, U. C., & Tani, G. (2005). Practice Structure and Adaptive Process in Motor Learning: For a New Approach of Practice. In Motor Behavior: Learning and Development (pp. 141-161). Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan.

[8] Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224

[9] Kantak, S. S., Sullivan, K. J., Fisher, B. E., Knowlton, B. J., & Winstein, C. J. (2010). Neural Substrates of Motor Memory Consolidation Depend on Practice Structure. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 923-925.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2596

[10] Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor-Skill Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.730

[11] Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can Forgetting Facilitate Skill Acquisition? In R. B. W. and I. M. F. David Goodman (Org.), Advances in Psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 3-22). North-Holland.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62528-5

[12] Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive Effort and Motor Learning. Quest, 46, 328-344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1994.10484130

[13] Lee, T. D., & Weeks, D. J. (1987). The Beneficial Influence of Forgetting on Shorterm Retention of Movement Information. Human Movement Science, 6, 233-245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(87)90014-5

[14] Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A Review of the Contextual Interference Effect in Motor Skill Acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241-289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-X

[15] Massigli, M., Nunes, M. E. de S., Freudenheim, A. M., & Corrêa, U. C. (2011). Practice Structure and Ecological Validity on the Adaptive Process of Motor Learning. Revista Brasileira de Educacao Física e Esporte, 25, 39-48.

[16] Moreno, F. J., Avila, F., Damas, J., García, J. A., Luis, V., Reina, R., & Ruíz, A. (2003). Contextual Interference in Learning Precision Skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 121-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.121

[17] Naimo, M. A., Zourdos, M. C., Wilson, J. M., Kim, J.-S., Ward, E. G., Eccles, D. W., & Panton, L. B. (2013). Contextual Interference Effects on the Acquisition of Skill and Strength of the Bench Press. Human Movement Science, 32, 472-484.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2013.02.002

[18] Ollis, S., Button, C., & Fairweather, M. (2005). The Influence of Professional Expertise and Task Complexity upon the Potency of the Contextual Interference Effect. Acta Psychologica, 118, 229-244.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.08.003

[19] Porter, J. M., & Magill, R. A. (2010). Systematically Increasing Contextual Interference Is Beneficial for Learning Sport Skills. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 1277-1285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.502946

[20] R Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 3.0.2). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

[21] Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Black, C., & Park, J.-H. (2000). Spacing Practice Sessions across Days Benefits the Learning of Motor Skills. Human Movement Science, 19, 737-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00021-X

[22] Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual Interference Effects on the Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of a Motor Skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179

[23] Shea, J. B., & Wright, D. L. (1991). When Forgetting Benefits Motor Retention. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 293-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1991.10608726

[24] Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context Effects in Memory and Learning Movement Information. In R. A. Magill (Org.), Advances in Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 345-366). North-Holland.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61998-6

[25] Silva, J. A. de O., Araujo, U. O., Tani, G., & Corrêa, U. C. (2009). Practice Schedule and Task Complexity on the Adaptive Process of Motor Learning. Revista da Educacao Física/UEM, 20, 313-323.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v20i3.6881

[26] Souza, T. O., Santos, J. J., Torriani-Pasin, C., & Corrêa, U. C. (2013). O efeito da interferência contextual na aquisicao de habilidades motoras e as dificuldades funcional e nominal da tarefa. Motricidade, 9, 57-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.9(3).763

[27] Stickgold, R. (2013). Parsing the Role of Sleep in Memory Processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23, 847-853.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.04.002

[28] Travlos, A. K. (2010). Specificity and Variability of Practice, and Contextual Interference in Acquisition and Transfer of an Underhand Volleyball Serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 298-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.298-312

[29] Wright, D. L. (1991). The Role of Intertask and Intratask Processing in Acquisition and Retention of Motor Skills. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 139-145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1991.9942031

[30] Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Whitacre, C. (1992). The Contribution of Elaborative Processing to the Contextual Interference Effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 30-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10607554

[31] Wrisberg, C. A., & Liu, Z. (1991). The Effect of Contextual Variety on the Practice, Retention, and Transfer of an Applied Motor Skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 406-412.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1991.10607541

[32] Wu, W. F. W., Young, D. E., Schandler, S. L., Meir, G., Judy, R. L. M., Perez, J., & Cohen, M. J. (2011). Contextual Interference and Augmented Feedback: Is There an Additive Effect for Motor Learning? Human Movement Science, 30, 10921101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.02.004

[33] Yanci, J., Reina, R., Los Arcos, A., & Camara, J. (2013). Effects of Different Contextual Interference Training Programs on Straight Sprinting and Agility Performance of Primary School Students. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 12, 601607.