CE  Vol.5 No.8 , May 2014
Effectiveness of Examination Handling and Distribution Procedures in Curbing Malpractices in Secondary Schools in Eastern Province, Kenya
ABSTRACT

Examinations provide discriminatory criteria for individuals and evaluate whether educational goals are being achieved. To guarantee equity, fair evaluation must be devoid of all malpractices. The KNEC has put in place policies aimed at reducing cases of examination malpractices; however there has been a rise in reported cases of examination malpractices with the release of every examination results. The current study sought to determine the effectiveness of the examination handling and distribution procedures in addressing the examination malpractices. A sample size of 511 subjects was involved in the study. The study was conducted using descriptive survey research design. Reliability of instruments was determined using cronbach coefficient alpha method. The study established that the management of the examinations is dominated by the male gender. Handling and distribution of examinations was blamed for examinations malpractices. The researcher recommends training for all personnel involved in the management of the examinations.


Cite this paper
Njue, E. , Muthaa, G. and Muriungi, P. (2014) Effectiveness of Examination Handling and Distribution Procedures in Curbing Malpractices in Secondary Schools in Eastern Province, Kenya. Creative Education, 5, 573-579. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.58068.
References
[1]   Afolabi, E.R.I. (1998). Validity of Public Examinations, the Environment and Sustainable National Development. Nairobi: Cardinal Crest Ltd.

[2]   Aullo, P. A. (2004). An Investigation into Factors Contributing to Examination Irregularities in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) in Eastern Province (Unpublished M.Ed Project). Nairobi: University of Nairobi.

[3]   Government of Kenya (GOK) (2003). Laws of Kenya Education Act Chapter 211. Nairobi: Government Printer.

[4]   Ingolo, K. (2009). Maintenance of Standards in KNEC Examination Irregularities. A Paper Presented to Heads of Secondary Schools during the KESSHA Annual National Conference, Mombasa.

[5]   Kithuka, M. (2004). Educational Measurement and Evaluation. Egerton: Egerton University Press.

[6]   KNEC (2008). Examination Rules and Regularities. Nairobi: KNEC.

[7]   MOE (2011). Use of Mobile Phones during Examinations. MOE/CON/GIII/41/5. Nairobi: MOE.

[8]   MOE (2010). Kenya Certificate of Secondary Examination Results Release. Nairobi: MOE.

[9]   Mwandikwa, J., & Ocharo, J. B. (2007). Tough Measures; Exam Cheats Put on Notice. Elimu News, 2, 12-13.

[10]   Nevo, D. (1995). School Based Evaluation: A Dialogue for Schools. New York: Elsevier Science Inc.

[11]   Wasanga, P. (2007). Maintenance of Standards in KNEC Examinations. A Paper Presented during the KESSHA Annual National Conference, Nairobi: Moi Sports Centre.

[12]   Wheeler, D. K. (1997). Curriculum Process. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

[13]   Yussufu, A. (1985). Financing and Security of National Examination. A Paper Presented at the Meeting of Institutions Responsible for Educational Assessment in East and Central Africa. Lilongwe, Malawi.

 
 
Top